REIT - Specialty
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
IRM vs EQIX vs DLR vs AMT vs CCI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Specialty
REIT - Office
REIT - Specialty
REIT - Specialty
IRM vs EQIX vs DLR vs AMT vs CCI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Specialty | REIT - Specialty | REIT - Office | REIT - Specialty | REIT - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $39.18B | $106.36B | $67.59B | $82.98B | $38.88B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7.25B | $9.46B | $6.19B | $10.82B | $4.21B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $272M | $1.42B | $1.31B | $2.88B | $1.06B |
| Gross Margin | 55.0% | 51.3% | 40.0% | 73.4% | 65.7% |
| Operating Margin | 18.0% | 20.8% | 13.7% | 44.2% | 48.0% |
| Forward P/E | 58.4x | 63.7x | 97.2x | 27.2x | 43.0x |
| Total Debt | $19.05B | $22.73B | $24.18B | $44.96B | $29.57B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $159M | $1.73B | $3.45B | $1.47B | $269M |
IRM vs EQIX vs DLR vs AMT vs CCI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Iron Mountain Incor… (IRM) | 100 | 511.3 | +411.3% |
| Equinix, Inc. (EQIX) | 100 | 154.6 | +54.6% |
| Digital Realty Trus… (DLR) | 100 | 137.0 | +37.0% |
| American Tower Corp… (AMT) | 100 | 69.0 | -31.0% |
| Crown Castle Inc. (CCI) | 100 | 51.8 | -48.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IRM vs EQIX vs DLR vs AMT vs CCI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IRM has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in long-term compounding.
- 321.4% 10Y total return vs EQIX's 262.9%
- 12.2% FFO/revenue growth vs CCI's -35.1%
- +38.9% vs AMT's -17.4%
EQIX is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 2.37 vs AMT's 3.72
- Lower P/E (63.7x vs 97.2x), PEG 2.37 vs 3.35
DLR is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 10.0%, EPS growth 122.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.77, Low D/E 97.3%, current ratio 4.50x
AMT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 26.6% margin vs IRM's 3.8%
- 4.5% ROA vs IRM's 1.3%, ROIC 6.9% vs 6.2%
CCI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.26, yield 5.3%
- Beta 0.26, yield 5.3%, current ratio 0.26x
- Beta 0.26 vs IRM's 1.10
- 5.3% yield, vs AMT's 3.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.2% FFO/revenue growth vs CCI's -35.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (63.7x vs 97.2x), PEG 2.37 vs 3.35 | |
| Quality / Margins | 26.6% margin vs IRM's 3.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.26 vs IRM's 1.10 | |
| Dividends | 5.3% yield, vs AMT's 3.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +38.9% vs AMT's -17.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.5% ROA vs IRM's 1.3%, ROIC 6.9% vs 6.2% |
IRM vs EQIX vs DLR vs AMT vs CCI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
IRM vs EQIX vs DLR vs AMT vs CCI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AMT leads in 2 of 6 categories
IRM leads 1 • EQIX leads 0 • DLR leads 0 • CCI leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — IRM and AMT and CCI each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.8B annually — 2.6x CCI's $4.2B. AMT is the more profitable business, keeping 26.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IRM's 3.8%. On growth, IRM holds the edge at +21.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7.2B | $9.5B | $6.2B | $10.8B | $4.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.3B | $4.1B | $2.7B | $6.9B | $2.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $272M | $1.4B | $1.3B | $2.9B | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$625M | $888M | $233M | $3.8B | $2.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.0% | +51.3% | +40.0% | +73.4% | +65.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +18.0% | +20.8% | +13.7% | +44.2% | +48.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.8% | +15.0% | +21.1% | +26.6% | +25.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -8.6% | +9.4% | +3.8% | +34.9% | +64.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +21.6% | +9.8% | +19.3% | +6.8% | -4.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.9% | +20.0% | -51.0% | +76.9% | +132.1% |
Valuation Metrics
AMT leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 33.0x trailing earnings, AMT trades at a 88% valuation discount to IRM's 268.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), DLR offers better value at 1.89x vs AMT's 4.53x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $39.2B | $106.4B | $67.6B | $83.0B | $38.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $58.1B | $127.4B | $88.3B | $126.5B | $68.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 268.78x | 78.38x | 54.94x | 33.05x | 87.35x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 58.45x | 63.68x | 97.24x | 27.18x | 42.99x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.91x | 1.89x | 4.53x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 23.90x | 32.54x | 34.59x | 18.22x | 24.63x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.68x | 11.49x | 11.06x | 7.80x | 9.12x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 7.46x | 2.78x | 8.07x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 28.02x | 21.93x | 13.52x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AMT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMT delivers a 27.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $5 for DLR. DLR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.97x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AMT's 4.34x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DLR scores 7/9 vs CCI's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +10.0% | +5.3% | +27.4% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.3% | +3.6% | +2.7% | +4.5% | +3.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.2% | +4.3% | +1.2% | +6.9% | +5.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.2% | +5.4% | +1.5% | +8.6% | +7.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.60x | 0.97x | 4.34x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $18.9B | $21.0B | $20.7B | $43.5B | $29.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $159M | $1.7B | $3.5B | $1.5B | $269M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $19.1B | $22.7B | $24.2B | $45.0B | $29.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.28x | 3.53x | 3.87x | 3.99x | 2.17x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IRM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IRM five years ago would be worth $37,537 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,417 for CCI. Over the past 12 months, IRM leads with a +38.9% total return vs AMT's -17.