Financial - Credit Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
JSM vs SOFI vs LC vs NAVI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Credit Services
JSM vs SOFI vs LC vs NAVI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services |
| Market Cap | $5.14B | $20.40B | $1.92B | $826M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.11B | $4.77B | $1.33B | $3.23B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-60M | $481M | $136M | $-60M |
| Gross Margin | 95.2% | 75.1% | 64.7% | 87.0% |
| Operating Margin | 81.7% | 11.0% | 25.0% | 77.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 26.5x | 9.6x | 12.3x |
| Total Debt | $5.07B | $1.82B | $16M | $45.71B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.10B | $4.93B | $918M | $2.10B |
JSM vs SOFI vs LC vs NAVI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Navient Corporation… (JSM) | 100 | 81.4 | -18.6% |
| SoFi Technologies, … (SOFI) | 100 | 152.7 | +52.7% |
| LendingClub Corpora… (LC) | 100 | 209.1 | +109.1% |
| Navient Corporation (NAVI) | 100 | 93.8 | -6.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: JSM vs SOFI vs LC vs NAVI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
JSM has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.66, yield 3.4%
- 68.2% 10Y total return vs SOFI's 52.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.66, current ratio 0.41x
- Beta 0.66, yield 3.4%, current ratio 0.41x
SOFI is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 28.8%, EPS growth 0.0%
- 28.8% NII/revenue growth vs NAVI's -23.7%
LC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if bank quality is your priority.
- NIM 5.4% vs NAVI's 1.1%
- Lower P/E (9.6x vs 26.5x)
- +62.4% vs NAVI's -25.1%
NAVI is the clearest fit if your priority is quality and efficiency.
- Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs SOFI's 0.6% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs SOFI's 0.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 28.8% NII/revenue growth vs NAVI's -23.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.6x vs 26.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs SOFI's 0.6% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.66 vs SOFI's 2.54 | |
| Dividends | 3.4% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs NAVI's 7.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +62.4% vs NAVI's -25.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs SOFI's 0.6% |
JSM vs SOFI vs LC vs NAVI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
JSM vs SOFI vs LC vs NAVI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
JSM leads in 2 of 6 categories
NAVI leads 1 • LC leads 1 • SOFI leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JSM leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SOFI is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.8B annually — 3.6x LC's $1.3B. LC is the more profitable business, keeping 10.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to JSM's -2.6%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.1B | $4.8B | $1.3B | $3.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.4B | $760M | $287M | $544M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$60M | $481M | $136M | -$60M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $323M | -$2.6B | -$2.9B | $323M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +95.2% | +75.1% | +64.7% | +87.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +81.7% | +11.0% | +25.0% | +77.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.6% | +10.1% | +10.2% | -2.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +14.2% | -83.5% | -2.1% | +13.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.5% | -56.7% | +3.2% | +9.7% |
Valuation Metrics
NAVI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.5x trailing earnings, LC trades at a 65% valuation discount to SOFI's 41.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, LC's 2.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SOFI's 22.8x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.1B | $20.4B | $1.9B | $826M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $8.1B | $17.3B | $1.0B | $44.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -22.85x | 41.03x | 14.51x | -10.85x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 26.45x | 9.56x | 12.29x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.19x | 22.75x | 2.57x | 17.81x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.65x | 4.28x | 1.44x | 0.26x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.77x | 1.91x | 1.32x | 0.36x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.65x | — | — | 1.87x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LC leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LC delivers a 9.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-2 for NAVI. LC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NAVI's 19.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), JSM scores 6/9 vs SOFI's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.5% | +5.9% | +9.5% | -2.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.1% | +1.1% | +1.2% | -0.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.1% | +3.6% | +17.3% | +3.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.6% | +1.2% | +3.3% | +5.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 3 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.11x | 0.17x | 0.01x | 19.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.0B | -$3.1B | -$902M | $43.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.1B | $4.9B | $918M | $2.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5.1B | $1.8B | $16M | $45.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.48x | 0.45x | 0.67x | 0.21x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — JSM and SOFI and LC each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LC five years ago would be worth $11,510 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,915 for NAVI. Over the past 12 months, LC leads with a +62.4% total return vs NAVI's -25.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SOFI at 43.0% vs NAVI's -10.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -5.1% | -41.7% | -12.7% | -30.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +12.6% | +23.0% | +62.4% | -25.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +26.0% | +192.5% | +142.9% | -27.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +4.7% | -3.1% | +15.1% | -30.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +68.2% | +52.7% | -27.7% | +15.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.0% | +43.0% | +34.4% | -10.3% |
