Packaged Foods
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
JJSF vs MDLZ
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Food Confectioners
JJSF vs MDLZ — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Food Confectioners |
| Market Cap | $1.50B | $79.42B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.55B | $39.30B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $58M | $2.61B |
| Gross Margin | 30.5% | 28.8% |
| Operating Margin | 5.1% | 9.4% |
| Forward P/E | 18.2x | 20.2x |
| Total Debt | $164M | $22.40B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $106M | $2.13B |
JJSF vs MDLZ — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| J&J Snack Foods Cor… (JJSF) | 100 | 61.2 | -38.8% |
| Mondelez Internatio… (MDLZ) | 100 | 118.7 | +18.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: JJSF vs MDLZ
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
JJSF is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 21 yrs, beta 0.15, yield 4.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.15, Low D/E 16.9%, current ratio 2.72x
- Beta 0.15, yield 4.0%, current ratio 2.72x
MDLZ carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 5.8%, EPS growth -44.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.0%
- 71.0% 10Y total return vs JJSF's -2.3%
- 5.8% revenue growth vs JJSF's 0.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.8% revenue growth vs JJSF's 0.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (18.2x vs 20.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.6% margin vs JJSF's 3.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.06 vs JJSF's 0.15 | |
| Dividends | 4.0% yield, 21-year raise streak, vs MDLZ's 3.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -5.4% vs JJSF's -29.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.3% ROA vs MDLZ's 3.7%, ROIC 6.1% vs 6.0% |
JJSF vs MDLZ — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
JJSF vs MDLZ — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MDLZ leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MDLZ is the larger business by revenue, generating $39.3B annually — 25.3x JJSF's $1.6B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 6.6% (MDLZ) to 3.7% (JJSF). On growth, MDLZ holds the edge at +8.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.6B | $39.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $136M | $4.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $58M | $2.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $90M | $2.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.5% | +28.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.1% | +9.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.7% | +6.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.8% | +6.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.2% | +8.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -64.0% | +38.7% |
Valuation Metrics
JJSF leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 23.4x trailing earnings, JJSF trades at a 28% valuation discount to MDLZ's 32.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, JJSF's 9.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MDLZ's 20.0x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.5B | $79.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.6B | $99.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 23.41x | 32.74x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 18.21x | 20.24x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.82x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.85x | 20.03x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.94x | 2.06x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.59x | 3.10x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 18.18x | 24.55x |
Profitability & Efficiency
JJSF leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MDLZ delivers a 10.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $6 for JJSF. JJSF carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MDLZ's 0.87x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MDLZ scores 5/9 vs JJSF's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.2% | +10.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.3% | +3.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.1% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.0% | +7.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.17x | 0.87x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $58M | $20.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $106M | $2.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $164M | $22.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 72.88x | 10.01x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MDLZ leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MDLZ five years ago would be worth $11,375 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,595 for JJSF. Over the past 12 months, MDLZ leads with a -5.4% total return vs JJSF's -29.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MDLZ at -4.8% vs JJSF's -18.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -12.2% | +16.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -29.5% | -5.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -46.3% | -13.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -44.1% | +13.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -2.3% | +71.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -18.7% | -4.8% |
Risk & Volatility
MDLZ leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MDLZ is the less volatile stock with a 0.06 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JJSF's 0.15 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MDLZ currently trades 87.0% from its 52-week high vs JJSF's 60.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.15x | 0.06x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $129.24 | $71.15 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $73.75 | $51.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +60.9% | +87.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.7 | 66.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 252K | 9.0M |
Analyst Outlook
JJSF leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates JJSF as "Buy" and MDLZ as "Buy". For income investors, JJSF offers the higher dividend yield at 3.95% vs MDLZ's 3.10%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $67.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 41 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.0% | +3.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 21 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.11 | $1.92 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.5% | +3.0% |
MDLZ leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). JJSF leads in 3 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency).
JJSF vs MDLZ: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is JJSF or MDLZ a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Mondelez International, Inc.
(MDLZ) is the stronger pick with 5. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 5% for J&J Snack Foods Corp. (JJSF). J&J Snack Foods Corp. (JJSF) offers the better valuation at 23. 4x trailing P/E (18. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate J&J Snack Foods Corp. (JJSF) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — JJSF or MDLZ?
On trailing P/E, J&J Snack Foods Corp.
(JJSF) is the cheapest at 23. 4x versus Mondelez International, Inc. at 32. 7x. On forward P/E, J&J Snack Foods Corp. is actually cheaper at 18. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — JJSF or MDLZ?
Over the past 5 years, Mondelez International, Inc.
(MDLZ) delivered a total return of +13. 7%, compared to -44. 1% for J&J Snack Foods Corp. (JJSF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MDLZ returned +71. 0% versus JJSF's -2. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — JJSF or MDLZ?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Mondelez International, Inc.
(MDLZ) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 06β versus J&J Snack Foods Corp. 's 0. 15β — meaning JJSF is approximately 160% more volatile than MDLZ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, J&J Snack Foods Corp. (JJSF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 87% for Mondelez International, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — JJSF or MDLZ?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Mondelez International, Inc.
(MDLZ) is pulling ahead at 5. 8% versus 0. 5% for J&J Snack Foods Corp. (JJSF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: J&J Snack Foods Corp. grew EPS -24. 5% year-over-year, compared to -44. 7% for Mondelez International, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MDLZ leads at 7. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — JJSF or MDLZ?
Mondelez International, Inc.
(MDLZ) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 4% net margin versus 4. 1% for J&J Snack Foods Corp. — meaning it keeps 6. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MDLZ leads at 9. 4% versus 5. 3% for JJSF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JJSF leads at 29. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is JJSF or MDLZ more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, J&J Snack Foods Corp.
(JJSF) trades at 18. 2x forward P/E versus 20. 2x for Mondelez International, Inc. — 2. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — JJSF or MDLZ?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
J&J Snack Foods Corp. (JJSF) offers the highest yield at 4. 0%, versus 3. 1% for Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ).
09Is JJSF or MDLZ better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Mondelez International, Inc.
(MDLZ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 06), 3. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MDLZ: +71. 0%, JJSF: -2. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between JJSF and MDLZ?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.