Airlines, Airports & Air Services
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
JOBY vs CAT vs KO vs JPM vs BAC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Agricultural - Machinery
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Banks - Diversified
Banks - Diversified
JOBY vs CAT vs KO vs JPM vs BAC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Airlines, Airports & Air Services | Agricultural - Machinery | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Banks - Diversified | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $9.83B | $458.69B | $341.71B | $908.57B | $424.14B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $78M | $70.75B | $49.28B | $280.33B | $191.57B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-957M | $9.42B | $13.70B | $57.05B | $30.51B |
| Gross Margin | 11.2% | 32.5% | 61.7% | 60.0% | 56.1% |
| Operating Margin | -10.2% | 16.6% | 29.3% | 25.9% | 19.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 40.0x | 24.3x | 14.6x | 12.6x |
| Total Debt | $61M | $43.33B | $45.49B | $942.38B | $365.90B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $241M | $9.98B | $10.27B | $343.34B | $231.84B |
JOBY vs CAT vs KO vs JPM vs BAC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Joby Aviation, Inc. (JOBY) | 100 | 88.9 | -11.1% |
| Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) | 100 | 567.9 | +467.9% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 153.9 | +53.9% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 275.9 | +175.9% |
| Bank of America Cor… (BAC) | 100 | 199.6 | +99.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: JOBY vs CAT vs KO vs JPM vs BAC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
JOBY ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.
- 391.8% revenue growth vs BAC's -0.5%
CAT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 4.3%, EPS growth -14.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.4%
- 12.5% 10Y total return vs JPM's 481.2%
- +175.7% vs JOBY's +13.1%
KO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 56 yrs, beta -0.23, yield 2.6%
- 27.8% margin vs JOBY's -12.3%
- 2.6% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
- 13.1% ROA vs JOBY's -52.1%, ROIC 15.8% vs -54.7%
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.
- NIM 2.2% vs BAC's 1.8%
BAC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.83, current ratio 0.42x
- PEG 0.82 vs KO's 2.17
- Beta 0.83, yield 2.3%, current ratio 0.42x
- Lower P/E (12.6x vs 24.3x), PEG 0.82 vs 2.17
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 391.8% revenue growth vs BAC's -0.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.6x vs 24.3x), PEG 0.82 vs 2.17 | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs JOBY's -12.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.83 vs JOBY's 3.24 | |
| Dividends | 2.6% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +175.7% vs JOBY's +13.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs JOBY's -52.1%, ROIC 15.8% vs -54.7% |
JOBY vs CAT vs KO vs JPM vs BAC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
JOBY vs CAT vs KO vs JPM vs BAC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KO leads in 2 of 6 categories
BAC leads 1 • CAT leads 1 • JOBY leads 0 • JPM leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 3609.2x JOBY's $78M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to JOBY's -12.3%. On growth, CAT holds the edge at +22.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $78M | $70.8B | $49.3B | $280.3B | $191.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$759M | $14.0B | $15.5B | $81.4B | $40.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$957M | $9.4B | $13.7B | $57.0B | $30.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$661M | $11.4B | $12.6B | $100.9B | $12.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +11.2% | +32.5% | +61.7% | +60.0% | +56.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -10.2% | +16.6% | +29.3% | +25.9% | +19.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -12.3% | +13.3% | +27.8% | +20.4% | +15.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -8.5% | +16.2% | +25.5% | +36.0% | +6.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +22.2% | +12.1% | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -9.1% | +30.2% | +18.2% | +16.0% | +18.3% |
Valuation Metrics
BAC leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.7x trailing earnings, BAC trades at a 72% valuation discount to CAT's 52.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.92x vs KO's 2.34x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $9.8B | $458.7B | $341.7B | $908.6B | $424.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $9.7B | $492.0B | $376.9B | $1.51T | $558.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -8.85x | 52.35x | 26.12x | 16.22x | 14.71x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 39.97x | 24.27x | 14.60x | 12.60x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.86x | 2.34x | 0.92x | 0.96x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 36.52x | 25.45x | 18.52x | 13.95x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 184.03x | 6.79x | 7.13x | 3.25x | 2.21x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.86x | 21.69x | 9.99x | 2.51x | 1.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 44.65x | 64.52x | 9.01x | 33.63x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — JOBY and CAT and KO each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CAT delivers a 47.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $48 in annual profit, vs $-74 for JOBY. JOBY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs JOBY's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -74.2% | +47.5% | +41.1% | +15.9% | +10.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -52.1% | +10.0% | +13.1% | +1.3% | +0.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -54.7% | +15.9% | +15.8% | +4.5% | +3.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -49.8% | +19.1% | +17.3% | +8.9% | +4.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | 2.03x | 1.33x | 2.60x | 1.21x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$180M | $33.4B | $35.2B | $599.0B | $134.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $241M | $10.0B | $10.3B | $343.3B | $231.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $61M | $43.3B | $45.5B | $942.4B | $365.