Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
IVVD vs REGN vs VRTX vs KO vs ALNY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Biotechnology
IVVD vs REGN vs VRTX vs KO vs ALNY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $102M | $63.60B | $113.17B | $355.61B | $37.74B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $56M | $14.92B | $12.26B | $49.28B | $4.29B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-78M | $4.42B | $4.34B | $13.70B | $577M |
| Gross Margin | 92.0% | 84.5% | 86.3% | 61.7% | 80.9% |
| Operating Margin | -146.4% | 24.3% | 39.0% | 29.3% | 17.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 13.2x | 23.0x | 25.3x | 37.7x |
| Total Debt | $2M | $2.71B | $3.88B | $45.49B | $1.28B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $227M | $3.12B | $5.09B | $10.27B | $1.66B |
IVVD vs REGN vs VRTX vs KO vs ALNY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 21 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Invivyd, Inc. (IVVD) | 100 | 2.3 | -97.7% |
| Regeneron Pharmaceu… (REGN) | 100 | 90.9 | -9.1% |
| Vertex Pharmaceutic… (VRTX) | 100 | 222.1 | +122.1% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 146.7 | +46.7% |
| Alnylam Pharmaceuti… (ALNY) | 100 | 140.4 | +40.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IVVD vs REGN vs VRTX vs KO vs ALNY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IVVD ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.
- 110.5% revenue growth vs REGN's 1.0%
REGN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.51, Low D/E 8.7%, current ratio 4.13x
- PEG 2.08 vs VRTX's 2.78
- Beta 0.51, yield 0.6%, current ratio 4.13x
- Lower P/E (13.2x vs 37.7x)
VRTX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 391.4% 10Y total return vs ALNY's 366.4%
- 35.4% margin vs IVVD's -138.9%
- 17.1% ROA vs IVVD's -41.6%, ROIC 23.0% vs -494.9%
KO is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 56 yrs, beta -0.20, yield 2.5%
- 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs REGN's 0.6%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
ALNY is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 65.2%, EPS growth 206.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 53.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 110.5% revenue growth vs REGN's 1.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.2x vs 37.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 35.4% margin vs IVVD's -138.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.51 vs IVVD's 2.03 | |
| Dividends | 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs REGN's 0.6%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +18.0% vs IVVD's -9.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 17.1% ROA vs IVVD's -41.6%, ROIC 23.0% vs -494.9% |
IVVD vs REGN vs VRTX vs KO vs ALNY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
IVVD vs REGN vs VRTX vs KO vs ALNY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KO leads in 3 of 6 categories
VRTX leads 2 • REGN leads 1 • IVVD leads 0 • ALNY leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VRTX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO is the larger business by revenue, generating $49.3B annually — 882.2x IVVD's $56M. VRTX is the more profitable business, keeping 35.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IVVD's -138.9%. On growth, ALNY holds the edge at +96.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $56M | $14.9B | $12.3B | $49.3B | $4.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$80M | $4.2B | $4.9B | $15.5B | $677M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$78M | $4.4B | $4.3B | $13.7B | $577M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$79M | $4.2B | $3.7B | $12.6B | $641M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +92.0% | +84.5% | +86.3% | +61.7% | +80.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -146.4% | +24.3% | +39.0% | +29.3% | +17.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -138.9% | +29.6% | +35.4% | +27.8% | +13.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -142.2% | +27.9% | +30.3% | +25.5% | +15.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +21.6% | +19.0% | +7.8% | +12.1% | +96.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.1% | -7.2% | +61.4% | +18.2% | +4.4% |
Valuation Metrics
REGN leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.8x trailing earnings, REGN trades at a 88% valuation discount to ALNY's 121.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), REGN offers better value at 2.33x vs VRTX's 3.51x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $102M | $63.6B | $113.2B | $355.6B | $37.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$122M | $63.2B | $112.0B | $390.8B | $37.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.57x | 14.76x | 29.04x | 27.18x | 121.39x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 13.18x | 23.05x | 25.27x | 37.74x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.33x | 3.51x | 2.43x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 15.33x | 22.54x | 26.39x | 67.05x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.91x | 4.43x | 9.37x | 7.42x | 10.16x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.55x | 2.13x | 6.15x | 10.40x | 48.27x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 15.59x | 35.43x | 67.15x | 81.09x |
Profitability & Efficiency
VRTX leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ALNY delivers a 98.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $98 in annual profit, vs $-53 for IVVD. IVVD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ALNY's 1.62x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs IVVD's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -53.5% | +14.3% | +23.9% | +41.1% | +98.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -41.6% | +11.1% | +17.1% | +13.1% | +11.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -4.9% | +8.9% | +23.0% | +15.8% | +33.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -35.8% | +10.2% | +23.1% | +17.3% | +15.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.09x | 0.21x | 1.33x | 1.62x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$224M | -$412M | -$1.2B | $35.2B | -$379M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $227M | $3.1B | $5.1B | $10.3B | $1.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $2.7B | $3.9B | $45.5B | $1.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 108.44x | 488.09x | 10.70x | 2.02x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in VRTX five years ago would be worth $22,840 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $369 for IVVD. Over the past 12 months, REGN leads with a +18.0% total return vs IVVD's -9.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KO at 13.7% vs IVVD's -16.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -69.2% | -20.9% | -1.6% | +20.3% | -29.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -9.1% | +18.0% | -3.3% | +17.2% | -7.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -40.8% | -18.1% | +30.6% | +47.0% | +46.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.3% | +16.8% | +128.4% | +65.6% | +69.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.3% | +68.2% | +391.4% | +121.1% | +366.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -16.0% | -6.4% | +9.3% | +13.7% | +13.6% |
