Medical - Care Facilities
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
JYNT vs XPOF vs HIMS vs PLNT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Leisure
Medical - Equipment & Services
Leisure
JYNT vs XPOF vs HIMS vs PLNT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Care Facilities | Leisure | Medical - Equipment & Services | Leisure |
| Market Cap | $124M | $244M | $6.63B | $3.52B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $57M | $299M | $2.35B | $1.38B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $3M | $-34M | $128M | $229M |
| Gross Margin | 78.5% | 83.2% | 69.7% | 54.2% |
| Operating Margin | 1.1% | 7.8% | 4.6% | 29.6% |
| Forward P/E | 44.9x | 10.9x | 51.5x | 13.0x |
| Total Debt | $2M | $525M | $1.12B | $443M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $24M | $46M | $229M | $346M |
JYNT vs XPOF vs HIMS vs PLNT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Joint Corp. (JYNT) | 100 | 11.0 | -89.0% |
| Xponential Fitness,… (XPOF) | 100 | 55.8 | -44.2% |
| Hims & Hers Health,… (HIMS) | 100 | 324.5 | +224.5% |
| Planet Fitness, Inc. (PLNT) | 100 | 58.5 | -41.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: JYNT vs XPOF vs HIMS vs PLNT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
JYNT is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.98, Low D/E 13.3%, current ratio 1.59x
- -12.8% vs PLNT's -56.7%
XPOF is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.94, yield 2.5%
- Lower P/E (10.9x vs 13.0x)
- 2.5% yield, vs PLNT's 0.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
HIMS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 59.0%, EPS growth -3.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 64.5%
- 59.0% revenue growth vs XPOF's -1.7%
PLNT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and defensive.
- 203.6% 10Y total return vs HIMS's 161.9%
- Beta 0.31, yield 0.0%, current ratio 2.11x
- 16.5% margin vs XPOF's -11.3%
- Beta 0.31 vs HIMS's 2.40
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 59.0% revenue growth vs XPOF's -1.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.9x vs 13.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.5% margin vs XPOF's -11.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.31 vs HIMS's 2.40 | |
| Dividends | 2.5% yield, vs PLNT's 0.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -12.8% vs PLNT's -56.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.4% ROA vs XPOF's -9.5%, ROIC 35.2% vs 75.0% |
JYNT vs XPOF vs HIMS vs PLNT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
JYNT vs XPOF vs HIMS vs PLNT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
XPOF leads in 2 of 6 categories
PLNT leads 1 • HIMS leads 1 • JYNT leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PLNT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HIMS is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.3B annually — 41.4x JYNT's $57M. PLNT is the more profitable business, keeping 16.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to XPOF's -11.3%. On growth, HIMS holds the edge at +28.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $57M | $299M | $2.3B | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2M | $35M | $164M | $568M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $3M | -$34M | $128M | $229M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3M | -$3M | $73M | $267M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +78.5% | +83.2% | +69.7% | +54.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.1% | +7.8% | +4.6% | +29.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.7% | -11.3% | +5.5% | +16.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.7% | -1.1% | +3.1% | +19.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.3% | -21.0% | +28.4% | +21.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +71.4% | +79.1% | -27.3% | +30.0% |
Valuation Metrics
XPOF leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.8x trailing earnings, PLNT trades at a 67% valuation discount to HIMS's 50.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PLNT's 6.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than JYNT's 126.9x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $124M | $244M | $6.6B | $3.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $103M | $723M | $7.5B | $3.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 45.63x | -4.45x | 50.32x | 16.80x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 44.85x | 10.90x | 51.51x | 13.04x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 1.80x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 126.93x | 7.89x | 42.68x | 6.57x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.26x | 0.78x | 2.82x | 2.66x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 8.70x | — | 12.25x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 370.99x | 9.86x | 89.61x | 13.82x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — JYNT and PLNT each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HIMS delivers a 23.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $17 for JYNT. JYNT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HIMS's 2.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PLNT scores 9/9 vs HIMS's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +16.9% | — | +23.7% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.0% | -9.5% | +6.0% | +7.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +75.0% | +10.7% | +35.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.9% | +30.3% | +10.9% | +14.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.13x | — | 2.07x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$22M | $479M | $892M | $97M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $24M | $46M | $229M | $346M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $525M | $1.1B | $443M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -0.24x | — | 6.73x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HIMS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HIMS five years ago would be worth $23,764 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,608 for JYNT. Over the past 12 months, JYNT leads with a -12.8% total return vs PLNT's -56.