Leisure
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
JOUT vs YETI vs CLAR vs MBUU vs HZO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Leisure
Leisure
Auto - Recreational Vehicles
Specialty Retail
JOUT vs YETI vs CLAR vs MBUU vs HZO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Leisure | Leisure | Leisure | Auto - Recreational Vehicles | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $490M | $3.82B | $119M | $547M | $749M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $652M | $1.90B | $252M | $826M | $2.24B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-15M | $159M | $-45M | $-905K | $-64M |
| Gross Margin | 37.5% | 57.0% | 32.6% | 15.0% | 32.7% |
| Operating Margin | 1.0% | 10.8% | -10.6% | 0.1% | -0.6% |
| Forward P/E | 62.4x | 17.5x | — | 19.5x | 46.5x |
| Total Debt | $49M | $228M | $12M | $25M | $1.25B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $176M | $188M | $37M | $37M | $170M |
JOUT vs YETI vs CLAR vs MBUU vs HZO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Johnson Outdoors In… (JOUT) | 100 | 51.4 | -48.6% |
| YETI Holdings, Inc. (YETI) | 100 | 118.0 | +18.0% |
| Clarus Corporation (CLAR) | 100 | 26.8 | -73.2% |
| Malibu Boats, Inc. (MBUU) | 100 | 53.7 | -46.3% |
| MarineMax, Inc. (HZO) | 100 | 151.9 | +51.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: JOUT vs YETI vs CLAR vs MBUU vs HZO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
JOUT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.87, Low D/E 11.6%, current ratio 3.91x
- Beta 0.87 vs HZO's 2.04, lower leverage
YETI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 2.1%, EPS growth -1.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.4%
- 196.6% 10Y total return vs HZO's 108.2%
- 2.1% revenue growth vs CLAR's -5.2%
- Lower P/E (17.5x vs 46.5x)
CLAR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.37, yield 3.2%
- Beta 1.37, yield 3.2%, current ratio 4.23x
- 3.2% yield, vs JOUT's 2.8%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
MBUU lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, HZO doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 2.1% revenue growth vs CLAR's -5.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (17.5x vs 46.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.4% margin vs CLAR's -17.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.87 vs HZO's 2.04, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, vs JOUT's 2.8%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +60.3% vs MBUU's -13.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.5% ROA vs CLAR's -16.8%, ROIC 25.7% vs -10.7% |
JOUT vs YETI vs CLAR vs MBUU vs HZO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
JOUT vs YETI vs CLAR vs MBUU vs HZO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
YETI leads in 3 of 6 categories
HZO leads 1 • JOUT leads 0 • CLAR leads 0 • MBUU leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
YETI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HZO is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.2B annually — 8.9x CLAR's $252M. YETI is the more profitable business, keeping 8.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CLAR's -17.7%. On growth, JOUT holds the edge at +15.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $652M | $1.9B | $252M | $826M | $2.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $27M | $259M | -$18M | $42M | $11M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$15M | $159M | -$45M | -$905,000 | -$64M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $25M | $264M | -$12M | $40M | $169M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +37.5% | +57.0% | +32.6% | +15.0% | +32.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.0% | +10.8% | -10.6% | +0.1% | -0.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.3% | +8.4% | -17.7% | -0.1% | -2.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.8% | +13.9% | -4.9% | +4.8% | +7.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +15.5% | +8.3% | +2.5% | +3.1% | -16.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.1% | -35.0% | +35.7% | -119.7% | -185.7% |
Valuation Metrics
HZO leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 24.8x trailing earnings, YETI trades at a 32% valuation discount to MBUU's 36.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MBUU's 8.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than JOUT's 81.7x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $490M | $3.8B | $119M | $547M | $749M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $363M | $3.9B | $95M | $536M | $1.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -13.97x | 24.84x | -2.56x | 36.68x | -23.78x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 62.40x | 17.52x | — | 19.47x | 46.53x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 8.94x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 81.72x | 14.41x | — | 8.88x | 11.97x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.83x | 2.04x | 0.48x | 0.68x | 0.32x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.15x | 6.33x | 0.61x | 1.06x | 0.79x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.19x | 18.01x | — | 19.15x | 62.71x |
Profitability & Efficiency
YETI leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
YETI delivers a 22.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $-21 for CLAR. MBUU carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HZO's 1.31x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MBUU scores 7/9 vs CLAR's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.6% | +22.5% | -21.2% | -0.2% | -6.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.5% | +12.5% | -16.8% | -0.1% | -2.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -3.7% | +25.7% | -10.7% | +3.2% | +3.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.1% | +22.8% | -11.5% | +3.6% | +6.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.12x | 0.35x | 0.06x | 0.05x | 1.31x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$128M | $40M | -$24M | -$12M | $1.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $176M | $188M | $37M | $37M | $170M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $49M | $228M | $12M | $25M | $1.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 68.93x | 94.46x | — | 0.77x | 0.71x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
