Packaged Foods
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
JJSF vs MDLZ vs HSY vs RMCF
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Food Confectioners
Food Confectioners
Food Confectioners
JJSF vs MDLZ vs HSY vs RMCF — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Food Confectioners | Food Confectioners | Food Confectioners |
| Market Cap | $1.44B | $78.70B | $37.89B | $20M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.55B | $39.30B | $11.99B | $30M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $58M | $2.61B | $1.09B | $-4M |
| Gross Margin | 30.5% | 28.8% | 34.8% | 21.0% |
| Operating Margin | 5.4% | 9.4% | 14.1% | -10.9% |
| Forward P/E | 17.5x | 20.1x | 22.2x | — |
| Total Debt | $164M | $22.40B | $5.40B | $7M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $106M | $2.13B | $926M | $720K |
JJSF vs MDLZ vs HSY vs RMCF — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| J&J Snack Foods Cor… (JJSF) | 100 | 58.9 | -41.1% |
| Mondelez Internatio… (MDLZ) | 100 | 117.6 | +17.6% |
| The Hershey Company (HSY) | 100 | 137.8 | +37.8% |
| Rocky Mountain Choc… (RMCF) | 100 | 59.2 | -40.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: JJSF vs MDLZ vs HSY vs RMCF
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
JJSF has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 21 yrs, beta 0.15, yield 4.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.15, Low D/E 16.9%, current ratio 2.72x
- Beta 0.15, yield 4.1%, current ratio 2.72x
- Better valuation composite
MDLZ is the clearest fit if your priority is stability.
- Beta 0.06 vs RMCF's 1.10, lower leverage
HSY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 142.6% 10Y total return vs MDLZ's 68.4%
- 9.1% margin vs RMCF's -13.6%
- 8.0% ROA vs RMCF's -19.5%, ROIC 11.5% vs -35.7%
RMCF is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 5.8%, EPS growth -30.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 0.1%
- 5.8% revenue growth vs JJSF's 0.5%
- +103.2% vs JJSF's -30.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.8% revenue growth vs JJSF's 0.5% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.1% margin vs RMCF's -13.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.06 vs RMCF's 1.10, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.1% yield, 21-year raise streak, vs HSY's 2.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +103.2% vs JJSF's -30.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.0% ROA vs RMCF's -19.5%, ROIC 11.5% vs -35.7% |
JJSF vs MDLZ vs HSY vs RMCF — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
JJSF vs MDLZ vs HSY vs RMCF — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HSY leads in 2 of 6 categories
JJSF leads 1 • MDLZ leads 0 • RMCF leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HSY leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MDLZ is the larger business by revenue, generating $39.3B annually — 1326.1x RMCF's $30M. HSY is the more profitable business, keeping 9.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RMCF's -13.6%. On growth, HSY holds the edge at +10.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.6B | $39.3B | $12.0B | $30M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $160M | $4.9B | $2.0B | -$2M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $58M | $2.6B | $1.1B | -$4M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $90M | $2.6B | $2.2B | -$2M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.5% | +28.8% | +34.8% | +21.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.4% | +9.4% | +14.1% | -10.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.7% | +6.6% | +9.1% | -13.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.8% | +6.6% | +18.1% | -7.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.2% | +8.2% | +10.6% | -4.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -64.6% | +38.7% | +93.6% | +81.8% |
Valuation Metrics
JJSF leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 22.5x trailing earnings, JJSF trades at a 48% valuation discount to HSY's 43.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, JJSF's 9.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HSY's 29.2x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.4B | $78.7B | $37.9B | $20M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.5B | $99.0B | $42.4B | $26M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 22.53x | 32.44x | 43.07x | -2.95x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.53x | 20.06x | 22.23x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.79x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.50x | 19.88x | 29.24x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.91x | 2.04x | 3.24x | 0.67x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.53x | 3.07x | 8.19x | 2.58x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 17.50x | 24.33x | 21.66x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
HSY leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HSY delivers a 23.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $-67 for RMCF. JJSF carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HSY's 1.17x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HSY scores 6/9 vs RMCF's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.2% | +10.0% | +23.7% | -67.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.3% | +3.7% | +8.0% | -19.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.1% | +6.0% | +11.5% | -35.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.0% | +7.3% | +14.4% | -44.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.17x | 0.87x | 1.17x | 1.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $58M | $20.3B | $4.5B | $6M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $106M | $2.1B | $926M | $720,000 |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $164M | $22.4B | $5.4B | $7M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 50.00x | 10.01x | 7.99x | -3.92x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — MDLZ and HSY and RMCF each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HSY five years ago would be worth $12,480 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,233 for RMCF. Over the past 12 months, RMCF leads with a +103.2% total return vs JJSF's -30.