Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
IVVD vs VRTX vs REGN vs ALNY vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Banks - Diversified
IVVD vs VRTX vs REGN vs ALNY vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $102M | $113.17B | $63.60B | $37.74B | $896.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $56M | $12.26B | $14.92B | $4.29B | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-78M | $4.34B | $4.42B | $577M | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 92.0% | 86.3% | 84.5% | 80.9% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | -146.4% | 39.0% | 24.3% | 17.5% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 23.0x | 13.2x | 37.7x | 14.4x |
| Total Debt | $2M | $3.88B | $2.71B | $1.28B | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $227M | $5.09B | $3.12B | $1.66B | $343.34B |
IVVD vs VRTX vs REGN vs ALNY vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 21 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Invivyd, Inc. (IVVD) | 100 | 2.3 | -97.7% |
| Vertex Pharmaceutic… (VRTX) | 100 | 222.1 | +122.1% |
| Regeneron Pharmaceu… (REGN) | 100 | 90.9 | -9.1% |
| Alnylam Pharmaceuti… (ALNY) | 100 | 140.4 | +40.4% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 200.5 | +100.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IVVD vs VRTX vs REGN vs ALNY vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IVVD ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.
- 110.5% revenue growth vs REGN's 1.0%
VRTX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 35.4% margin vs IVVD's -138.9%
- 17.1% ROA vs IVVD's -41.6%, ROIC 23.0% vs -494.9%
REGN is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.51, Low D/E 8.7%, current ratio 4.13x
- Beta 0.51, yield 0.6%, current ratio 4.13x
- Beta 0.51 vs IVVD's 2.03
ALNY is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 65.2%, EPS growth 206.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 53.0%
JPM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.94, yield 1.9%
- 465.8% 10Y total return vs VRTX's 391.4%
- PEG 0.81 vs VRTX's 2.78
- Lower P/E (14.4x vs 37.7x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 110.5% revenue growth vs REGN's 1.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.4x vs 37.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 35.4% margin vs IVVD's -138.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.51 vs IVVD's 2.03 | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs REGN's 0.6%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +21.8% vs IVVD's -9.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 17.1% ROA vs IVVD's -41.6%, ROIC 23.0% vs -494.9% |
IVVD vs VRTX vs REGN vs ALNY vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
IVVD vs VRTX vs REGN vs ALNY vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
JPM leads in 2 of 6 categories
IVVD leads 1 • VRTX leads 1 • REGN leads 0 • ALNY leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — VRTX and ALNY each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 5018.0x IVVD's $56M. VRTX is the more profitable business, keeping 35.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IVVD's -138.9%. On growth, ALNY holds the edge at +96.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $56M | $12.3B | $14.9B | $4.3B | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$80M | $4.9B | $4.2B | $677M | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$78M | $4.3B | $4.4B | $577M | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$79M | $3.7B | $4.2B | $641M | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +92.0% | +86.3% | +84.5% | +80.9% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -146.4% | +39.0% | +24.3% | +17.5% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -138.9% | +35.4% | +29.6% | +13.5% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -142.2% | +30.3% | +27.9% | +15.0% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +21.6% | +7.8% | +19.0% | +96.4% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.1% | +61.4% | -7.2% | +4.4% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
IVVD leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.8x trailing earnings, REGN trades at a 88% valuation discount to ALNY's 121.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs VRTX's 3.51x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $102M | $113.2B | $63.6B | $37.7B | $896.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$122M | $112.0B | $63.2B | $37.4B | $1.50T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.57x | 29.04x | 14.76x | 121.39x | 16.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 23.05x | 13.18x | 37.74x | 14.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 3.51x | 2.33x | — | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 22.54x | 15.33x | 67.05x | 18.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.91x | 9.37x | 4.43x | 10.16x | 3.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.55x | 6.15x | 2.13x | 48.27x | 2.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 35.43x | 15.59x | 81.09x | 8.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
VRTX leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ALNY delivers a 98.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $98 in annual profit, vs $-53 for IVVD. IVVD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ALNY scores 6/9 vs IVVD's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -53.5% | +23.9% | +14.3% | +98.3% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -41.6% | +17.1% | +11.1% | +11.8% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -4.9% | +23.0% | +8.9% | +33.4% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -35.8% | +23.1% | +10.2% | +15.3% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.21x | 0.09x | 1.62x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$224M | -$1.2B | -$412M | -$379M | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $227M | $5.1B | $3.1B | $1.7B | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $3.9B | $2.7B | $1.3B | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 488.09x | 108.44x | 2.02x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in VRTX five years ago would be worth $22,840 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $369 for IVVD. Over the past 12 months, JPM leads with a +21.8% total return vs IVVD's -9.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs IVVD's -16.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -69.2% | -1.6% | -20.9% | -29.3% | -0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -9.1% | -3.3% | +18.0% | -7.2% | +21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -40.8% | +30.6% | -18.1% | +46.5% | +138.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.3% | +128.4% | +16.8% | +69.7% | +118.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.3% | +391.4% | +68.2% | +366.4% | +465.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -16.0% | +9.3% | -6.4% | +13.6% | +33.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — REGN and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
