Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
IVVD vs REGN vs VRTX vs ALNY vs ABBV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Drug Manufacturers - General
IVVD vs REGN vs VRTX vs ALNY vs ABBV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - General |
| Market Cap | $102M | $63.60B | $113.17B | $37.74B | $402.80B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $56M | $14.92B | $12.26B | $4.29B | $61.16B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-78M | $4.42B | $4.34B | $577M | $4.23B |
| Gross Margin | 92.0% | 84.5% | 86.3% | 80.9% | 70.2% |
| Operating Margin | -146.4% | 24.3% | 39.0% | 17.5% | 26.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 13.2x | 23.0x | 37.7x | 16.0x |
| Total Debt | $2M | $2.71B | $3.88B | $1.28B | $69.07B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $227M | $3.12B | $5.09B | $1.66B | $5.23B |
IVVD vs REGN vs VRTX vs ALNY vs ABBV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 21 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Invivyd, Inc. (IVVD) | 100 | 2.3 | -97.7% |
| Regeneron Pharmaceu… (REGN) | 100 | 90.9 | -9.1% |
| Vertex Pharmaceutic… (VRTX) | 100 | 222.1 | +122.1% |
| Alnylam Pharmaceuti… (ALNY) | 100 | 140.4 | +40.4% |
| AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) | 100 | 188.5 | +88.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IVVD vs REGN vs VRTX vs ALNY vs ABBV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IVVD ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.
- 110.5% revenue growth vs REGN's 1.0%
REGN is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.51, Low D/E 8.7%, current ratio 4.13x
- PEG 2.08 vs VRTX's 2.78
- Lower P/E (13.2x vs 16.0x)
VRTX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 391.4% 10Y total return vs ALNY's 366.4%
- 35.4% margin vs IVVD's -138.9%
- 17.1% ROA vs IVVD's -41.6%, ROIC 23.0% vs -494.9%
ALNY is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 65.2%, EPS growth 206.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 53.0%
ABBV carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 43 yrs, beta 0.14, yield 2.9%
- Beta 0.14, yield 2.9%, current ratio 0.67x
- Beta 0.14 vs IVVD's 2.03
- 2.9% yield, 43-year raise streak, vs REGN's 0.6%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 110.5% revenue growth vs REGN's 1.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.2x vs 16.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 35.4% margin vs IVVD's -138.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.14 vs IVVD's 2.03 | |
| Dividends | 2.9% yield, 43-year raise streak, vs REGN's 0.6%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +21.9% vs IVVD's -9.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 17.1% ROA vs IVVD's -41.6%, ROIC 23.0% vs -494.9% |
IVVD vs REGN vs VRTX vs ALNY vs ABBV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
IVVD vs REGN vs VRTX vs ALNY vs ABBV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ABBV leads in 3 of 6 categories
REGN leads 1 • VRTX leads 1 • IVVD leads 0 • ALNY leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — VRTX and ABBV each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ABBV is the larger business by revenue, generating $61.2B annually — 1094.8x IVVD's $56M. VRTX is the more profitable business, keeping 35.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IVVD's -138.9%. On growth, ALNY holds the edge at +96.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $56M | $14.9B | $12.3B | $4.3B | $61.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$80M | $4.2B | $4.9B | $677M | $24.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$78M | $4.4B | $4.3B | $577M | $4.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$79M | $4.2B | $3.7B | $641M | $18.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +92.0% | +84.5% | +86.3% | +80.9% | +70.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -146.4% | +24.3% | +39.0% | +17.5% | +26.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -138.9% | +29.6% | +35.4% | +13.5% | +6.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -142.2% | +27.9% | +30.3% | +15.0% | +30.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +21.6% | +19.0% | +7.8% | +96.4% | +10.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.1% | -7.2% | +61.4% | +4.4% | +57.4% |
Valuation Metrics
REGN leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.8x trailing earnings, REGN trades at a 88% valuation discount to ALNY's 121.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), REGN offers better value at 2.33x vs VRTX's 3.51x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $102M | $63.6B | $113.2B | $37.7B | $402.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$122M | $63.2B | $112.0B | $37.4B | $466.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.57x | 14.76x | 29.04x | 121.39x | 96.09x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 13.18x | 23.05x | 37.74x | 15.96x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.33x | 3.51x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 15.33x | 22.54x | 67.05x | 16.53x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.91x | 4.43x | 9.37x | 10.16x | 6.59x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.55x | 2.13x | 6.15x | 48.27x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 15.59x | 35.43x | 81.09x | 22.61x |
Profitability & Efficiency
VRTX leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ABBV delivers a 62.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $62 in annual profit, vs $-53 for IVVD. IVVD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ALNY's 1.62x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ALNY scores 6/9 vs IVVD's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -53.5% | +14.3% | +23.9% | +98.3% | +62.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -41.6% | +11.1% | +17.1% | +11.8% | +3.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -4.9% | +8.9% | +23.0% | +33.4% | +23.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -35.8% | +10.2% | +23.1% | +15.3% | +21.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.09x | 0.21x | 1.62x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$224M | -$412M | -$1.2B | -$379M | $63.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $227M | $3.1B | $5.1B | $1.7B | $5.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $2.7B | $3.9B | $1.3B | $69.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 108.44x | 488.09x | 2.02x | 3.28x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ABBV leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in VRTX five years ago would be worth $22,840 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $369 for IVVD. Over the past 12 months, ABBV leads with a +21.9% total return vs IVVD's -9.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ABBV at 21.5% vs IVVD's -16.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -69.2% | -20.9% | -1.6% | -29.3% | +0.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -9.1% | +18.0% | -3.3% | -7.2% | +21.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -40.8% | -18.1% | +30.6% | +46.5% | +79.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.3% | +16.8% | +128.4% | +69.7% | +123.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.3% | +68.2% | +391.4% | +366.4% | +362.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -16.0% | -6.4% | +9.3% | +13.6% | +21.5% |
