Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
KARO vs SPNS vs GWRE vs IOT vs DDOG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Software - Application
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Application
KARO vs SPNS vs GWRE vs IOT vs DDOG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Application | Software - Application | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $1.55B | $2.43B | $11.70B | $8.03B | $71.25B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.24B | $564M | $1.34B | $1.62B | $3.67B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.02B | $64M | $189M | $-9M | $136M |
| Gross Margin | 69.3% | 44.3% | 63.8% | 76.7% | 79.9% |
| Operating Margin | 27.7% | 13.7% | 6.8% | -3.2% | -0.7% |
| Forward P/E | 1.5x | 27.9x | 39.4x | 58.6x | 86.9x |
| Total Debt | $728M | $64M | $716M | $73M | $1.54B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.05B | $164M | $699M | $319M | $401M |
KARO vs SPNS vs GWRE vs IOT vs DDOG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Karooooo Ltd. (KARO) | 100 | 123.1 | +23.1% |
| Sapiens Internation… (SPNS) | 100 | 125.6 | +25.6% |
| Guidewire Software,… (GWRE) | 100 | 122.0 | +22.0% |
| Samsara Inc. (IOT) | 100 | 105.8 | +5.8% |
| Datadog, Inc. (DDOG) | 100 | 112.4 | +12.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KARO vs SPNS vs GWRE vs IOT vs DDOG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KARO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.09, yield 2.5%
- PEG 0.09 vs SPNS's 1.40
- Lower P/E (1.5x vs 86.9x)
- 19.5% margin vs IOT's -0.6%
SPNS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.45, Low D/E 13.3%, current ratio 2.24x
- Beta 0.45, yield 1.3%, current ratio 2.24x
- Beta 0.45 vs IOT's 1.36
Among these 5 stocks, GWRE doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
IOT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 29.6%, EPS growth 92.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 35.4%
- 29.6% revenue growth vs SPNS's 5.4%
DDOG is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 433.0% 10Y total return vs SPNS's 301.1%
- +83.3% vs GWRE's -35.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 29.6% revenue growth vs SPNS's 5.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.5x vs 86.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 19.5% margin vs IOT's -0.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.45 vs IOT's 1.36 | |
| Dividends | 2.5% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs SPNS's 1.3%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +83.3% vs GWRE's -35.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.6% ROA vs IOT's -0.4%, ROIC 34.4% vs -3.8% |
KARO vs SPNS vs GWRE vs IOT vs DDOG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
KARO vs SPNS vs GWRE vs IOT vs DDOG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DDOG leads in 2 of 6 categories
KARO leads 2 • SPNS leads 1 • GWRE leads 0 • IOT leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DDOG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KARO is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.2B annually — 9.3x SPNS's $564M. KARO is the more profitable business, keeping 19.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IOT's -0.6%. On growth, DDOG holds the edge at +32.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.2B | $564M | $1.3B | $1.6B | $3.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.2B | $93M | $103M | -$47M | $73M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.0B | $64M | $189M | -$9M | $136M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | $72M | $310M | $207M | $1.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +69.3% | +44.3% | +63.8% | +76.7% | +79.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +27.7% | +13.7% | +6.8% | -3.2% | -0.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +19.5% | +11.4% | +14.1% | -0.6% | +3.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +20.3% | +12.8% | +23.1% | +12.8% | +29.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +17.8% | +11.2% | +24.0% | +28.3% | +32.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.2% | -24.2% | +2.6% | +2.8% | +120.9% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — KARO and SPNS each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 27.7x trailing earnings, KARO trades at a 96% valuation discount to DDOG's 667.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SPNS offers better value at 1.69x vs KARO's 1.73x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.6B | $2.4B | $11.7B | $8.0B | $71.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.5B | $2.3B | $11.7B | $7.8B | $72.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 27.67x | 33.68x | 170.93x | -1487.00x | 667.20x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 1.48x | 27.85x | 39.38x | 58.61x | 86.87x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.73x | 1.69x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.04x | 22.11x | 180.79x | — | 926.09x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.58x | 4.48x | 9.73x | 4.96x | 20.79x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.82x | 5.09x | 8.16x | 12.01x | 19.49x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 27.43x | 33.63x | 39.66x | 38.69x | 71.21x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KARO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KARO delivers a 31.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $32 in annual profit, vs $-1 for IOT. IOT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GWRE's 0.49x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SPNS scores 8/9 vs DDOG's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +31.6% | +12.9% | +12.9% | -0.7% | +3.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +19.6% | +8.9% | +7.2% | -0.4% | +2.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +34.4% | +17.4% | +2.3% | -3.8% | -0.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +37.6% | +16.9% | +2.3% | -3.6% | -1.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.22x | 0.13x | 0.49x | 0.05x | 0.41x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$319M | -$100M | $17M | -$246M | $1.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.0B | $164M | $699M | $319M | $401M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $728M | $64M | $716M | $73M | $1.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 28.64x | 228.41x | 388.85x | — | 4.46x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DDOG leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in DDOG five years ago would be worth $26,042 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,040 for IOT. Over the past 12 months, DDOG leads with a +83.3% total return vs GWRE's -35.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DDOG at 36.6% vs IOT's 16.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.4% | — | -26.2% | -12.3% | +49.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +15.9% | +53.4% | -35.1% | -31.5% | +83.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +142.6% | +100.9% | +78.2% | +57.0% | +154.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +37.4% | +64.0% | +41.7% | +20.4% | +160.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +58.8% | +301.1% | +149.8% | +20.4% | +433.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +34.4% | +26.2% | +21.2% | +16.2% | +36.6% |
