Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
JAGX vs IRWD vs PTGX vs PRGO vs MCK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Biotechnology
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Medical - Distribution
JAGX vs IRWD vs PTGX vs PRGO vs MCK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Medical - Distribution |
| Market Cap | $199K | $680M | $6.36B | $1.61B | $92.15B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $12M | $362M | $18M | $4.18B | $403.43B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-54M | $151M | $-115M | $-1.82B | $4.76B |
| Gross Margin | 67.2% | 70.4% | 100.0% | 34.2% | 3.6% |
| Operating Margin | -398.8% | 55.3% | -8.1% | -4.1% | 1.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 3.1x | 25.8x | 5.5x | 16.7x |
| Total Debt | $44M | $598M | $10M | $3.97B | $7.39B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $968K | $215M | $128M | $532M | $5.69B |
JAGX vs IRWD vs PTGX vs PRGO vs MCK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jaguar Health, Inc. (JAGX) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Ironwood Pharmaceut… (IRWD) | 100 | 43.4 | -56.6% |
| Protagonist Therape… (PTGX) | 100 | 601.1 | +501.1% |
| Perrigo Company plc (PRGO) | 100 | 21.4 | -78.6% |
| McKesson Corporation (MCK) | 100 | 464.2 | +364.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: JAGX vs IRWD vs PTGX vs PRGO vs MCK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
JAGX lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
IRWD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Lower P/E (3.1x vs 16.7x)
- 41.8% margin vs PTGX's -6.5%
- +426.5% vs JAGX's -99.2%
- 38.5% ROA vs JAGX's -114.3%, ROIC 54.0% vs -116.8%
PTGX is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 7.4% 10Y total return vs MCK's 348.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.25, Low D/E 1.7%, current ratio 12.71x
PRGO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for defensive.
- Beta 1.18, yield 9.8%, current ratio 2.76x
- 9.8% yield, 10-year raise streak, vs MCK's 0.4%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
MCK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 17 yrs, beta 0.04, yield 0.4%
- Rev growth 16.2%, EPS growth 14.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.8%
- 16.2% revenue growth vs PTGX's -89.4%
- Beta 0.04 vs JAGX's 2.72
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 16.2% revenue growth vs PTGX's -89.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (3.1x vs 16.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 41.8% margin vs PTGX's -6.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.04 vs JAGX's 2.72 | |
| Dividends | 9.8% yield, 10-year raise streak, vs MCK's 0.4%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +426.5% vs JAGX's -99.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 38.5% ROA vs JAGX's -114.3%, ROIC 54.0% vs -116.8% |
JAGX vs IRWD vs PTGX vs PRGO vs MCK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
JAGX vs IRWD vs PTGX vs PRGO vs MCK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IRWD leads in 1 of 6 categories
MCK leads 1 • PTGX leads 1 • JAGX leads 0 • PRGO leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IRWD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MCK is the larger business by revenue, generating $403.4B annually — 35047.3x JAGX's $12M. IRWD is the more profitable business, keeping 41.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PTGX's -6.5%. On growth, IRWD holds the edge at +158.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $12M | $362M | $18M | $4.2B | $403.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$54M | $201M | -$141M | $58M | $6.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$54M | $151M | -$115M | -$1.8B | $4.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$24M | $112M | -$116M | $108M | $6.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +67.2% | +70.4% | +100.0% | +34.2% | +3.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -4.0% | +55.3% | -8.1% | -4.1% | +1.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.7% | +41.8% | -6.5% | -43.5% | +1.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.1% | +31.0% | -6.6% | +2.6% | +1.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.8% | +158.9% | -100.0% | -7.2% | +6.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +90.1% | +2.0% | +126.3% | -56.4% | +37.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — JAGX and PRGO each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 27.8x trailing earnings, IRWD trades at a 5% valuation discount to MCK's 29.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PRGO's 7.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MCK's 18.7x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $198,587 | $680M | $6.4B | $1.6B | $92.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $43M | $1.1B | $6.2B | $5.1B | $93.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.00x | 27.80x | -48.22x | -1.14x | 29.25x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 3.09x | 25.80x | 5.53x | 16.66x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 0.75x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 8.81x | — | 7.42x | 18.74x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.02x | 2.30x | 138.15x | 0.38x | 0.26x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | — | 10.22x | 0.55x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.03x | 5.35x | 113.36x | 11.12x | 17.63x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MCK leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MCK delivers a 3.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $-51 for PRGO. PTGX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PRGO's 1.35x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IRWD scores 6/9 vs JAGX's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | — | -17.8% | -50.7% | +3.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -114.3% | +38.5% | -16.5% | -19.8% | +5.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -116.8% | +54.0% | -21.8% | +3.7% | +5.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.9% | +50.9% | -23.9% | +4.3% | +30.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — | 0.02x | 1.35x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $43M | $382M | -$118M | $3.4B | $1.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $968,000 | $215M | $128M | $532M | $5.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $44M | $598M | $10M | $4.0B | $7.