ITT
ITT Inc.
Industrial - Machinery
Market Cap$18.43B
5Y Perf.+257.3%
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
ITT vs HON vs EMR vs ROK vs XYL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
HON
Honeywell International Inc.
Conglomerates
Market Cap$135.04B
5Y Perf.+46.1%
EMR
Emerson Electric Co.
Industrial - Machinery
Market Cap$79.14B
5Y Perf.+131.5%
ROK
Rockwell Automation, Inc.
Industrial - Machinery
Market Cap$51.00B
5Y Perf.+110.0%
XYL
Xylem Inc.
Industrial - Machinery
Market Cap$27.04B
5Y Perf.+71.5%
ITT vs HON vs EMR vs ROK vs XYL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ITT | HON | EMR | ROK | XYL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Conglomerates | Industrial - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $18.43B | $135.04B | $79.14B | $51.00B | $27.04B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.24B | $36.76B | $18.32B | $8.80B | $9.09B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $458M | $4.10B | $2.44B | $1.09B | $973M |
| Gross Margin | 35.5% | 36.9% | 52.7% | 52.5% | 38.6% |
| Operating Margin | 15.9% | 14.9% | 19.8% | 19.1% | 13.6% |
| Forward P/E | 26.8x | 20.2x | 21.7x | 35.4x | 20.6x |
| Total Debt | $927M | $34.58B | $13.76B | $3.65B | $1.94B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.74B | $12.49B | $1.54B | $468M | $1.48B |
ITT vs HON vs EMR vs ROK vs XYL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
ITT
HON
EMR
ROK
XYL
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ITT Inc. (ITT) | 100 | 357.3 | +257.3% |
| Honeywell Internati… (HON) | 100 | 146.1 | +46.1% |
| Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) | 100 | 231.5 | +131.5% |
| Rockwell Automation… (ROK) | 100 | 210.0 | +110.0% |
| Xylem Inc. (XYL) | 100 | 171.5 | +71.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ITT vs HON vs EMR vs ROK vs XYL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: HON leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. Rockwell Automation, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment and operational efficiency and capital deployment. ITT and EMR also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
ITT
ITT Inc.
The Growth Play
ITT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 8.5%, EPS growth -3.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.6%
- 5.3% 10Y total return vs ROK's 346.0%
- PEG 0.55 vs HON's 11.03
- 8.5% revenue growth vs ROK's 1.0%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
HON
Honeywell International Inc.
The Income Pick
HON carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.74, yield 2.2%
- Beta 0.74, yield 2.2%, current ratio 1.32x
- Lower P/E (20.2x vs 20.6x)
- Beta 0.74 vs EMR's 1.57
Best for: income & stability and defensive
EMR
Emerson Electric Co.
The Quality Compounder
EMR is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.
- 13.3% margin vs XYL's 10.7%
Best for: quality
ROK
Rockwell Automation, Inc.
The Momentum Pick
ROK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum and efficiency is your priority.
- +57.7% vs XYL's -6.4%
- 9.7% ROA vs HON's 5.3%, ROIC 15.1% vs 12.6%
Best for: momentum and efficiency
XYL
Xylem Inc.
The Defensive Pick
XYL is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.90, Low D/E 16.5%, current ratio 1.63x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | ITT | 8.5% revenue growth vs ROK's 1.0% |
| Value | HON | Lower P/E (20.2x vs 20.6x) |
| Quality / Margins | EMR | 13.3% margin vs XYL's 10.7% |
| Stability / Safety | HON | Beta 0.74 vs EMR's 1.57 |
| Dividends | HON | 2.2% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs EMR's 1.5% |
| Momentum (1Y) | ROK | +57.7% vs XYL's -6.4% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | ROK | 9.7% ROA vs HON's 5.3%, ROIC 15.1% vs 12.6% |
ITT vs HON vs EMR vs ROK vs XYL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2022
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2025
ITT vs HON vs EMR vs ROK vs XYL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLITTLAGGINGXYL
Who Leads Where
EMR leads in 1 of 6 categories
ROK leads 1 • ITT leads 1 • HON leads 0 • XYL leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓XYLXylem Inc.
0leads
HONHoneywell Internation…
0leads
ROKRockwell Automation, …
1leads
EMREmerson Electric Co.
