Real Estate - Diversified
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
JOE vs FOR vs DHI vs LEN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Real Estate - Development
Residential Construction
Residential Construction
JOE vs FOR vs DHI vs LEN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Diversified | Real Estate - Development | Residential Construction | Residential Construction |
| Market Cap | $3.73B | $1.39B | $42.29B | $18.93B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $518M | $1.71B | $33.35B | $34.13B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $112M | $167M | $3.17B | $2.08B |
| Gross Margin | 92.6% | 21.3% | 22.8% | 17.6% |
| Operating Margin | 28.5% | 12.3% | 11.8% | 7.7% |
| Forward P/E | 260.2x | 9.2x | 13.7x | 14.2x |
| Total Debt | $394M | $817M | $6.03B | $6.32B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $130M | $379M | $2.99B | $3.80B |
JOE vs FOR vs DHI vs LEN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| The St. Joe Company (JOE) | 100 | 337.9 | +237.9% |
| Forestar Group Inc. (FOR) | 100 | 179.7 | +79.7% |
| D.R. Horton, Inc. (DHI) | 100 | 264.0 | +164.0% |
| Lennar Corporation (LEN) | 100 | 145.1 | +45.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: JOE vs FOR vs DHI vs LEN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
JOE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 27.5%, EPS growth 57.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.7%
- 27.5% FFO/revenue growth vs DHI's -6.9%
- 21.6% margin vs LEN's 6.1%
- Beta 0.77 vs FOR's 1.14
FOR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency is your priority.
- PEG 0.44 vs LEN's 43.27
- Lower P/E (9.2x vs 14.2x), PEG 0.44 vs 43.27
DHI is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 424.3% 10Y total return vs JOE's 301.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.85, Low D/E 24.4%, current ratio 17.39x
- Beta 0.85, yield 1.1%, current ratio 17.39x
- 8.9% ROA vs FOR's 5.3%, ROIC 12.1% vs 7.8%
LEN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.92, yield 2.3%
- 2.3% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs JOE's 0.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.5% FFO/revenue growth vs DHI's -6.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.2x vs 14.2x), PEG 0.44 vs 43.27 | |
| Quality / Margins | 21.6% margin vs LEN's 6.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.77 vs FOR's 1.14 | |
| Dividends | 2.3% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs JOE's 0.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +49.9% vs LEN's -16.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.9% ROA vs FOR's 5.3%, ROIC 12.1% vs 7.8% |
JOE vs FOR vs DHI vs LEN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
JOE vs FOR vs DHI vs LEN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
JOE leads in 2 of 6 categories
FOR leads 1 • LEN leads 1 • DHI leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JOE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LEN is the larger business by revenue, generating $34.1B annually — 65.9x JOE's $518M. JOE is the more profitable business, keeping 21.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LEN's 6.1%. On growth, FOR holds the edge at +6.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $518M | $1.7B | $33.3B | $34.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $194M | $213M | $4.0B | $2.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $112M | $167M | $3.2B | $2.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $201M | $266M | $3.5B | $28M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +92.6% | +21.3% | +22.8% | +17.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +28.5% | +12.3% | +11.8% | +7.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +21.6% | +9.8% | +9.5% | +6.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +38.8% | +15.5% | +10.5% | +0.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.1% | +6.6% | -2.3% | -6.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -20.0% | +1.6% | -13.2% | -52.5% |
Valuation Metrics
FOR leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.3x trailing earnings, FOR trades at a 75% valuation discount to JOE's 32.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FOR offers better value at 0.39x vs LEN's 43.27x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.7B | $1.4B | $42.3B | $18.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.0B | $1.8B | $45.3B | $21.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 32.52x | 8.29x | 12.62x | 10.99x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 260.20x | 9.22x | 13.71x | 14.24x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.55x | 0.39x | 1.01x | 43.27x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 20.64x | 8.59x | 10.02x | 7.43x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 7.28x | 0.83x | 1.23x | 0.55x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.83x | 0.78x | 1.83x | 1.02x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 20.01x | — | 12.88x | 671.74x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — JOE and DHI each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JOE delivers a 14.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $9 for LEN. DHI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.24x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JOE's 0.51x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), JOE scores 9/9 vs FOR's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.6% | +9.5% | +12.9% | +9.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.3% | +5.3% | +8.9% | +6.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.3% | +7.8% | +12.1% | +7.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.8% | +8.2% | +13.1% | +8.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 9 | 1 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.51x | 0.46x | 0.24x | 0.29x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $264M | $438M | $3.0B | $2.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $130M | $379M | $3.0B | $3.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $394M | $817M | $6.0B | $6.