IZM
ICZOOM Group Inc.
Technology Distributors
Market Cap$1M
5Y Perf.-77.8%
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
IZM vs CODA vs LIQT vs MNDO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
CODA
Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
Aerospace & Defense
Market Cap$134M
5Y Perf.+62.6%
LIQT
LiqTech International, Inc.
Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls
Market Cap$22M
5Y Perf.-38.6%
MNDO
MIND C.T.I. Ltd
Software - Application
Market Cap$21M
5Y Perf.-49.0%
IZM vs CODA vs LIQT vs MNDO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | IZM | CODA | LIQT | MNDO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Technology Distributors | Aerospace & Defense | Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $1M | $134M | $22M | $21M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $362M | $28M | $17M | $19M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-667K | $4M | $-9M | $3M |
| Gross Margin | 2.8% | 66.3% | 4.9% | 51.0% |
| Operating Margin | -0.2% | 17.4% | -50.0% | 10.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 22.5x | — | 7.8x |
| Total Debt | $12M | $395K | $12M | $929K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $29M | — | $8M |
IZM vs CODA vs LIQT vs MNDO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
IZM
CODA
LIQT
MNDO
| Stock | Mar 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ICZOOM Group Inc. (IZM) | 100 | 22.2 | -77.8% |
| Coda Octopus Group,… (CODA) | 100 | 162.6 | +62.6% |
| LiqTech Internation… (LIQT) | 100 | 61.4 | -38.6% |
| MIND C.T.I. Ltd (MNDO) | 100 | 51.0 | -49.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IZM vs CODA vs LIQT vs MNDO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: MNDO leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. Coda Octopus Group, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
IZM
ICZOOM Group Inc.
The Lower-Volatility Pick
IZM plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
Best for: technology exposure
CODA
Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
The Growth Play
CODA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 30.7%, EPS growth 15.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.1%
- 8.4% 10Y total return vs MNDO's 66.7%
- 30.7% revenue growth vs IZM's -17.0%
- 14.8% margin vs LIQT's -53.3%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
LIQT
LiqTech International, Inc.
The Lower-Volatility Pick
LIQT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Best for: industrials exposure
MNDO
MIND C.T.I. Ltd
The Income Pick
MNDO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.07, yield 21.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.07, Low D/E 4.0%, current ratio 3.83x
- Beta 0.07, yield 21.6%, current ratio 3.83x
- Better valuation composite
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | CODA | 30.7% revenue growth vs IZM's -17.0% |
| Value | MNDO | Better valuation composite |
| Quality / Margins | CODA | 14.8% margin vs LIQT's -53.3% |
| Stability / Safety | MNDO | Beta 0.07 vs CODA's 1.00 |
| Dividends | MNDO | 21.6% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | CODA | +78.9% vs IZM's -81.6% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | MNDO | 8.6% ROA vs LIQT's -29.5%, ROIC 8.6% vs -31.1% |
IZM vs CODA vs LIQT vs MNDO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2024
FY 2025
FY 2024
FY 2025
IZM vs CODA vs LIQT vs MNDO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLCODALAGGINGMNDO
Who Leads Where
CODA leads in 3 of 6 categories
IZM leads 1 • LIQT leads 0 • MNDO leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓MNDOMIND C.T.I. Ltd
0leads
LIQTLiqTech International…
0leads
IZMICZOOM Group Inc.
1leads
CODACoda Octopus Group, I…
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs IZMvs LIQTMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
CODA4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
IZM3/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
CODA6/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
CODA5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CODA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IZM is the larger business by revenue, generating $362M annually — 21.6x LIQT's $17M. CODA is the more profitable business, keeping 14.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LIQT's -53.3%. On growth, LIQT holds the edge at +53.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | IZMICZOOM Group Inc. | CODACoda Octopus Grou… | LIQTLiqTech Internati… | MNDOMIND C.T.I. Ltd |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $362M | $28M | $17M | $19M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $184,236 | $6M | -$6M | $2M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$666,903 | $4M | -$9M | $3M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2M | $7M | -$7M | $4M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +2.8% | +66.3% | +4.9% | +51.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -0.2% | +17.4% | -50.0% | +10.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.2% | +14.8% | -53.3% | +13.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.4% | +24.6% | -39.3% | +20.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.0% | +28.8% | +53.6% | -6.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.0% | +3.0% | +69.4% | -23.4% |
CODA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
IZM leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.8x trailing earnings, MNDO trades at a 76% valuation discount to CODA's 32.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MNDO's 5.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CODA's 17.9x.
