Financial - Credit Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
JSM vs SOFI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Credit Services
JSM vs SOFI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services |
| Market Cap | $5.11B | $20.79B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.11B | $4.77B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-60M | $481M |
| Gross Margin | 95.2% | 75.1% |
| Operating Margin | 81.7% | 11.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 27.0x |
| Total Debt | $5.07B | $1.82B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.10B | $4.93B |
JSM vs SOFI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Navient Corporation… (JSM) | 100 | 81.0 | -19.0% |
| SoFi Technologies, … (SOFI) | 100 | 155.5 | +55.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: JSM vs SOFI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
JSM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.66, yield 3.4%
- 66.3% 10Y total return vs SOFI's 55.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.66, current ratio 0.41x
SOFI is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 28.8%, EPS growth 0.0%
- 28.8% NII/revenue growth vs JSM's -18.4%
- +28.0% vs JSM's +13.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 28.8% NII/revenue growth vs JSM's -18.4% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs SOFI's 0.6% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.66 vs SOFI's 2.54 | |
| Dividends | 3.4% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +28.0% vs JSM's +13.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs SOFI's 0.6% |
JSM vs SOFI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
JSM vs SOFI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JSM leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SOFI is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.8B annually — 1.5x JSM's $3.1B. SOFI is the more profitable business, keeping 10.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to JSM's -2.6%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.1B | $4.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.4B | $760M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$60M | $481M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $323M | -$2.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +95.2% | +75.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +81.7% | +11.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.6% | +10.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +14.2% | -83.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.5% | -56.7% |
Valuation Metrics
JSM leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, JSM's 3.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SOFI's 23.3x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.1B | $20.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $8.1B | $17.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -22.74x | 41.79x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 26.95x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.18x | 23.25x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.64x | 4.36x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.76x | 1.95x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.59x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
SOFI leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SOFI delivers a 5.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-2 for JSM. SOFI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JSM's 2.11x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), JSM scores 6/9 vs SOFI's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.5% | +5.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.1% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.1% | +3.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.6% | +1.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.11x | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.0B | -$3.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.1B | $4.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5.1B | $1.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.48x | 0.45x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SOFI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SOFI five years ago would be worth $10,867 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,479 for JSM. Over the past 12 months, SOFI leads with a +28.0% total return vs JSM's +13.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SOFI at 43.9% vs JSM's 7.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -5.5% | -40.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +13.5% | +28.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +25.5% | +198.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +4.8% | +8.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +66.3% | +55.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +7.9% | +43.9% |
Risk & Volatility
JSM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JSM is the less volatile stock with a 0.66 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SOFI's 2.54 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JSM currently trades 90.3% from its 52-week high vs SOFI's 49.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.66x | 2.54x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.65 | $32.73 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.30 | $12.44 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.3% | +49.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.1 | 39.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 17K | 66.0M |
Analyst Outlook
JSM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates JSM as "Hold" and SOFI as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 28.2% upside for SOFI (target: $21) vs -6.2% for JSM (target: $18). JSM is the only dividend payer here at 3.45% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $17.50 | $20.89 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 27 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.4% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.64 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.2% | +0.3% |
JSM leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). SOFI leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns).
JSM vs SOFI: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is JSM or SOFI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SoFi Technologies, Inc.
(SOFI) is the stronger pick with 28. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -18. 4% for Navient Corporation SR NT 6% 121543 (JSM). SoFi Technologies, Inc. (SOFI) offers the better valuation at 41. 8x trailing P/E (27. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Navient Corporation SR NT 6% 121543 (JSM) a "Hold" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — JSM or SOFI?
Over the past 5 years, SoFi Technologies, Inc.
(SOFI) delivered a total return of +8. 7%, compared to +4. 8% for Navient Corporation SR NT 6% 121543 (JSM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JSM returned +66. 3% versus SOFI's +55. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — JSM or SOFI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Navient Corporation SR NT 6% 121543 (JSM) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
66β versus SoFi Technologies, Inc. 's 2. 54β — meaning SOFI is approximately 286% more volatile than JSM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SoFi Technologies, Inc. (SOFI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 2% for Navient Corporation SR NT 6% 121543 — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — JSM or SOFI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SoFi Technologies, Inc.
(SOFI) is pulling ahead at 28. 8% versus -18. 4% for Navient Corporation SR NT 6% 121543 (JSM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SoFi Technologies, Inc. grew EPS 0. 0% year-over-year, compared to -168. 3% for Navient Corporation SR NT 6% 121543. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — JSM or SOFI?
SoFi Technologies, Inc.
(SOFI) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 1% net margin versus -2. 6% for Navient Corporation SR NT 6% 121543 — meaning it keeps 10. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JSM leads at 81. 7% versus 11. 0% for SOFI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JSM leads at 95. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is JSM or SOFI more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SOFI: 28.
2% to $20. 89.
07Which pays a better dividend — JSM or SOFI?
In this comparison, JSM (3.
4% yield) pays a dividend. SOFI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is JSM or SOFI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Navient Corporation SR NT 6% 121543 (JSM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
66), 3. 4% yield). SoFi Technologies, Inc. (SOFI) carries a higher beta of 2. 54 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JSM: +66. 3%, SOFI: +55. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between JSM and SOFI?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: JSM is a small-cap income-oriented stock; SOFI is a mid-cap high-growth stock. JSM pays a dividend while SOFI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.