Software - Application
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
KARO vs SPNS vs GWRE vs IOT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Software - Application
Software - Infrastructure
KARO vs SPNS vs GWRE vs IOT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Application | Software - Application | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $1.55B | $2.43B | $11.70B | $8.03B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.24B | $564M | $1.34B | $1.62B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.02B | $64M | $189M | $-9M |
| Gross Margin | 69.3% | 44.3% | 63.8% | 76.7% |
| Operating Margin | 27.7% | 13.7% | 6.8% | -3.2% |
| Forward P/E | 1.5x | 27.9x | 39.4x | 58.6x |
| Total Debt | $728M | $64M | $716M | $73M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.05B | $164M | $699M | $319M |
KARO vs SPNS vs GWRE vs IOT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Karooooo Ltd. (KARO) | 100 | 123.1 | +23.1% |
| Sapiens Internation… (SPNS) | 100 | 125.6 | +25.6% |
| Guidewire Software,… (GWRE) | 100 | 122.0 | +22.0% |
| Samsara Inc. (IOT) | 100 | 105.8 | +5.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KARO vs SPNS vs GWRE vs IOT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KARO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.09, yield 2.5%
- PEG 0.09 vs SPNS's 1.40
- Lower P/E (1.5x vs 58.6x)
- 19.5% margin vs IOT's -0.6%
SPNS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- 301.1% 10Y total return vs GWRE's 149.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.45, Low D/E 13.3%, current ratio 2.24x
- Beta 0.45, yield 1.3%, current ratio 2.24x
- Beta 0.45 vs IOT's 1.36
GWRE lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
IOT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 29.6%, EPS growth 92.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 35.4%
- 29.6% revenue growth vs SPNS's 5.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 29.6% revenue growth vs SPNS's 5.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.5x vs 58.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 19.5% margin vs IOT's -0.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.45 vs IOT's 1.36 | |
| Dividends | 2.5% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs SPNS's 1.3%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +53.4% vs GWRE's -35.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.6% ROA vs IOT's -0.4%, ROIC 34.4% vs -3.8% |
KARO vs SPNS vs GWRE vs IOT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
KARO vs SPNS vs GWRE vs IOT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KARO leads in 2 of 6 categories
IOT leads 1 • SPNS leads 1 • GWRE leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IOT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KARO is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.2B annually — 9.3x SPNS's $564M. KARO is the more profitable business, keeping 19.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IOT's -0.6%. On growth, IOT holds the edge at +28.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.2B | $564M | $1.3B | $1.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.2B | $93M | $103M | -$47M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.0B | $64M | $189M | -$9M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | $72M | $310M | $207M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +69.3% | +44.3% | +63.8% | +76.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +27.7% | +13.7% | +6.8% | -3.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +19.5% | +11.4% | +14.1% | -0.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +20.3% | +12.8% | +23.1% | +12.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +17.8% | +11.2% | +24.0% | +28.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.2% | -24.2% | +2.6% | +2.8% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — KARO and SPNS each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 27.7x trailing earnings, KARO trades at a 84% valuation discount to GWRE's 170.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SPNS offers better value at 1.69x vs KARO's 1.73x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.6B | $2.4B | $11.7B | $8.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.5B | $2.3B | $11.7B | $7.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 27.67x | 33.68x | 170.93x | -1487.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 1.48x | 27.85x | 39.38x | 58.61x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.73x | 1.69x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.04x | 22.11x | 180.79x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.58x | 4.48x | 9.73x | 4.96x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.82x | 5.09x | 8.16x | 12.01x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 27.43x | 33.63x | 39.66x | 38.69x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KARO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KARO delivers a 31.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $32 in annual profit, vs $-1 for IOT. IOT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GWRE's 0.49x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SPNS scores 8/9 vs KARO's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +31.6% | +12.9% | +12.9% | -0.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +19.6% | +8.9% | +7.2% | -0.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +34.4% | +17.4% | +2.3% | -3.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +37.6% | +16.9% | +2.3% | -3.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 8 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.22x | 0.13x | 0.49x | 0.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$319M | -$100M | $17M | -$246M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.0B | $164M | $699M | $319M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $728M | $64M | $716M | $73M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 28.64x | 228.41x | 388.85x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — KARO and SPNS each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SPNS five years ago would be worth $16,401 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,040 for IOT. Over the past 12 months, SPNS leads with a +53.4% total return vs GWRE's -35.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KARO at 34.4% vs IOT's 16.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.4% | — | -26.2% | -12.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +15.9% | +53.4% | -35.1% | -31.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +142.6% | +100.9% | +78.2% | +57.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +37.4% | +64.0% | +41.7% | +20.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +58.8% | +301.1% | +149.8% | +20.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +34.4% | +26.2% | +21.2% | +16.2% |
