JEM
707 Cayman Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares
Apparel - Retail
Market Cap$26M
5Y Perf.-98.7%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
JEM vs BABA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
Specialty Retail
Market Cap$341.64B
5Y Perf.+24.8%
JEM vs BABA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | JEM | BABA |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Apparel - Retail | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $26M | $341.64B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $88M | $1.01T |
| Net Income (TTM) | $7M | $123.35B |
| Gross Margin | 29.1% | 41.2% |
| Operating Margin | 10.7% | 10.9% |
| Forward P/E | 32.0x | 4.1x |
| Total Debt | $7M | $248.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $13M | $181.73B |
JEM vs BABA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
JEM
BABA
| Stock | Jun 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 707 Cayman Holdings… (JEM) | 100 | 1.3 | -98.7% |
| Alibaba Group Holdi… (BABA) | 100 | 124.8 | +24.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: JEM vs BABA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: BABA leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. 707 Cayman Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and operational efficiency and capital deployment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
JEM
707 Cayman Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares
The Defensive Pick
JEM is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.90, Low D/E 63.9%, current ratio 1.32x
- Beta 0.90 vs BABA's 1.21
- 21.3% ROA vs BABA's 6.7%, ROIC 293.4% vs 9.6%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
The Income Pick
BABA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.21, yield 1.3%
- Rev growth 5.9%, EPS growth 70.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.3%
- 84.5% 10Y total return vs JEM's -86.0%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | BABA | 5.9% revenue growth vs JEM's 4.4% |
| Value | BABA | Lower P/E (4.1x vs 32.0x) |
| Quality / Margins | BABA | 12.2% margin vs JEM's 8.5% |
| Stability / Safety | JEM | Beta 0.90 vs BABA's 1.21 |
| Dividends | BABA | 1.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs JEM's 1.1% |
| Momentum (1Y) | BABA | +12.4% vs JEM's -69.1% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | JEM | 21.3% ROA vs BABA's 6.7%, ROIC 293.4% vs 9.6% |
JEM vs BABA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
JEM vs BABA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLBABALAGGINGJEM
JEM707 Cayman Holdings L…
1leads
BABAAlibaba Group Holding…
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs JEMMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
BABA3/4
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
BABA4/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
JEM7/8
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
BABA6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
BABA2/2
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BABA leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BABA is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.01T annually — 11542.7x JEM's $88M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 12.2% (BABA) to 8.5% (JEM).
| Metric | JEM707 Cayman Holdin… | BABAAlibaba Group Hol… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $88M | $1.01T |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $114.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $123.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $2.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +29.1% | +41.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +10.7% | +10.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +8.5% | +12.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.3% | +0.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +4.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -52.0% |
BABA leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
BABA leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 18.0x trailing earnings, BABA trades at a 44% valuation discount to JEM's 32.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BABA's 13.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than JEM's 15.1x.
| Metric | JEM707 Cayman Holdin… | BABAAlibaba Group Hol… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $26M | $341.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $25M | $351.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 32.03x | 17.99x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 4.14x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.09x | 13.62x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.30x | 2.34x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 22.97x | 2.13x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 70.00x | 29.80x |
BABA leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JEM leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JEM delivers a 111.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $112 in annual profit, vs $11 for BABA. BABA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.23x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JEM's 0.64x.
| Metric | JEM707 Cayman Holdin… | BABAAlibaba Group Hol… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +111.7% | +11.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +21.3% | +6.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.9% | +9.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +80.8% | +10.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.64x | 0.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$6M | $66.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $13M | $181.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $7M | $248.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 20.63x | 15.74x |
JEM leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BABA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BABA five years ago would be worth $6,453 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,089 for JEM. Over the past 12 months, BABA leads with a +12.4% total return vs JEM's -69.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BABA at 20.6% vs JEM's -32.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | JEM707 Cayman Holdin… | BABAAlibaba Group Hol… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -63.2% | -9.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -69.1% | +12.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -69.1% | +75.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -69.1% | -35.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.0% | +84.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -32.4% | +20.6% |
BABA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — JEM and BABA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JEM is the less volatile stock with a 0.90 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BABA's 1.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BABA currently trades 73.4% from its 52-week high vs JEM's 0.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | JEM707 Cayman Holdin… | BABAAlibaba Group Hol… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.90x | 1.21x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $158.00 | $192.67 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.17 | $103.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.9% | +73.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.6 | 49.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 12.1M | 10.3M |
Evenly matched — JEM and BABA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
BABA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, BABA offers the higher dividend yield at 1.26% vs JEM's 1.13%.
| Metric | JEM707 Cayman Holdin… | BABAAlibaba Group Hol… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $194.23 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 59 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.1% | +1.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.12 | $12.14 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.8% |
BABA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
BABA leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). JEM leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
Best OverallAlibaba Group Holding Limit… (BABA)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
JEM vs BABA: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is JEM or BABA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) is the stronger pick with 5.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 4% for 707 Cayman Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (JEM). Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) offers the better valuation at 18. 0x trailing P/E (4. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) a "Buy" — based on 59 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — JEM or BABA?
On trailing P/E, Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) is the cheapest at 18.
0x versus 707 Cayman Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares at 32. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — JEM or BABA?
Over the past 5 years, Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) delivered a total return of -35.
5%, compared to -69. 1% for 707 Cayman Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (JEM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BABA returned +84. 5% versus JEM's -86. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — JEM or BABA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), 707 Cayman Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (JEM) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
90β versus Alibaba Group Holding Limited's 1. 21β — meaning BABA is approximately 34% more volatile than JEM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 23% versus 64% for 707 Cayman Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — JEM or BABA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) is pulling ahead at 5.
9% versus 4. 4% for 707 Cayman Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (JEM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Alibaba Group Holding Limited grew EPS 70. 9% year-over-year, compared to 13. 3% for 707 Cayman Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — JEM or BABA?
Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) is the more profitable company, earning 13.
1% net margin versus 8. 5% for 707 Cayman Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares — meaning it keeps 13. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BABA leads at 14. 1% versus 10. 7% for JEM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BABA leads at 40. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — JEM or BABA?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) offers the highest yield at 1. 3%, versus 1. 1% for 707 Cayman Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (JEM).
08Is JEM or BABA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, 707 Cayman Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (JEM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
90), 1. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (JEM: -86. 0%, BABA: +84. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between JEM and BABA?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: JEM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BABA is a large-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(JEM: 4.4% · BABA: 4.8%)Net Margin>
%
(JEM: 8.5% · BABA: 12.2%)P/E Ratio<
x
(JEM: 32.0x · BABA: 18.0x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.