Risk & Volatility
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IVVD's 2.03 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs IVVD's 25.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.03x | 0.51x | 0.68x | -0.20x | 0.60x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.07 | $821.11 | $507.92 | $84.04 | $495.55 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.48 | $503.25 | $362.50 | $65.35 | $281.76 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +25.1% | +74.6% | +87.6% | +98.3% | +57.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 26.0 | 37.5 | 53.9 | 60.6 | 44.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.2M | 868K | 1.1M | 12.7M | 1.0M |
Analyst Outlook
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: IVVD as "Buy", REGN as "Buy", VRTX as "Buy", KO as "Buy", ALNY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 1133.8% upside for IVVD (target: $10) vs 4.2% for KO (target: $86). For income investors, KO offers the higher dividend yield at 2.46% vs REGN's 0.56%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $9.50 | $836.00 | $553.93 | $86.13 | $445.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 48 | 56 | 48 | 52 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.6% | — | +2.5% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | — | 56 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $3.41 | — | $2.04 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +6.2% | +1.8% | +0.2% | 0.0% |
KO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). VRTX leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency).
IVVD vs REGN vs VRTX vs KO vs ALNY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IVVD or REGN or VRTX or KO or ALNY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Invivyd, Inc.
(IVVD) is the stronger pick with 110. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 0% for Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN). Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN) offers the better valuation at 14. 8x trailing P/E (13. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Invivyd, Inc. (IVVD) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IVVD or REGN or VRTX or KO or ALNY?
On trailing P/E, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(REGN) is the cheapest at 14. 8x versus Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. at 121. 4x. On forward P/E, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. wins at 2. 08x versus Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated's 2. 78x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IVVD or REGN or VRTX or KO or ALNY?
Over the past 5 years, Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (VRTX) delivered a total return of +128.
4%, compared to -96. 3% for Invivyd, Inc. (IVVD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VRTX returned +391. 4% versus IVVD's -96. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IVVD or REGN or VRTX or KO or ALNY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus Invivyd, Inc. 's 2. 03β — meaning IVVD is approximately -1115% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Invivyd, Inc. (IVVD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 162% for Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — IVVD or REGN or VRTX or KO or ALNY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Invivyd, Inc.
(IVVD) is pulling ahead at 110. 5% versus 1. 0% for Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated grew EPS 836. 5% year-over-year, compared to 8. 2% for Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ALNY leads at 53. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — IVVD or REGN or VRTX or KO or ALNY?
Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (VRTX) is the more profitable company, earning 32.
7% net margin versus -98. 2% for Invivyd, Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VRTX leads at 39. 4% versus -104. 0% for IVVD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IVVD leads at 93. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is IVVD or REGN or VRTX or KO or ALNY more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 08x versus Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated's 2. 78x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN) trades at 13. 2x forward P/E versus 37. 7x for Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — 24. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IVVD: 1133. 8% to $9. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — IVVD or REGN or VRTX or KO or ALNY?
In this comparison, KO (2.
5% yield), REGN (0. 6% yield) pay a dividend. IVVD, VRTX, ALNY do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is IVVD or REGN or VRTX or KO or ALNY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Invivyd, Inc. (IVVD) carries a higher beta of 2. 03 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, IVVD: -96. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between IVVD and REGN and VRTX and KO and ALNY?
These companies operate in different sectors (IVVD (Healthcare) and REGN (Healthcare) and VRTX (Healthcare) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and ALNY (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: IVVD is a small-cap high-growth stock; REGN is a mid-cap deep-value stock; VRTX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; ALNY is a mid-cap high-growth stock. REGN, KO pay a dividend while IVVD, VRTX, ALNY do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.