Risk & Volatility
SPNS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SPNS is the less volatile stock with a 0.45 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IOT's 1.36 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SPNS currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs GWRE's 50.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.09x | 0.45x | 0.50x | 1.36x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $63.36 | $43.52 | $272.60 | $48.41 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $41.25 | $26.14 | $115.57 | $23.38 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +79.2% | +99.8% | +50.8% | +61.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.0 | 69.6 | 49.7 | 50.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 63K | 0 | 1.3M | 6.8M |
Analyst Outlook
KARO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: KARO as "Buy", SPNS as "Hold", GWRE as "Buy", IOT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 77.1% upside for GWRE (target: $245) vs -12.5% for SPNS (target: $38). For income investors, KARO offers the higher dividend yield at 2.45% vs SPNS's 1.30%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $62.00 | $38.00 | $245.17 | $45.82 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 10 | 26 | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.5% | +1.3% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 1 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $20.21 | $0.57 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
KARO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). IOT leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
KARO vs SPNS vs GWRE vs IOT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KARO or SPNS or GWRE or IOT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Samsara Inc.
(IOT) is the stronger pick with 29. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 4% for Sapiens International Corporation N. V. (SPNS). Karooooo Ltd. (KARO) offers the better valuation at 27. 7x trailing P/E (1. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Karooooo Ltd. (KARO) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KARO or SPNS or GWRE or IOT?
On trailing P/E, Karooooo Ltd.
(KARO) is the cheapest at 27. 7x versus Guidewire Software, Inc. at 170. 9x. On forward P/E, Karooooo Ltd. is actually cheaper at 1. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Karooooo Ltd. wins at 0. 09x versus Sapiens International Corporation N. V. 's 1. 40x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KARO or SPNS or GWRE or IOT?
Over the past 5 years, Sapiens International Corporation N.
V. (SPNS) delivered a total return of +64. 0%, compared to +20. 4% for Samsara Inc. (IOT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SPNS returned +301. 1% versus IOT's +20. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KARO or SPNS or GWRE or IOT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sapiens International Corporation N.
V. (SPNS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 45β versus Samsara Inc. 's 1. 36β — meaning IOT is approximately 198% more volatile than SPNS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Samsara Inc. (IOT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 49% for Guidewire Software, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KARO or SPNS or GWRE or IOT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Samsara Inc.
(IOT) is pulling ahead at 29. 6% versus 5. 4% for Sapiens International Corporation N. V. (SPNS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Guidewire Software, Inc. grew EPS 1192% year-over-year, compared to 15. 2% for Sapiens International Corporation N. V.. Over a 3-year CAGR, IOT leads at 35. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KARO or SPNS or GWRE or IOT?
Karooooo Ltd.
(KARO) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 2% net margin versus -0. 6% for Samsara Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KARO leads at 28. 7% versus -3. 2% for IOT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IOT leads at 76. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KARO or SPNS or GWRE or IOT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Karooooo Ltd. (KARO) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 09x versus Sapiens International Corporation N. V. 's 1. 40x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Karooooo Ltd. (KARO) trades at 1. 5x forward P/E versus 58. 6x for Samsara Inc. — 57. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GWRE: 77. 1% to $245. 17.
08Which pays a better dividend — KARO or SPNS or GWRE or IOT?
In this comparison, KARO (2.
5% yield), SPNS (1. 3% yield) pay a dividend. GWRE, IOT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is KARO or SPNS or GWRE or IOT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sapiens International Corporation N.
V. (SPNS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 45), 1. 3% yield, +301. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SPNS: +301. 1%, IOT: +20. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KARO and SPNS and GWRE and IOT?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: KARO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SPNS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GWRE is a mid-cap high-growth stock; IOT is a small-cap high-growth stock. KARO, SPNS pay a dividend while GWRE, IOT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.