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -565.60x | 8.43x | — | -7.20x | 33.79x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PTGX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MCK five years ago would be worth $38,689 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for JAGX. Over the past 12 months, IRWD leads with a +426.5% total return vs JAGX's -99.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PTGX at 58.3% vs JAGX's -93.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -91.5% | -2.3% | +13.4% | -13.5% | -8.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -99.2% | +426.5% | +129.4% | -51.2% | +4.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -60.3% | +296.5% | -58.1% | +106.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -62.0% | +238.8% | -60.1% | +286.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -59.2% | +744.9% | -77.7% | +348.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -93.8% | -26.5% | +58.3% | -25.2% | +27.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PTGX and MCK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MCK is the less volatile stock with a 0.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JAGX's 2.72 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PTGX currently trades 91.7% from its 52-week high vs JAGX's 0.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.71x | 2.62x | 0.23x | 1.21x | -0.02x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $395.85 | $5.78 | $107.84 | $28.44 | $999.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.71 | $0.53 | $41.29 | $9.23 | $637.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.8% | +72.1% | +91.7% | +41.2% | +75.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 16.7 | 68.4 | 56.4 | 60.9 | 16.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 42K | 2.5M | 752K | 3.4M | 757K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — PRGO and MCK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: IRWD as "Hold", PTGX as "Buy", PRGO as "Hold", MCK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 208.9% upside for PRGO (target: $36) vs 15.1% for IRWD (target: $5). For income investors, PRGO offers the higher dividend yield at 9.81% vs MCK's 0.36%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $4.80 | $115.40 | $36.20 | $994.86 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 30 | 26 | 36 | 31 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +9.8% | +0.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 10 | 17 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $1.15 | $2.69 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.4% |
IRWD leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). MCK leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
JAGX vs IRWD vs PTGX vs PRGO vs MCK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is JAGX or IRWD or PTGX or PRGO or MCK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, McKesson Corporation (MCK) is the stronger pick with 16.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -89. 4% for Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc. (PTGX). Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (IRWD) offers the better valuation at 27. 8x trailing P/E (3. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc. (PTGX) a "Buy" — based on 26 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — JAGX or IRWD or PTGX or PRGO or MCK?
On trailing P/E, Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(IRWD) is the cheapest at 27. 8x versus McKesson Corporation at 29. 2x. On forward P/E, Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is actually cheaper at 3. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — JAGX or IRWD or PTGX or PRGO or MCK?
Over the past 5 years, McKesson Corporation (MCK) delivered a total return of +286.
9%, compared to -100. 0% for Jaguar Health, Inc. (JAGX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PTGX returned +749. 2% versus JAGX's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — JAGX or IRWD or PTGX or PRGO or MCK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), McKesson Corporation (MCK) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
02β versus Jaguar Health, Inc. 's 2. 71β — meaning JAGX is approximately -16599% more volatile than MCK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc. (PTGX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 135% for Perrigo Company plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — JAGX or IRWD or PTGX or PRGO or MCK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), McKesson Corporation (MCK) is pulling ahead at 16.
2% versus -89. 4% for Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc. (PTGX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Jaguar Health, Inc. grew EPS 82. 4% year-over-year, compared to -723. 2% for Perrigo Company plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, PTGX leads at 20. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — JAGX or IRWD or PTGX or PRGO or MCK?
Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(IRWD) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 1% net margin versus -465. 4% for Jaguar Health, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IRWD leads at 40. 1% versus -398. 8% for JAGX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IRWD leads at 99. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is JAGX or IRWD or PTGX or PRGO or MCK more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(IRWD) trades at 3. 1x forward P/E versus 25. 8x for Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc. — 22. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRGO: 208. 9% to $36. 20.
08Which pays a better dividend — JAGX or IRWD or PTGX or PRGO or MCK?
In this comparison, PRGO (9.
8% yield), MCK (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. JAGX, IRWD, PTGX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is JAGX or IRWD or PTGX or PRGO or MCK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTGX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 23), +749. 2% 10Y return). Jaguar Health, Inc. (JAGX) carries a higher beta of 2. 71 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PTGX: +749. 2%, JAGX: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between JAGX and IRWD and PTGX and PRGO and MCK?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: JAGX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IRWD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PTGX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRGO is a small-cap income-oriented stock; MCK is a mid-cap high-growth stock. PRGO pays a dividend while JAGX, IRWD, PTGX, MCK do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.