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.01x | — | 44.09x | 198.24x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JOE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in DHI five years ago would be worth $14,674 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,891 for LEN. Over the past 12 months, JOE leads with a +49.9% total return vs LEN's -16.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JOE at 16.8% vs LEN's -6.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +9.0% | +12.1% | +0.8% | -14.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +49.9% | +39.4% | +20.3% | -16.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +59.3% | +37.4% | +38.6% | -18.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +42.9% | +8.0% | +46.7% | -11.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +301.3% | +118.1% | +424.3% | +122.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +16.8% | +11.2% | +11.5% | -6.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — JOE and FOR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JOE is the less volatile stock with a 0.77 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FOR's 1.14 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FOR currently trades 88.7% from its 52-week high vs LEN's 60.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.77x | 1.14x | 0.85x | 0.92x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $73.54 | $30.74 | $184.55 | $144.24 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $42.65 | $18.50 | $114.17 | $83.03 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.5% | +88.7% | +79.1% | +60.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.2 | 52.5 | 49.6 | 48.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 257K | 134K | 2.6M | 2.9M |
Analyst Outlook
LEN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: JOE as "Hold", FOR as "Buy", DHI as "Hold", LEN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 16.4% upside for LEN (target: $102) vs 4.1% for FOR (target: $28). For income investors, LEN offers the higher dividend yield at 2.30% vs JOE's 0.90%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $28.38 | $163.86 | $102.14 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 12 | 52 | 50 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.9% | — | +1.1% | +2.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 1 | 11 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.58 | — | $1.60 | $2.02 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.1% | +0.1% | +10.1% | +9.6% |
JOE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). FOR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
JOE vs FOR vs DHI vs LEN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is JOE or FOR or DHI or LEN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The St.
Joe Company (JOE) is the stronger pick with 27. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 9% for D. R. Horton, Inc. (DHI). Forestar Group Inc. (FOR) offers the better valuation at 8. 3x trailing P/E (9. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Forestar Group Inc. (FOR) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — JOE or FOR or DHI or LEN?
On trailing P/E, Forestar Group Inc.
(FOR) is the cheapest at 8. 3x versus The St. Joe Company at 32. 5x. On forward P/E, Forestar Group Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Forestar Group Inc. wins at 0. 44x versus Lennar Corporation's 43. 27x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — JOE or FOR or DHI or LEN?
Over the past 5 years, D.
R. Horton, Inc. (DHI) delivered a total return of +46. 7%, compared to -11. 1% for Lennar Corporation (LEN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DHI returned +424. 3% versus FOR's +118. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — JOE or FOR or DHI or LEN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The St.
Joe Company (JOE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 77β versus Forestar Group Inc. 's 1. 14β — meaning FOR is approximately 47% more volatile than JOE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, D. R. Horton, Inc. (DHI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 24% versus 51% for The St. Joe Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — JOE or FOR or DHI or LEN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The St.
Joe Company (JOE) is pulling ahead at 27. 5% versus -6. 9% for D. R. Horton, Inc. (DHI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The St. Joe Company grew EPS 57. 5% year-over-year, compared to -44. 2% for Lennar Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, JOE leads at 26. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — JOE or FOR or DHI or LEN?
The St.
Joe Company (JOE) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 5% net margin versus 6. 0% for Lennar Corporation — meaning it keeps 22. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JOE leads at 28. 5% versus 8. 0% for LEN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JOE leads at 93. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is JOE or FOR or DHI or LEN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Forestar Group Inc. (FOR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 44x versus Lennar Corporation's 43. 27x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Forestar Group Inc. (FOR) trades at 9. 2x forward P/E versus 260. 2x for The St. Joe Company — 251. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LEN: 16. 4% to $102. 14.
08Which pays a better dividend — JOE or FOR or DHI or LEN?
In this comparison, LEN (2.
3% yield), DHI (1. 1% yield), JOE (0. 9% yield) pay a dividend. FOR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is JOE or FOR or DHI or LEN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, D.
R. Horton, Inc. (DHI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 85), 1. 1% yield, +424. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (DHI: +424. 3%, FOR: +118. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between JOE and FOR and DHI and LEN?
These companies operate in different sectors (JOE (Real Estate) and FOR (Real Estate) and DHI (Consumer Cyclical) and LEN (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: JOE is a small-cap high-growth stock; FOR is a small-cap deep-value stock; DHI is a mid-cap deep-value stock; LEN is a mid-cap deep-value stock. JOE, DHI, LEN pay a dividend while FOR does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.