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IRM at 35.5% vs CCI's -3.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +59.3% | +41.8% | +27.7% | +2.9% | +1.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +38.9% | +24.3% | +21.0% | -17.4% | -12.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +149.0% | +52.8% | +119.2% | +0.7% | -10.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +275.4% | +66.7% | +47.1% | -15.7% | -35.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +321.4% | +262.9% | +163.8% | +113.0% | +58.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +35.5% | +15.2% | +29.9% | +0.2% | -3.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — IRM and AMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AMT is the less volatile stock with a -0.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IRM's 1.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IRM currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs AMT's 76.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.10x | 0.42x | 0.77x | -0.04x | 0.26x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $131.80 | $1128.68 | $208.09 | $234.33 | $115.76 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $77.77 | $710.52 | $146.23 | $165.08 | $75.96 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.9% | +95.6% | +94.5% | +76.0% | +77.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 75.1 | 61.9 | 61.0 | 53.8 | 60.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.5M | 558K | 1.9M | 2.9M | 3.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — AMT and CCI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: IRM as "Buy", EQIX as "Buy", DLR as "Buy", AMT as "Buy", CCI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 21.5% upside for AMT (target: $216) vs 0.5% for IRM (target: $132). For income investors, CCI offers the higher dividend yield at 5.34% vs EQIX's 1.75%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $132.33 | $1117.40 | $209.00 | $216.33 | $105.40 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 20 | 51 | 48 | 49 | 46 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.3% | +1.8% | +2.5% | +3.8% | +5.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 9 | 0 | 11 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.09 | $18.92 | $4.92 | $6.73 | $4.76 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.4% | +0.1% |
AMT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). IRM leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
IRM vs EQIX vs DLR vs AMT vs CCI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IRM or EQIX or DLR or AMT or CCI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM) is the stronger pick with 12.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -35. 1% for Crown Castle Inc. (CCI). American Tower Corporation (AMT) offers the better valuation at 33. 0x trailing P/E (27. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IRM or EQIX or DLR or AMT or CCI?
On trailing P/E, American Tower Corporation (AMT) is the cheapest at 33.
0x versus Iron Mountain Incorporated at 268. 8x. On forward P/E, American Tower Corporation is actually cheaper at 27. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Equinix, Inc. wins at 2. 37x versus American Tower Corporation's 3. 72x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IRM or EQIX or DLR or AMT or CCI?
Over the past 5 years, Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM) delivered a total return of +275.
4%, compared to -35. 8% for Crown Castle Inc. (CCI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IRM returned +321. 4% versus CCI's +58. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IRM or EQIX or DLR or AMT or CCI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), American Tower Corporation (AMT) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
04β versus Iron Mountain Incorporated's 1. 10β — meaning IRM is approximately -3041% more volatile than AMT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Digital Realty Trust, Inc. (DLR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 97% versus 4% for American Tower Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — IRM or EQIX or DLR or AMT or CCI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM) is pulling ahead at 12.
2% versus -35. 1% for Crown Castle Inc. (CCI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Digital Realty Trust, Inc. grew EPS 122. 4% year-over-year, compared to -19. 7% for Iron Mountain Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, IRM leads at 10. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — IRM or EQIX or DLR or AMT or CCI?
American Tower Corporation (AMT) is the more profitable company, earning 23.
8% net margin versus 2. 1% for Iron Mountain Incorporated — meaning it keeps 23. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CCI leads at 48. 7% versus 10. 8% for DLR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMT leads at 73. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is IRM or EQIX or DLR or AMT or CCI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Equinix, Inc. (EQIX) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 37x versus American Tower Corporation's 3. 72x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, American Tower Corporation (AMT) trades at 27. 2x forward P/E versus 97. 2x for Digital Realty Trust, Inc. — 70. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AMT: 21. 5% to $216. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — IRM or EQIX or DLR or AMT or CCI?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Crown Castle Inc. (CCI) offers the highest yield at 5. 3%, versus 1. 8% for Equinix, Inc. (EQIX).
09Is IRM or EQIX or DLR or AMT or CCI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, American Tower Corporation (AMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
04), 3. 8% yield, +113. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMT: +113. 0%, IRM: +321. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between IRM and EQIX and DLR and AMT and CCI?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: IRM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; EQIX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; DLR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; AMT is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; CCI is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.