Risk & Volatility
SPNS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SPNS is the less volatile stock with a 0.45 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IOT's 1.36 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SPNS currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs GWRE's 50.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.09x | 0.45x | 0.50x | 1.36x | 1.33x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $63.36 | $43.52 | $272.60 | $48.41 | $201.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $41.25 | $26.14 | $115.57 | $23.38 | $98.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +79.2% | +99.8% | +50.8% | +61.4% | +99.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.0 | 69.6 | 49.7 | 50.7 | 83.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 63K | 0 | 1.3M | 6.8M | 5.1M |
Analyst Outlook
KARO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: KARO as "Buy", SPNS as "Hold", GWRE as "Buy", IOT as "Buy", DDOG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 77.1% upside for GWRE (target: $245) vs -12.5% for SPNS (target: $38). For income investors, KARO offers the higher dividend yield at 2.45% vs SPNS's 1.30%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $62.00 | $38.00 | $245.17 | $45.82 | $202.92 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 10 | 26 | 18 | 47 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.5% | +1.3% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 1 | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $20.21 | $0.57 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
DDOG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). KARO leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
KARO vs SPNS vs GWRE vs IOT vs DDOG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KARO or SPNS or GWRE or IOT or DDOG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Samsara Inc.
(IOT) is the stronger pick with 29. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 4% for Sapiens International Corporation N. V. (SPNS). Karooooo Ltd. (KARO) offers the better valuation at 27. 7x trailing P/E (1. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Karooooo Ltd. (KARO) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KARO or SPNS or GWRE or IOT or DDOG?
On trailing P/E, Karooooo Ltd.
(KARO) is the cheapest at 27. 7x versus Datadog, Inc. at 667. 2x. On forward P/E, Karooooo Ltd. is actually cheaper at 1. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Karooooo Ltd. wins at 0. 09x versus Sapiens International Corporation N. V. 's 1. 40x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KARO or SPNS or GWRE or IOT or DDOG?
Over the past 5 years, Datadog, Inc.
(DDOG) delivered a total return of +160. 4%, compared to +20. 4% for Samsara Inc. (IOT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DDOG returned +433. 0% versus IOT's +20. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KARO or SPNS or GWRE or IOT or DDOG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sapiens International Corporation N.
V. (SPNS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 45β versus Samsara Inc. 's 1. 36β — meaning IOT is approximately 198% more volatile than SPNS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Samsara Inc. (IOT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 49% for Guidewire Software, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KARO or SPNS or GWRE or IOT or DDOG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Samsara Inc.
(IOT) is pulling ahead at 29. 6% versus 5. 4% for Sapiens International Corporation N. V. (SPNS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Guidewire Software, Inc. grew EPS 1192% year-over-year, compared to -41. 2% for Datadog, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, IOT leads at 35. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KARO or SPNS or GWRE or IOT or DDOG?
Karooooo Ltd.
(KARO) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 2% net margin versus -0. 6% for Samsara Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KARO leads at 28. 7% versus -3. 2% for IOT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DDOG leads at 80. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KARO or SPNS or GWRE or IOT or DDOG more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Karooooo Ltd. (KARO) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 09x versus Sapiens International Corporation N. V. 's 1. 40x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Karooooo Ltd. (KARO) trades at 1. 5x forward P/E versus 86. 9x for Datadog, Inc. — 85. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GWRE: 77. 1% to $245. 17.
08Which pays a better dividend — KARO or SPNS or GWRE or IOT or DDOG?
In this comparison, KARO (2.
5% yield), SPNS (1. 3% yield) pay a dividend. GWRE, IOT, DDOG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is KARO or SPNS or GWRE or IOT or DDOG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sapiens International Corporation N.
V. (SPNS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 45), 1. 3% yield, +301. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SPNS: +301. 1%, IOT: +20. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KARO and SPNS and GWRE and IOT and DDOG?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: KARO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SPNS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GWRE is a mid-cap high-growth stock; IOT is a small-cap high-growth stock; DDOG is a mid-cap high-growth stock. KARO, SPNS pay a dividend while GWRE, IOT, DDOG do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.