Medical - Devices
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
IRMD vs GEHC vs SYK vs BSX vs MDT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Medical - Devices
Medical - Devices
Medical - Devices
IRMD vs GEHC vs SYK vs BSX vs MDT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Devices | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Medical - Devices | Medical - Devices | Medical - Devices |
| Market Cap | $1.11B | $27.90B | $112.69B | $84.08B | $99.94B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $86M | $19.95B | $25.12B | $20.07B | $35.48B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $24M | $1.50B | $3.25B | $2.89B | $4.61B |
| Gross Margin | 76.8% | 42.5% | 63.5% | 69.0% | 61.9% |
| Operating Margin | 32.4% | 12.5% | 22.4% | 19.8% | 17.9% |
| Forward P/E | 42.9x | 13.0x | 19.6x | 16.7x | 14.1x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $10.00B | $14.86B | $12.42B | $28.52B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $51M | $4.51B | $4.01B | $2.04B | $2.22B |
IRMD vs GEHC vs SYK vs BSX vs MDT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| IRadimed Corporation (IRMD) | 100 | 305.0 | +205.0% |
| GE HealthCare Techn… (GEHC) | 100 | 108.7 | +8.7% |
| Stryker Corporation (SYK) | 100 | 116.8 | +16.8% |
| Boston Scientific C… (BSX) | 100 | 116.6 | +16.6% |
| Medtronic plc (MDT) | 100 | 98.0 | -2.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IRMD vs GEHC vs SYK vs BSX vs MDT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IRMD has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 433.9% 10Y total return vs SYK's 187.1%
- PEG 0.58 vs MDT's 36.00
- 27.4% margin vs GEHC's 7.5%
- +72.4% vs BSX's -46.0%
GEHC is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (13.0x vs 14.1x), PEG 20.66 vs 36.00
Among these 5 stocks, SYK doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
BSX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 19.9%, EPS growth 55.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 16.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.34, Low D/E 50.7%, current ratio 1.62x
- 19.9% revenue growth vs MDT's 3.6%
- Beta 0.34 vs GEHC's 1.37, lower leverage
MDT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 36 yrs, beta 0.47, yield 3.6%
- Beta 0.47, yield 3.6%, current ratio 1.85x
- 3.6% yield, 36-year raise streak, vs SYK's 1.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
- 175.8% ROA vs GEHC's 4.1%, ROIC 6.0% vs 13.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.9% revenue growth vs MDT's 3.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.0x vs 14.1x), PEG 20.66 vs 36.00 | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.4% margin vs GEHC's 7.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.34 vs GEHC's 1.37, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.6% yield, 36-year raise streak, vs SYK's 1.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +72.4% vs BSX's -46.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 175.8% ROA vs GEHC's 4.1%, ROIC 6.0% vs 13.3% |
IRMD vs GEHC vs SYK vs BSX vs MDT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
IRMD vs GEHC vs SYK vs BSX vs MDT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IRMD leads in 3 of 6 categories
GEHC leads 1 • MDT leads 1 • SYK leads 0 • BSX leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IRMD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MDT is the larger business by revenue, generating $35.5B annually — 411.3x IRMD's $86M. IRMD is the more profitable business, keeping 27.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GEHC's 7.5%. On growth, BSX holds the edge at +15.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $86M | $20.0B | $25.1B | $20.1B | $35.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $30M | $3.3B | $6.3B | $4.7B | $9.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $24M | $1.5B | $3.2B | $2.9B | $4.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $24M | $1.5B | $4.3B | $3.6B | $5.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +76.8% | +42.5% | +63.5% | +69.0% | +61.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +32.4% | +12.5% | +22.4% | +19.8% | +17.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +27.4% | +7.5% | +12.9% | +14.4% | +13.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +27.9% | +7.6% | +17.1% | +18.1% | +15.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.7% | +7.4% | +11.4% | +15.9% | +8.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +21.6% | -30.9% | +56.0% | +18.5% | -11.9% |
Valuation Metrics
GEHC leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.5x trailing earnings, GEHC trades at a 73% valuation discount to IRMD's 49.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), IRMD offers better value at 0.67x vs MDT's 36.00x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $27.9B | $112.7B | $84.1B | $99.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.1B | $33.4B | $123.5B | $94.5B | $126.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 49.57x | 13.48x | 35.03x | 29.16x | 21.60x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 42.94x | 12.95x | 19.62x | 16.75x | 14.13x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.67x | 20.66x | 2.36x | — | 36.00x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 37.07x | 10.00x | 20.31x | 25.30x | 14.32x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 13.23x | 1.35x | 4.49x | 4.19x | 2.98x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 11.78x | 2.66x | 5.02x | 3.46x | 2.08x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 64.53x | 18.53x | 26.31x | 22.99x | 19.28x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IRMD leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IRMD delivers a 24.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $9 for MDT. BSX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.51x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GEHC's 0.94x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BSX scores 7/9 vs GEHC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +24.5% | +14.4% | +15.0% | +12.4% | +9.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +21.3% | +4.1% | +6.9% | +6.9% | +175.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +50.2% | +13.3% | +11.4% | +8.8% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +27.8% | +10.8% | +13.0% | +11.1% | +7.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.94x | 0.66x | 0.51x | 0.59x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$51M | $5.5B | $10.8B | $10.4B | $26.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $51M | $4.5B | $4.0B | $2.0B | $2.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $10.0B | $14.9B | $12.4B | $28.