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HIMS at 29.4% vs XPOF's -39.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -2.0% | -18.5% | -23.2% | -59.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -12.8% | -22.6% | -51.0% | -56.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -41.0% | -77.4% | +116.6% | -38.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -83.9% | -46.6% | +137.6% | -42.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +191.9% | -46.6% | +161.9% | +203.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -16.1% | -39.1% | +29.4% | -15.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — JYNT and PLNT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PLNT is the less volatile stock with a 0.31 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HIMS's 2.40 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JYNT currently trades 64.4% from its 52-week high vs HIMS's 36.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.98x | 1.94x | 2.40x | 0.31x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.47 | $11.14 | $70.43 | $114.47 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.50 | $3.83 | $13.74 | $37.03 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +64.4% | +58.7% | +36.4% | +38.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.3 | 48.4 | 54.5 | 32.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 57K | 626K | 34.9M | 1.8M |
Analyst Outlook
XPOF leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: JYNT as "Buy", XPOF as "Buy", HIMS as "Hold", PLNT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 170.8% upside for PLNT (target: $119) vs 15.6% for HIMS (target: $30). XPOF is the only dividend payer here at 2.50% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $20.00 | $8.00 | $29.67 | $119.17 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 14 | 19 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.5% | — | +0.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.16 | — | $0.02 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +9.1% | 0.0% | +1.4% | +14.2% |
XPOF leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). PLNT leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
JYNT vs XPOF vs HIMS vs PLNT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is JYNT or XPOF or HIMS or PLNT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) is the stronger pick with 59. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 7% for Xponential Fitness, Inc. (XPOF). Planet Fitness, Inc. (PLNT) offers the better valuation at 16. 8x trailing P/E (13. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Joint Corp. (JYNT) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — JYNT or XPOF or HIMS or PLNT?
On trailing P/E, Planet Fitness, Inc.
(PLNT) is the cheapest at 16. 8x versus Hims & Hers Health, Inc. at 50. 3x. On forward P/E, Xponential Fitness, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — JYNT or XPOF or HIMS or PLNT?
Over the past 5 years, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) delivered a total return of +137. 6%, compared to -83. 9% for The Joint Corp. (JYNT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PLNT returned +203. 6% versus XPOF's -46. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — JYNT or XPOF or HIMS or PLNT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Planet Fitness, Inc.
(PLNT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 31β versus Hims & Hers Health, Inc. 's 2. 40β — meaning HIMS is approximately 669% more volatile than PLNT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Joint Corp. (JYNT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 2% for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — JYNT or XPOF or HIMS or PLNT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) is pulling ahead at 59. 0% versus -1. 7% for Xponential Fitness, Inc. (XPOF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Joint Corp. grew EPS 133. 9% year-over-year, compared to -3. 8% for Hims & Hers Health, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HIMS leads at 64. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — JYNT or XPOF or HIMS or PLNT?
Planet Fitness, Inc.
(PLNT) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 5% net margin versus -10. 7% for Xponential Fitness, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PLNT leads at 29. 8% versus -1. 6% for JYNT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLNT leads at 82. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is JYNT or XPOF or HIMS or PLNT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Xponential Fitness, Inc.
(XPOF) trades at 10. 9x forward P/E versus 51. 5x for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — 40. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PLNT: 170. 8% to $119. 17.
08Which pays a better dividend — JYNT or XPOF or HIMS or PLNT?
In this comparison, XPOF (2.
5% yield) pays a dividend. JYNT, HIMS, PLNT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is JYNT or XPOF or HIMS or PLNT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Planet Fitness, Inc.
(PLNT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 31), +203. 6% 10Y return). Hims & Hers Health, Inc. (HIMS) carries a higher beta of 2. 40 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PLNT: +203. 6%, HIMS: +161. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between JYNT and XPOF and HIMS and PLNT?
These companies operate in different sectors (JYNT (Healthcare) and XPOF (Consumer Cyclical) and HIMS (Healthcare) and PLNT (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: JYNT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; XPOF is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HIMS is a small-cap high-growth stock; PLNT is a small-cap deep-value stock. XPOF pays a dividend while JYNT, HIMS, PLNT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.