| Metric | IZMICZOOM Group Inc. | CODACoda Octopus Grou… | LIQTLiqTech Internati… | MNDOMIND C.T.I. Ltd |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1M | $134M | $22M | $21M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $11M | $106M | $34M | $13M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.74x | 32.16x | -2.59x | 7.77x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 22.45x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 7.51x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 17.85x | — | 5.68x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.01x | 5.05x | 1.35x | 1.06x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.26x | 2.30x | 2.14x | 0.90x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.76x | 22.20x | — | 5.20x |
IZM leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CODA leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MNDO delivers a 11.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-70 for LIQT. CODA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LIQT's 1.17x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CODA scores 7/9 vs LIQT's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | IZMICZOOM Group Inc. | CODACoda Octopus Grou… | LIQTLiqTech Internati… | MNDOMIND C.T.I. Ltd |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -4.3% | +7.2% | -70.0% | +11.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.5% | +6.6% | -29.5% | +8.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -4.1% | +11.2% | -31.1% | +8.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -8.6% | +8.1% | — | +7.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 | 2 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.79x | 0.01x | 1.17x | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $10M | -$28M | $12M | -$7M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $29M | — | $8M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $12M | $394,932 | $12M | $929,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.31x | — | -13.46x | — |
CODA leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CODA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CODA five years ago would be worth $14,969 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $391 for LIQT. Over the past 12 months, CODA leads with a +78.9% total return vs IZM's -81.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CODA at 10.4% vs IZM's -47.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | IZMICZOOM Group Inc. | CODACoda Octopus Grou… | LIQTLiqTech Internati… | MNDOMIND C.T.I. Ltd |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -85.1% | +25.1% | +54.9% | -13.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -81.6% | +78.9% | +64.8% | -34.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -85.9% | +34.5% | -31.3% | -24.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.4% | +49.7% | -96.1% | -35.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.4% | +844.4% | -90.9% | +66.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -47.9% | +10.4% | -11.8% | -8.8% |
CODA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — IZM and LIQT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IZM is the less volatile stock with a -0.74 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CODA's 1.00 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LIQT currently trades 68.9% from its 52-week high vs IZM's 14.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | IZMICZOOM Group Inc. | CODACoda Octopus Grou… | LIQTLiqTech Internati… | MNDOMIND C.T.I. Ltd |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.74x | 1.00x | 0.52x | 0.07x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.74 | $17.28 | $3.35 | $1.64 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.34 | $5.98 | $1.30 | $0.98 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +14.0% | +68.9% | +68.9% | +61.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.4 | 48.6 | 57.0 | 27.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.0M | 256K | 50K | 37K |
Evenly matched — IZM and LIQT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
MNDO is the only dividend payer here at 21.61% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | IZMICZOOM Group Inc. | CODACoda Octopus Grou… | LIQTLiqTech Internati… | MNDOMIND C.T.I. Ltd |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $14.00 | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 1 | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +21.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.22 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.6% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
CODA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). IZM leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Best OverallCoda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
IZM vs CODA vs LIQT vs MNDO: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IZM or CODA or LIQT or MNDO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
(CODA) is the stronger pick with 30. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -17. 0% for ICZOOM Group Inc. (IZM). MIND C. T. I. Ltd (MNDO) offers the better valuation at 7. 8x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IZM or CODA or LIQT or MNDO?
On trailing P/E, MIND C.
T. I. Ltd (MNDO) is the cheapest at 7. 8x versus Coda Octopus Group, Inc. at 32. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IZM or CODA or LIQT or MNDO?
Over the past 5 years, Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
(CODA) delivered a total return of +49. 7%, compared to -96. 1% for LiqTech International, Inc. (LIQT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CODA returned +844. 4% versus LIQT's -90. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IZM or CODA or LIQT or MNDO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ICZOOM Group Inc.
(IZM) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 74β versus Coda Octopus Group, Inc. 's 1. 00β — meaning CODA is approximately -236% more volatile than IZM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 117% for LiqTech International, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — IZM or CODA or LIQT or MNDO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
(CODA) is pulling ahead at 30. 7% versus -17. 0% for ICZOOM Group Inc. (IZM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: LiqTech International, Inc. grew EPS 45. 7% year-over-year, compared to -229. 4% for ICZOOM Group Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CODA leads at 6. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — IZM or CODA or LIQT or MNDO?
Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
(CODA) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 5% net margin versus -51. 7% for LiqTech International, Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CODA leads at 17. 1% versus -50. 3% for LIQT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CODA leads at 66. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — IZM or CODA or LIQT or MNDO?
In this comparison, MNDO (21.
6% yield) pays a dividend. IZM, CODA, LIQT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is IZM or CODA or LIQT or MNDO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, ICZOOM Group Inc.
(IZM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 74)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (IZM: -88. 4%, LIQT: -90. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between IZM and CODA and LIQT and MNDO?
These companies operate in different sectors (IZM (Technology) and CODA (Industrials) and LIQT (Industrials) and MNDO (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: IZM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CODA is a small-cap high-growth stock; LIQT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MNDO is a small-cap deep-value stock. MNDO pays a dividend while IZM, CODA, LIQT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
Revenue Growth>
%
(IZM: 3.0% · CODA: 28.8%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.