ITGR vs APH

For growth investors, Amphenol Corporation (APH) is the stronger pick with 51.

7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 6% for Integer Holdings Corporation (ITGR). Integer Holdings Corporation (ITGR) offers the better valuation at 29. 9x trailing P/E (13. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Integer Holdings Corporation (ITGR) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Integer Holdings Corporation (ITGR) is the cheapest at 29.

9x versus Amphenol Corporation at 41. 5x. On forward P/E, Integer Holdings Corporation is actually cheaper at 13. 3x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Amphenol Corporation wins at 1. 07x versus Integer Holdings Corporation's 3. 02x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

Over the past 5 years, Amphenol Corporation (APH) delivered a total return of +321.

4%, compared to -8. 4% for Integer Holdings Corporation (ITGR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: APH returned +917. 7% versus ITGR's +166. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Integer Holdings Corporation (ITGR) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

72β versus Amphenol Corporation's 1. 62β — meaning APH is approximately 125% more volatile than ITGR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Integer Holdings Corporation (ITGR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 80% versus 115% for Amphenol Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Amphenol Corporation (APH) is pulling ahead at 51.

7% versus 7. 6% for Integer Holdings Corporation (ITGR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Amphenol Corporation grew EPS 74. 0% year-over-year, compared to -15. 0% for Integer Holdings Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, APH leads at 22. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Amphenol Corporation (APH) is the more profitable company, earning 18.

5% net margin versus 5. 6% for Integer Holdings Corporation — meaning it keeps 18. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: APH leads at 25. 9% versus 11. 3% for ITGR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — APH leads at 36. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Amphenol Corporation (APH) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 07x versus Integer Holdings Corporation's 3. 02x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Integer Holdings Corporation (ITGR) trades at 13. 3x forward P/E versus 29. 7x for Amphenol Corporation — 16. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for APH: 30. 2% to $180. 33.

In this comparison, APH (0.

5% yield) pays a dividend. ITGR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Integer Holdings Corporation (ITGR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

72), +166. 2% 10Y return). Amphenol Corporation (APH) carries a higher beta of 1. 62 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ITGR: +166. 2%, APH: +917. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (ITGR (Healthcare) and APH (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: ITGR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; APH is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.