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MDLZ at -5.1% vs RMCF's -22.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -15.5% | +15.2% | +3.3% | +31.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -30.6% | -5.8% | +14.1% | +103.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -48.1% | -14.5% | -26.2% | -53.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -46.4% | +12.6% | +24.8% | -57.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -5.2% | +68.4% | +142.6% | -56.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -19.6% | -5.1% | -9.6% | -22.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MDLZ and HSY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HSY is the less volatile stock with a -0.03 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RMCF's 1.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MDLZ currently trades 86.2% from its 52-week high vs JJSF's 58.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.15x | 0.06x | -0.03x | 1.10x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $129.24 | $71.15 | $239.48 | $2.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $73.75 | $51.20 | $150.04 | $1.14 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +58.6% | +86.2% | +78.1% | +84.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.2 | 68.7 | 37.3 | 65.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 254K | 9.0M | 1.7M | 32K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — JJSF and HSY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: JJSF as "Buy", MDLZ as "Buy", HSY as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 21.1% upside for HSY (target: $226) vs 9.3% for MDLZ (target: $67). For income investors, JJSF offers the higher dividend yield at 4.10% vs HSY's 2.86%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $67.00 | $226.29 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 41 | 35 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.1% | +3.1% | +2.9% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 21 | 12 | 34 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.11 | $1.92 | $5.34 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.6% | +3.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
HSY leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). JJSF leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
JJSF vs MDLZ vs HSY vs RMCF: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is JJSF or MDLZ or HSY or RMCF a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory, Inc.
(RMCF) is the stronger pick with 5. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 5% for J&J Snack Foods Corp. (JJSF). J&J Snack Foods Corp. (JJSF) offers the better valuation at 22. 5x trailing P/E (17. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate J&J Snack Foods Corp. (JJSF) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — JJSF or MDLZ or HSY or RMCF?
On trailing P/E, J&J Snack Foods Corp.
(JJSF) is the cheapest at 22. 5x versus The Hershey Company at 43. 1x. On forward P/E, J&J Snack Foods Corp. is actually cheaper at 17. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — JJSF or MDLZ or HSY or RMCF?
Over the past 5 years, The Hershey Company (HSY) delivered a total return of +24.
8%, compared to -57. 7% for Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory, Inc. (RMCF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HSY returned +142. 6% versus RMCF's -56. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — JJSF or MDLZ or HSY or RMCF?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Hershey Company (HSY) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
03β versus Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory, Inc. 's 1. 10β — meaning RMCF is approximately -4466% more volatile than HSY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, J&J Snack Foods Corp. (JJSF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 117% for The Hershey Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — JJSF or MDLZ or HSY or RMCF?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory, Inc.
(RMCF) is pulling ahead at 5. 8% versus 0. 5% for J&J Snack Foods Corp. (JJSF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: J&J Snack Foods Corp. grew EPS -24. 5% year-over-year, compared to -60. 3% for The Hershey Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, MDLZ leads at 7. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — JJSF or MDLZ or HSY or RMCF?
The Hershey Company (HSY) is the more profitable company, earning 7.
6% net margin versus -20. 7% for Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory, Inc. — meaning it keeps 7. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HSY leads at 12. 1% versus -20. 1% for RMCF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HSY leads at 33. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is JJSF or MDLZ or HSY or RMCF more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, J&J Snack Foods Corp.
(JJSF) trades at 17. 5x forward P/E versus 22. 2x for The Hershey Company — 4. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HSY: 21. 1% to $226. 29.
08Which pays a better dividend — JJSF or MDLZ or HSY or RMCF?
In this comparison, JJSF (4.
1% yield), MDLZ (3. 1% yield), HSY (2. 9% yield) pay a dividend. RMCF does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is JJSF or MDLZ or HSY or RMCF better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Hershey Company (HSY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
03), 2. 9% yield, +142. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HSY: +142. 6%, RMCF: -56. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between JJSF and MDLZ and HSY and RMCF?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: JJSF is a small-cap income-oriented stock; MDLZ is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; HSY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; RMCF is a small-cap quality compounder stock. JJSF, MDLZ, HSY pay a dividend while RMCF does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.