1leads
ITTITT Inc.
1leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs EMRvs ROKMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
EMR4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
ROK4/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
ITT5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EMR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HON is the larger business by revenue, generating $36.8B annually — 8.7x ITT's $4.2B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 13.3% (EMR) to 10.7% (XYL). On growth, ITT holds the edge at +32.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ITTITT Inc. | HONHoneywell Interna… | EMREmerson Electric … | ROKRockwell Automati… | XYLXylem Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.2B | $36.8B | $18.3B | $8.8B | $9.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $781M | $6.5B | $4.7B | $1.9B | $1.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $458M | $4.1B | $2.4B | $1.1B | $973M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $485M | $4.2B | $3.1B | $1.3B | $966M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +35.5% | +36.9% | +52.7% | +52.5% | +38.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.9% | +14.9% | +19.8% | +19.1% | +13.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.8% | +11.2% | +13.3% | +12.4% | +10.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.4% | +11.4% | +17.0% | +15.2% | +10.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +32.7% | -6.9% | +2.9% | +11.8% | +2.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -33.1% | -41.9% | +28.2% | +39.6% | +14.5% |
EMR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — HON and XYL each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 29.0x trailing earnings, HON trades at a 51% valuation discount to ROK's 59.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ITT offers better value at 0.69x vs HON's 15.77x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ITTITT Inc. | HONHoneywell Interna… | EMREmerson Electric … | ROKRockwell Automati… | XYLXylem Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $18.4B | $135.0B | $79.1B | $51.0B | $27.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $17.6B | $157.1B | $91.4B | $54.2B | $27.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 33.74x | 28.96x | 34.97x | 59.18x | 29.02x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 26.81x | 20.24x | 21.70x | 35.38x | 20.56x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.69x | 15.77x | 7.74x | — | 1.27x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.28x | 19.75x | 18.09x | 30.99x | 15.29x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.68x | 3.61x | 4.39x | 6.11x | 2.99x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.03x | 8.87x | 3.94x | 13.83x | 2.36x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 33.66x | 25.04x | 29.67x | 37.55x | 29.71x |
Evenly matched — HON and XYL each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ROK leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ROK delivers a 29.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $30 in annual profit, vs $9 for XYL. XYL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HON's 2.24x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ROK scores 8/9 vs XYL's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ITTITT Inc. | HONHoneywell Interna… | EMREmerson Electric … | ROKRockwell Automati… | XYLXylem Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.0% | +23.1% | +12.1% | +29.6% | +8.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.7% | +5.3% | +5.8% | +9.7% | +5.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +16.1% | +12.6% | +8.2% | +15.1% | +7.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +16.3% | +12.6% | +10.0% | +18.5% | +8.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.23x | 2.24x | 0.68x | 0.98x | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$816M | $22.1B | $12.2B | $3.2B | $463M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.7B | $12.5B | $1.5B | $468M | $1.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $927M | $34.6B | $13.8B | $3.6B | $1.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 8.60x | 3.92x | 6.46x | 9.06x | 49.32x |
ROK leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ITT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ITT five years ago would be worth $21,264 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,064 for XYL. Over the past 12 months, ROK leads with a +57.7% total return vs XYL's -6.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ITT at 35.9% vs XYL's 3.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ITTITT Inc. | HONHoneywell Interna… | EMREmerson Electric … | ROKRockwell Automati… | XYLXylem Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +18.6% | +9.4% | +4.4% | +14.2% | -16.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +44.7% | +1.5% | +27.7% | +57.7% | -6.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +150.7% | +14.7% | +76.2% | +66.9% | +10.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +112.6% | +1.0% | +59.1% | +76.6% | +0.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +527.0% | +132.4% | +207.0% | +346.0% | +200.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +35.9% | +4.7% | +20.8% | +18.6% | +3.3% |
ITT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HON and ROK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HON is the less volatile stock with a 0.74 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than EMR's 1.57 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ROK currently trades 97.9% from its 52-week high vs XYL's 73.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ITTITT Inc. | HONHoneywell Interna… | EMREmerson Electric … | ROKRockwell Automati… | XYLXylem Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.23x | 0.74x | 1.57x | 1.38x | 0.90x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $225.26 | $248.18 | $165.15 | $463.49 | $154.27 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $141.92 | $186.76 | $109.53 | $285.95 | $113.46 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.5% | +85.9% | +85.6% | +97.9% | +73.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.5 | 44.2 | 51.4 | 68.2 | 40.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 876K | 3.7M | 2.8M | 827K | 2.1M |
Evenly matched — HON and ROK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — HON and EMR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ITT as "Buy", HON as "Buy", EMR as "Buy", ROK as "Hold", XYL as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 33.3% upside for XYL (target: $152) vs 2.4% for ROK (target: $465). For income investors, HON offers the higher dividend yield at 2.17% vs ITT's 0.67%.