Risk & Volatility
ABBV leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ABBV is the less volatile stock with a 0.14 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IVVD's 2.03 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ABBV currently trades 93.0% from its 52-week high vs IVVD's 25.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.03x | 0.51x | 0.68x | 0.60x | 0.14x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.07 | $821.11 | $507.92 | $495.55 | $244.81 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.48 | $503.25 | $362.50 | $281.76 | $181.73 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +25.1% | +74.6% | +87.6% | +57.1% | +93.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 26.0 | 37.5 | 53.9 | 44.0 | 62.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.2M | 868K | 1.1M | 1.0M | 4.6M |
Analyst Outlook
ABBV leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: IVVD as "Buy", REGN as "Buy", VRTX as "Buy", ALNY as "Buy", ABBV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 1133.8% upside for IVVD (target: $10) vs 12.8% for ABBV (target: $257). For income investors, ABBV offers the higher dividend yield at 2.89% vs REGN's 0.56%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $9.50 | $836.00 | $553.93 | $445.67 | $256.92 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 48 | 56 | 52 | 41 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.6% | — | — | +2.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | — | — | 43 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $3.41 | — | — | $6.57 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +6.2% | +1.8% | 0.0% | +0.2% |
ABBV leads in 3 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). REGN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
IVVD vs REGN vs VRTX vs ALNY vs ABBV: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IVVD or REGN or VRTX or ALNY or ABBV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Invivyd, Inc.
(IVVD) is the stronger pick with 110. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 0% for Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN). Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN) offers the better valuation at 14. 8x trailing P/E (13. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Invivyd, Inc. (IVVD) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IVVD or REGN or VRTX or ALNY or ABBV?
On trailing P/E, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(REGN) is the cheapest at 14. 8x versus Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. at 121. 4x. On forward P/E, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. wins at 2. 08x versus Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated's 2. 78x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IVVD or REGN or VRTX or ALNY or ABBV?
Over the past 5 years, Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (VRTX) delivered a total return of +128.
4%, compared to -96. 3% for Invivyd, Inc. (IVVD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VRTX returned +391. 4% versus IVVD's -96. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IVVD or REGN or VRTX or ALNY or ABBV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 14β versus Invivyd, Inc. 's 2. 03β — meaning IVVD is approximately 1393% more volatile than ABBV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Invivyd, Inc. (IVVD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 162% for Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — IVVD or REGN or VRTX or ALNY or ABBV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Invivyd, Inc.
(IVVD) is pulling ahead at 110. 5% versus 1. 0% for Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated grew EPS 836. 5% year-over-year, compared to -0. 8% for AbbVie Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ALNY leads at 53. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — IVVD or REGN or VRTX or ALNY or ABBV?
Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (VRTX) is the more profitable company, earning 32.
7% net margin versus -98. 2% for Invivyd, Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VRTX leads at 39. 4% versus -104. 0% for IVVD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IVVD leads at 93. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is IVVD or REGN or VRTX or ALNY or ABBV more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 08x versus Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated's 2. 78x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN) trades at 13. 2x forward P/E versus 37. 7x for Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — 24. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IVVD: 1133. 8% to $9. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — IVVD or REGN or VRTX or ALNY or ABBV?
In this comparison, ABBV (2.
9% yield), REGN (0. 6% yield) pay a dividend. IVVD, VRTX, ALNY do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is IVVD or REGN or VRTX or ALNY or ABBV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 14), 2. 9% yield, +362. 2% 10Y return). Invivyd, Inc. (IVVD) carries a higher beta of 2. 03 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ABBV: +362. 2%, IVVD: -96. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between IVVD and REGN and VRTX and ALNY and ABBV?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: IVVD is a small-cap high-growth stock; REGN is a mid-cap deep-value stock; VRTX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ALNY is a mid-cap high-growth stock; ABBV is a large-cap quality compounder stock. REGN, ABBV pay a dividend while IVVD, VRTX, ALNY do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.