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 5.35x | 6.72x | 11.03x | 9.08x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IRMD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IRMD five years ago would be worth $31,411 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,230 for MDT. Over the past 12 months, IRMD leads with a +72.4% total return vs BSX's -46.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IRMD at 23.3% vs GEHC's -8.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -9.0% | -25.9% | -15.2% | -40.3% | -18.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +72.4% | -10.7% | -22.5% | -46.0% | -2.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +87.6% | -22.2% | +5.5% | +6.5% | -4.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +214.1% | +2.9% | +21.5% | +31.2% | -27.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +433.9% | +2.9% | +187.1% | +155.5% | +26.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +23.3% | -8.0% | +1.8% | +2.1% | -1.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — IRMD and BSX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BSX is the less volatile stock with a 0.34 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GEHC's 1.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IRMD currently trades 80.4% from its 52-week high vs BSX's 51.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.82x | 1.32x | 0.52x | 0.30x | 0.42x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $107.90 | $89.77 | $404.87 | $109.50 | $106.33 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $50.61 | $58.75 | $289.91 | $54.98 | $77.16 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +80.4% | +68.3% | +72.7% | +51.7% | +73.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.0 | 32.1 | 24.3 | 33.2 | 27.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 91K | 4.3M | 2.1M | 15.5M | 7.8M |
Analyst Outlook
MDT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: IRMD as "Buy", GEHC as "Buy", SYK as "Buy", BSX as "Buy", MDT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 61.4% upside for BSX (target: $91) vs 36.9% for GEHC (target: $84). For income investors, MDT offers the higher dividend yield at 3.57% vs GEHC's 0.23%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $120.00 | $84.00 | $403.69 | $91.33 | $109.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 18 | 50 | 43 | 49 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.3% | +0.2% | +1.1% | — | +3.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 3 | 34 | 0 | 36 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.17 | $0.14 | $3.36 | — | $2.78 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.7% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.2% |
IRMD leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). GEHC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
IRMD vs GEHC vs SYK vs BSX vs MDT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IRMD or GEHC or SYK or BSX or MDT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Boston Scientific Corporation (BSX) is the stronger pick with 19.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 6% for Medtronic plc (MDT). GE HealthCare Technologies Inc. (GEHC) offers the better valuation at 13. 5x trailing P/E (13. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate IRadimed Corporation (IRMD) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IRMD or GEHC or SYK or BSX or MDT?
On trailing P/E, GE HealthCare Technologies Inc.
(GEHC) is the cheapest at 13. 5x versus IRadimed Corporation at 49. 6x. On forward P/E, GE HealthCare Technologies Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: IRadimed Corporation wins at 0. 58x versus Medtronic plc's 36. 00x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IRMD or GEHC or SYK or BSX or MDT?
Over the past 5 years, IRadimed Corporation (IRMD) delivered a total return of +214.
1%, compared to -27. 7% for Medtronic plc (MDT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IRMD returned +431. 3% versus GEHC's +6. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IRMD or GEHC or SYK or BSX or MDT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Boston Scientific Corporation (BSX) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
30β versus GE HealthCare Technologies Inc. 's 1. 32β — meaning GEHC is approximately 341% more volatile than BSX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Boston Scientific Corporation (BSX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 51% versus 94% for GE HealthCare Technologies Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — IRMD or GEHC or SYK or BSX or MDT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Boston Scientific Corporation (BSX) is pulling ahead at 19.
9% versus 3. 6% for Medtronic plc (MDT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Boston Scientific Corporation grew EPS 55. 2% year-over-year, compared to 4. 8% for GE HealthCare Technologies Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BSX leads at 16. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — IRMD or GEHC or SYK or BSX or MDT?
IRadimed Corporation (IRMD) is the more profitable company, earning 26.
8% net margin versus 10. 1% for GE HealthCare Technologies Inc. — meaning it keeps 26. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IRMD leads at 31. 2% versus 13. 4% for GEHC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IRMD leads at 76. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is IRMD or GEHC or SYK or BSX or MDT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, IRadimed Corporation (IRMD) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 58x versus Medtronic plc's 36. 00x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, GE HealthCare Technologies Inc. (GEHC) trades at 13. 0x forward P/E versus 42. 9x for IRadimed Corporation — 30. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BSX: 61. 4% to $91. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — IRMD or GEHC or SYK or BSX or MDT?
In this comparison, MDT (3.
6% yield), IRMD (1. 3% yield), SYK (1. 1% yield), GEHC (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. BSX does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is IRMD or GEHC or SYK or BSX or MDT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Stryker Corporation (SYK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
52), 1. 1% yield, +179. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SYK: +179. 2%, GEHC: +6. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between IRMD and GEHC and SYK and BSX and MDT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: IRMD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GEHC is a mid-cap deep-value stock; SYK is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; BSX is a mid-cap high-growth stock; MDT is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. IRMD, SYK, MDT pay a dividend while GEHC, BSX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.