Financial - Credit Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
IX vs AL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Rental & Leasing Services
IX vs AL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Credit Services | Rental & Leasing Services |
| Market Cap | $36.71B | $7.26B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.87T | $3.02B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $439.78B | $1.09B |
| Gross Margin | 41.8% | 38.4% |
| Operating Margin | 11.5% | 29.5% |
| Forward P/E | 0.1x | 12.8x |
| Total Debt | $6.28T | $19.73B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.21T | $466M |
IX vs AL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ORIX Corporation (IX) | 100 | 251.3 | +151.3% |
| Air Lease Corporati… (AL) | 100 | 215.7 | +115.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IX vs AL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IX is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 172.9% 10Y total return vs AL's 129.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.89, current ratio 1.85x
- PEG 0.02 vs AL's 0.79
AL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.30, yield 1.3%
- Rev growth 10.3%, EPS growth 179.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.2%
- 10.3% revenue growth vs IX's 2.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.3% revenue growth vs IX's 2.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.1x vs 12.8x), PEG 0.02 vs 0.79 | |
| Quality / Margins | 36.1% margin vs IX's 12.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.30 vs IX's 0.89 | |
| Dividends | 2.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs AL's 1.3% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +69.0% vs AL's +22.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.3% ROA vs IX's 2.5%, ROIC 4.2% vs 2.4% |
IX vs AL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
IX vs AL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AL leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IX is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.87T annually — 953.3x AL's $3.0B. AL is the more profitable business, keeping 36.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IX's 12.2%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.87T | $3.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $717.3B | $2.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $439.8B | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | -$1.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +41.8% | +38.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +11.5% | +29.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.2% | +36.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +41.1% | -57.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +15.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +74.6% | +81.9% |
Valuation Metrics
AL leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.0x trailing earnings, AL trades at a 59% valuation discount to IX's 16.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AL offers better value at 0.43x vs IX's 3.18x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $36.7B | $7.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $69.2B | $6.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 16.90x | 7.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.08x | 12.76x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 3.18x | 0.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.79x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.00x | 2.41x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.42x | 0.86x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.86x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
AL leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AL delivers a 13.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $10 for IX. IX carries lower financial leverage with a 1.51x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AL's 2.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AL scores 8/9 vs IX's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.7% | +13.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.5% | +3.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.4% | +4.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.5% | +5.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.51x | 2.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5.08T | $19.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.21T | $466M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6.28T | $19.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.88x | 6.32x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IX five years ago would be worth $22,040 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $15,633 for AL. Over the past 12 months, IX leads with a +69.0% total return vs AL's +22.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IX at 27.4% vs AL's 21.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.6% | +1.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +69.0% | +22.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +106.9% | +79.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +120.4% | +56.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +172.9% | +129.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +27.4% | +21.6% |
Risk & Volatility
AL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AL is the less volatile stock with a 0.30 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IX's 0.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AL currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs IX's 89.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.89x | 0.30x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $37.04 | $65.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $19.90 | $51.66 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.6% | +100.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 66.9 | 66.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 430K | 2.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — IX and AL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, IX offers the higher dividend yield at 2.24% vs AL's 1.35%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $65.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 20 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.2% | +1.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 13 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $116.24 | $0.87 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.9% | 0.0% |
AL leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). IX leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
IX vs AL: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IX or AL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Air Lease Corporation (AL) is the stronger pick with 10.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 1% for ORIX Corporation (IX). Air Lease Corporation (AL) offers the better valuation at 7. 0x trailing P/E (12. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Air Lease Corporation (AL) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IX or AL?
On trailing P/E, Air Lease Corporation (AL) is the cheapest at 7.
0x versus ORIX Corporation at 16. 9x. On forward P/E, ORIX Corporation is actually cheaper at 0. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: ORIX Corporation wins at 0. 02x versus Air Lease Corporation's 0. 79x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IX or AL?
Over the past 5 years, ORIX Corporation (IX) delivered a total return of +120.
4%, compared to +56. 3% for Air Lease Corporation (AL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IX returned +172. 9% versus AL's +129. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IX or AL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Air Lease Corporation (AL) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
30β versus ORIX Corporation's 0. 89β — meaning IX is approximately 201% more volatile than AL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ORIX Corporation (IX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 151% versus 2% for Air Lease Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — IX or AL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Air Lease Corporation (AL) is pulling ahead at 10.
3% versus 2. 1% for ORIX Corporation (IX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Air Lease Corporation grew EPS 179. 0% year-over-year, compared to 3. 1% for ORIX Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — IX or AL?
Air Lease Corporation (AL) is the more profitable company, earning 36.
1% net margin versus 12. 2% for ORIX Corporation — meaning it keeps 36. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AL leads at 50. 5% versus 11. 5% for IX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AL leads at 59. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is IX or AL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, ORIX Corporation (IX) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 02x versus Air Lease Corporation's 0. 79x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, ORIX Corporation (IX) trades at 0. 1x forward P/E versus 12. 8x for Air Lease Corporation — 12. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — IX or AL?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
ORIX Corporation (IX) offers the highest yield at 2. 2%, versus 1. 3% for Air Lease Corporation (AL).
09Is IX or AL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Air Lease Corporation (AL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
30), 1. 3% yield, +129. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AL: +129. 9%, IX: +172. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between IX and AL?
These companies operate in different sectors (IX (Financial Services) and AL (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.