| Metric | ITTITT Inc. | HONHoneywell Interna… | EMREmerson Electric … | ROKRockwell Automati… | XYLXylem Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $241.67 | $243.83 | $161.31 | $464.75 | $151.57 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 22 | 28 | 41 | 39 | 40 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.7% | +2.2% | +1.5% | +1.2% | +1.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 13 | 15 | 37 | 20 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.39 | $4.63 | $2.10 | $5.23 | $1.60 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.8% | +2.8% | +1.6% | +0.8% | +0.1% |
Evenly matched — HON and EMR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
EMR leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). ROK leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
Best OverallITT Inc. (ITT)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
ITT vs HON vs EMR vs ROK vs XYL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ITT or HON or EMR or ROK or XYL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ITT Inc.
(ITT) is the stronger pick with 8. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 0% for Rockwell Automation, Inc. (ROK). Honeywell International Inc. (HON) offers the better valuation at 29. 0x trailing P/E (20. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ITT Inc. (ITT) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ITT or HON or EMR or ROK or XYL?
On trailing P/E, Honeywell International Inc.
(HON) is the cheapest at 29. 0x versus Rockwell Automation, Inc. at 59. 2x. On forward P/E, Honeywell International Inc. is actually cheaper at 20. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: ITT Inc. wins at 0. 55x versus Honeywell International Inc. 's 11. 03x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ITT or HON or EMR or ROK or XYL?
Over the past 5 years, ITT Inc.
(ITT) delivered a total return of +112. 6%, compared to +0. 6% for Xylem Inc. (XYL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ITT returned +527. 0% versus HON's +132. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ITT or HON or EMR or ROK or XYL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Honeywell International Inc.
(HON) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 74β versus Emerson Electric Co. 's 1. 57β — meaning EMR is approximately 111% more volatile than HON relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Xylem Inc. (XYL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 2% for Honeywell International Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ITT or HON or EMR or ROK or XYL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ITT Inc.
(ITT) is pulling ahead at 8. 5% versus 1. 0% for Rockwell Automation, Inc. (ROK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Emerson Electric Co. grew EPS 17. 8% year-over-year, compared to -15. 5% for Honeywell International Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, XYL leads at 17. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ITT or HON or EMR or ROK or XYL?
Emerson Electric Co.
(EMR) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 7% net margin versus 10. 4% for Rockwell Automation, Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EMR leads at 19. 6% versus 13. 5% for XYL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EMR leads at 52. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ITT or HON or EMR or ROK or XYL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, ITT Inc. (ITT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 55x versus Honeywell International Inc. 's 11. 03x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Honeywell International Inc. (HON) trades at 20. 2x forward P/E versus 35. 4x for Rockwell Automation, Inc. — 15. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for XYL: 33. 3% to $151. 57.
08Which pays a better dividend — ITT or HON or EMR or ROK or XYL?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Honeywell International Inc. (HON) offers the highest yield at 2. 2%, versus 0. 7% for ITT Inc. (ITT).
09Is ITT or HON or EMR or ROK or XYL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Honeywell International Inc.
(HON) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 74), 2. 2% yield, +132. 4% 10Y return). Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) carries a higher beta of 1. 57 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HON: +132. 4%, EMR: +207. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ITT and HON and EMR and ROK and XYL?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
Revenue Growth>
%
(ITT: 32.7% · HON: -6.9%)Net Margin>
%
(ITT: 10.8% · HON: 11.2%)P/E Ratio<
x
(ITT: 33.7x · HON: 29.0x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.