REGN is the less volatile stock with a 0.51 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IVVD's 2.03 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 95.1% from its 52-week high vs IVVD's 25.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.03x | 0.68x | 0.51x | 0.60x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.07 | $507.92 | $821.11 | $495.55 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.48 | $362.50 | $503.25 | $281.76 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +25.1% | +87.6% | +74.6% | +57.1% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 26.0 | 53.9 | 37.5 | 44.0 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.2M | 1.1M | 868K | 1.0M | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: IVVD as "Buy", VRTX as "Buy", REGN as "Buy", ALNY as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 1133.8% upside for IVVD (target: $10) vs 5.9% for JPM (target: $340). For income investors, JPM offers the higher dividend yield at 1.86% vs REGN's 0.56%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $9.50 | $553.93 | $836.00 | $445.67 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 56 | 48 | 52 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.6% | — | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | — | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $3.41 | — | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.8% | +6.2% | 0.0% | +3.9% |
JPM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). IVVD leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
IVVD vs VRTX vs REGN vs ALNY vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IVVD or VRTX or REGN or ALNY or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Invivyd, Inc.
(IVVD) is the stronger pick with 110. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 0% for Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN). Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN) offers the better valuation at 14. 8x trailing P/E (13. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Invivyd, Inc. (IVVD) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IVVD or VRTX or REGN or ALNY or JPM?
On trailing P/E, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(REGN) is the cheapest at 14. 8x versus Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. at 121. 4x. On forward P/E, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 81x versus Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated's 2. 78x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IVVD or VRTX or REGN or ALNY or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (VRTX) delivered a total return of +128.
4%, compared to -96. 3% for Invivyd, Inc. (IVVD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus IVVD's -96. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IVVD or VRTX or REGN or ALNY or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(REGN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 51β versus Invivyd, Inc. 's 2. 03β — meaning IVVD is approximately 302% more volatile than REGN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Invivyd, Inc. (IVVD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — IVVD or VRTX or REGN or ALNY or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Invivyd, Inc.
(IVVD) is pulling ahead at 110. 5% versus 1. 0% for Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated grew EPS 836. 5% year-over-year, compared to 1. 5% for JPMorgan Chase & Co.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ALNY leads at 53. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — IVVD or VRTX or REGN or ALNY or JPM?
Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (VRTX) is the more profitable company, earning 32.
7% net margin versus -98. 2% for Invivyd, Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VRTX leads at 39. 4% versus -104. 0% for IVVD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IVVD leads at 93. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is IVVD or VRTX or REGN or ALNY or JPM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated's 2. 78x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN) trades at 13. 2x forward P/E versus 37. 7x for Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — 24. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IVVD: 1133. 8% to $9. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — IVVD or VRTX or REGN or ALNY or JPM?
In this comparison, JPM (1.
9% yield), REGN (0. 6% yield) pay a dividend. IVVD, VRTX, ALNY do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is IVVD or VRTX or REGN or ALNY or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(REGN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 51), 0. 6% yield). Invivyd, Inc. (IVVD) carries a higher beta of 2. 03 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (REGN: +68. 2%, IVVD: -96. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between IVVD and VRTX and REGN and ALNY and JPM?
These companies operate in different sectors (IVVD (Healthcare) and VRTX (Healthcare) and REGN (Healthcare) and ALNY (Healthcare) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: IVVD is a small-cap high-growth stock; VRTX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; REGN is a mid-cap deep-value stock; ALNY is a mid-cap high-growth stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. REGN, JPM pay a dividend while IVVD, VRTX, ALNY do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.