Risk & Volatility
JSM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JSM is the less volatile stock with a 0.66 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SOFI's 2.54 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JSM currently trades 90.8% from its 52-week high vs SOFI's 48.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.66x | 2.54x | 2.36x | 0.92x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.65 | $32.73 | $21.67 | $16.07 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.30 | $12.56 | $9.70 | $7.80 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.8% | +48.9% | +77.0% | +54.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.7 | 41.9 | 57.4 | 48.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 17K | 65.8M | 2.1M | 923K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — JSM and NAVI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: JSM as "Hold", SOFI as "Hold", LC as "Buy", NAVI as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 36.3% upside for LC (target: $23) vs -6.6% for JSM (target: $18). For income investors, NAVI offers the higher dividend yield at 7.24% vs JSM's 3.43%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $17.50 | $20.89 | $22.75 | $8.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 27 | 29 | 24 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.4% | — | — | +7.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.64 | — | — | $0.64 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.2% | +0.3% | 0.0% | +13.4% |
JSM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). NAVI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
JSM vs SOFI vs LC vs NAVI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is JSM or SOFI or LC or NAVI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SoFi Technologies, Inc.
(SOFI) is the stronger pick with 28. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -23. 7% for Navient Corporation (NAVI). LendingClub Corporation (LC) offers the better valuation at 14. 5x trailing P/E (9. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate LendingClub Corporation (LC) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — JSM or SOFI or LC or NAVI?
On trailing P/E, LendingClub Corporation (LC) is the cheapest at 14.
5x versus SoFi Technologies, Inc. at 41. 0x. On forward P/E, LendingClub Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — JSM or SOFI or LC or NAVI?
Over the past 5 years, LendingClub Corporation (LC) delivered a total return of +15.
1%, compared to -30. 9% for Navient Corporation (NAVI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JSM returned +68. 2% versus LC's -27. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — JSM or SOFI or LC or NAVI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Navient Corporation SR NT 6% 121543 (JSM) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
66β versus SoFi Technologies, Inc. 's 2. 54β — meaning SOFI is approximately 286% more volatile than JSM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, LendingClub Corporation (LC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 19% for Navient Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — JSM or SOFI or LC or NAVI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SoFi Technologies, Inc.
(SOFI) is pulling ahead at 28. 8% versus -23. 7% for Navient Corporation (NAVI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: LendingClub Corporation grew EPS 155. 6% year-over-year, compared to -168. 6% for Navient Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — JSM or SOFI or LC or NAVI?
LendingClub Corporation (LC) is the more profitable company, earning 10.
2% net margin versus -2. 6% for Navient Corporation SR NT 6% 121543 — meaning it keeps 10. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JSM leads at 81. 7% versus 11. 0% for SOFI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JSM leads at 95. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is JSM or SOFI or LC or NAVI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, LendingClub Corporation (LC) trades at 9.
6x forward P/E versus 26. 5x for SoFi Technologies, Inc. — 16. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LC: 36. 3% to $22. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — JSM or SOFI or LC or NAVI?
In this comparison, NAVI (7.
2% yield), JSM (3. 4% yield) pay a dividend. SOFI, LC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is JSM or SOFI or LC or NAVI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Navient Corporation SR NT 6% 121543 (JSM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
66), 3. 4% yield). LendingClub Corporation (LC) carries a higher beta of 2. 36 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JSM: +68. 2%, LC: -27. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between JSM and SOFI and LC and NAVI?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: JSM is a small-cap income-oriented stock; SOFI is a mid-cap high-growth stock; LC is a small-cap deep-value stock; NAVI is a small-cap income-oriented stock. JSM, NAVI pay a dividend while SOFI, LC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.