YETI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HZO five years ago would be worth $7,419 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,445 for CLAR. Over the past 12 months, YETI leads with a +60.3% total return vs MBUU's -13.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors YETI at 11.7% vs CLAR's -25.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +9.6% | +12.4% | -6.3% | -2.6% | +41.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +58.7% | +60.3% | -10.6% | -13.7% | +35.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -15.8% | +39.3% | -59.3% | -53.3% | -0.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -56.4% | -46.6% | -85.5% | -61.0% | -25.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +115.1% | +196.6% | -9.4% | +102.6% | +108.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -5.6% | +11.7% | -25.9% | -22.4% | -0.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — JOUT and YETI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JOUT is the less volatile stock with a 0.87 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HZO's 2.04 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. YETI currently trades 97.9% from its 52-week high vs MBUU's 70.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.87x | 1.63x | 1.37x | 1.66x | 2.04x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $53.54 | $51.49 | $4.03 | $39.65 | $36.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $28.80 | $29.12 | $2.52 | $23.84 | $21.41 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +87.4% | +97.9% | +76.9% | +70.3% | +93.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.0 | 69.2 | 57.6 | 50.6 | 53.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 81K | 1.5M | 202K | 337K | 303K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CLAR and MBUU and HZO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: JOUT as "Buy", YETI as "Buy", CLAR as "Hold", MBUU as "Buy", HZO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 27.4% upside for CLAR (target: $4) vs -3.9% for HZO (target: $33). For income investors, CLAR offers the higher dividend yield at 3.23% vs JOUT's 2.81%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $50.44 | $3.95 | $32.75 | $32.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 22 | 11 | 16 | 17 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.8% | — | +3.2% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.32 | — | $0.10 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +7.8% | +0.0% | +6.6% | +3.7% |
YETI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). HZO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
JOUT vs YETI vs CLAR vs MBUU vs HZO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is JOUT or YETI or CLAR or MBUU or HZO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, YETI Holdings, Inc.
(YETI) is the stronger pick with 2. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 2% for Clarus Corporation (CLAR). YETI Holdings, Inc. (YETI) offers the better valuation at 24. 8x trailing P/E (17. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Johnson Outdoors Inc. (JOUT) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — JOUT or YETI or CLAR or MBUU or HZO?
On trailing P/E, YETI Holdings, Inc.
(YETI) is the cheapest at 24. 8x versus Malibu Boats, Inc. at 36. 7x. On forward P/E, YETI Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 17. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — JOUT or YETI or CLAR or MBUU or HZO?
Over the past 5 years, MarineMax, Inc.
(HZO) delivered a total return of -25. 8%, compared to -85. 5% for Clarus Corporation (CLAR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: YETI returned +196. 6% versus CLAR's -9. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — JOUT or YETI or CLAR or MBUU or HZO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Johnson Outdoors Inc.
(JOUT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 87β versus MarineMax, Inc. 's 2. 04β — meaning HZO is approximately 134% more volatile than JOUT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Malibu Boats, Inc. (MBUU) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 131% for MarineMax, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — JOUT or YETI or CLAR or MBUU or HZO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), YETI Holdings, Inc.
(YETI) is pulling ahead at 2. 1% versus -5. 2% for Clarus Corporation (CLAR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Malibu Boats, Inc. grew EPS 127. 7% year-over-year, compared to -186. 7% for MarineMax, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, YETI leads at 5. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — JOUT or YETI or CLAR or MBUU or HZO?
YETI Holdings, Inc.
(YETI) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 9% net margin versus -18. 6% for Clarus Corporation — meaning it keeps 8. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: YETI leads at 11. 4% versus -10. 7% for CLAR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — YETI leads at 57. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is JOUT or YETI or CLAR or MBUU or HZO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, YETI Holdings, Inc.
(YETI) trades at 17. 5x forward P/E versus 62. 4x for Johnson Outdoors Inc. — 44. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CLAR: 27. 4% to $3. 95.
08Which pays a better dividend — JOUT or YETI or CLAR or MBUU or HZO?
In this comparison, CLAR (3.
2% yield), JOUT (2. 8% yield) pay a dividend. YETI, MBUU, HZO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is JOUT or YETI or CLAR or MBUU or HZO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Johnson Outdoors Inc.
(JOUT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 87), 2. 8% yield, +115. 1% 10Y return). MarineMax, Inc. (HZO) carries a higher beta of 2. 04 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JOUT: +115. 1%, HZO: +108. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between JOUT and YETI and CLAR and MBUU and HZO?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: JOUT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; YETI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CLAR is a small-cap income-oriented stock; MBUU is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HZO is a small-cap quality compounder stock. JOUT, CLAR pay a dividend while YETI, MBUU, HZO do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.