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 9.22x | 10.70x | 0.74x | 0.48x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CAT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CAT five years ago would be worth $48,451 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,040 for JOBY. Over the past 12 months, CAT leads with a +175.7% total return vs JOBY's +13.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CAT at 60.8% vs JOBY's 11.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -30.4% | +65.2% | +16.4% | +0.8% | +1.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +13.1% | +175.7% | +17.7% | +20.9% | +27.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +36.8% | +315.8% | +39.3% | +138.8% | +105.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +0.4% | +384.5% | +65.3% | +135.5% | +57.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -4.8% | +1247.4% | +115.0% | +481.2% | +371.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +11.0% | +60.8% | +11.7% | +33.7% | +27.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CAT and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JOBY's 3.24 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CAT currently trades 99.1% from its 52-week high vs JOBY's 47.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.24x | 1.64x | -0.23x | 0.87x | 0.83x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.95 | $994.49 | $84.04 | $338.09 | $57.98 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.75 | $356.96 | $65.35 | $269.72 | $44.21 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +47.7% | +99.1% | +94.5% | +96.2% | +96.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.4 | 61.4 | 49.2 | 72.1 | 70.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 28.7M | 2.5M | 13.6M | 7.4M | 32.4M |
Analyst Outlook
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: JOBY as "Hold", CAT as "Buy", KO as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", BAC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 65.0% upside for JOBY (target: $17) vs -10.5% for CAT (target: $882). For income investors, KO offers the higher dividend yield at 2.56% vs CAT's 0.59%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $16.50 | $882.20 | $86.13 | $339.75 | $61.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 53 | 48 | 61 | 54 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.6% | +2.6% | +1.8% | +2.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 32 | 56 | 15 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $5.86 | $2.04 | $5.95 | $1.27 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.1% | +0.2% | +3.8% | +5.1% |
KO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). BAC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
JOBY vs CAT vs KO vs JPM vs BAC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is JOBY or CAT or KO or JPM or BAC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Joby Aviation, Inc.
(JOBY) is the stronger pick with 391. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 5% for Bank of America Corporation (BAC). Bank of America Corporation (BAC) offers the better valuation at 14. 7x trailing P/E (12. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) a "Buy" — based on 53 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — JOBY or CAT or KO or JPM or BAC?
On trailing P/E, Bank of America Corporation (BAC) is the cheapest at 14.
7x versus Caterpillar Inc. at 52. 4x. On forward P/E, Bank of America Corporation is actually cheaper at 12. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Bank of America Corporation wins at 0. 82x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 17x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — JOBY or CAT or KO or JPM or BAC?
Over the past 5 years, Caterpillar Inc.
(CAT) delivered a total return of +384. 5%, compared to +0. 4% for Joby Aviation, Inc. (JOBY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CAT returned +1247% versus JOBY's -4. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — JOBY or CAT or KO or JPM or BAC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
23β versus Joby Aviation, Inc. 's 3. 24β — meaning JOBY is approximately -1488% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Joby Aviation, Inc. (JOBY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — JOBY or CAT or KO or JPM or BAC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Joby Aviation, Inc.
(JOBY) is pulling ahead at 391. 8% versus -0. 5% for Bank of America Corporation (BAC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Coca-Cola Company grew EPS 23. 6% year-over-year, compared to -29. 9% for Joby Aviation, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CAT leads at 4. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — JOBY or CAT or KO or JPM or BAC?
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus -1740. 5% for Joby Aviation, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus -1346. 9% for JOBY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KO leads at 61. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is JOBY or CAT or KO or JPM or BAC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Bank of America Corporation (BAC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 82x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 17x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Bank of America Corporation (BAC) trades at 12. 6x forward P/E versus 40. 0x for Caterpillar Inc. — 27. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for JOBY: 65. 0% to $16. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — JOBY or CAT or KO or JPM or BAC?
In this comparison, KO (2.
6% yield), BAC (2. 3% yield), JPM (1. 8% yield), CAT (0. 6% yield) pay a dividend. JOBY does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is JOBY or CAT or KO or JPM or BAC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
23), 2. 6% yield, +115. 0% 10Y return). Joby Aviation, Inc. (JOBY) carries a higher beta of 3. 24 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +115. 0%, JOBY: -4. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between JOBY and CAT and KO and JPM and BAC?
These companies operate in different sectors (JOBY (Industrials) and CAT (Industrials) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and JPM (Financial Services) and BAC (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: JOBY is a small-cap high-growth stock; CAT is a large-cap quality compounder stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; BAC is a large-cap deep-value stock. CAT, KO, JPM, BAC pay a dividend while JOBY does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.