Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

KDK vs TDW vs OII vs AUR vs MBLY

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
KDK
Kodiak AI, Inc. Common Stock

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • CA
Market Cap$1.45B
5Y Perf.-0.1%
TDW
Tidewater Inc.

Oil & Gas Equipment & Services

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$4.05B
5Y Perf.+140.4%
OII
Oceaneering International, Inc.

Oil & Gas Equipment & Services

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$3.80B
5Y Perf.+172.1%
AUR
Aurora Innovation, Inc.

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$14.15B
5Y Perf.+250.5%
MBLY
Mobileye Global Inc.

Auto - Parts

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • IL
Market Cap$7.52B
5Y Perf.-65.0%

KDK vs TDW vs OII vs AUR vs MBLY — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
KDK logoKDK
TDW logoTDW
OII logoOII
AUR logoAUR
MBLY logoMBLY
IndustrySoftware - ApplicationOil & Gas Equipment & ServicesOil & Gas Equipment & ServicesInformation Technology ServicesAuto - Parts
Market Cap$1.45B$4.05B$3.80B$14.15B$7.52B
Revenue (TTM)$4M$1.35B$2.80B$4M$2.01B
Net Income (TTM)$-431M$298M$339M$-831M$-4.11B
Gross Margin-5.4%22.4%20.0%40.8%48.3%
Operating Margin-31.7%20.0%10.3%-233.5%-209.5%
Forward P/E22.9x21.1x34.0x
Total Debt$36M$655M$487M$157M$0.00
Cash & Equiv.$51M$579M$689M$222M$1.84B

KDK vs TDW vs OII vs AUR vs MBLYLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

KDK
TDW
OII
AUR
MBLY
StockOct 22May 26Return
Tidewater Inc. (TDW)100240.4+140.4%
Oceaneering Interna… (OII)100272.1+172.1%
Aurora Innovation, … (AUR)100350.5+250.5%
Mobileye Global Inc. (MBLY)10035.0-65.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: KDK vs TDW vs OII vs AUR vs MBLY

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: TDW leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Oceaneering International, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and recent price momentum and sentiment. MBLY also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
KDK
Kodiak AI, Inc. Common Stock
The Technology Pick

KDK lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: technology exposure
TDW
Tidewater Inc.
The Income Pick

TDW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.73
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.73, Low D/E 48.1%, current ratio 2.90x
  • Beta 0.73, current ratio 2.90x
  • 22.2% margin vs AUR's -207.8%
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
OII
Oceaneering International, Inc.
The Growth Play

OII is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • Rev growth 4.6%, EPS growth 142.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.5%
  • 20.5% 10Y total return vs KDK's -0.3%
  • Lower P/E (21.1x vs 34.0x)
  • +91.7% vs MBLY's -44.4%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
AUR
Aurora Innovation, Inc.
The Technology Pick

Among these 5 stocks, AUR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: technology exposure
MBLY
Mobileye Global Inc.
The Growth Leader

MBLY ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.

  • 14.5% revenue growth vs KDK's -74.6%
Best for: growth
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthMBLY logoMBLY14.5% revenue growth vs KDK's -74.6%
ValueOII logoOIILower P/E (21.1x vs 34.0x)
Quality / MarginsTDW logoTDW22.2% margin vs AUR's -207.8%
Stability / SafetyTDW logoTDWBeta 0.73 vs AUR's 2.51
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)OII logoOII+91.7% vs MBLY's -44.4%
Efficiency (ROA)TDW logoTDW13.4% ROA vs KDK's -329.7%

KDK vs TDW vs OII vs AUR vs MBLY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

KDKKodiak AI, Inc. Common Stock

Segment breakdown not available.

TDWTidewater Inc.
FY 2025
Vessel
99.0%$1.3B
Product and Service, Other
1.0%$14M
OIIOceaneering International, Inc.
FY 2025
Subsea Robotics
30.7%$855M
Offshore Projects Group
22.1%$616M
Manufactured Products
20.4%$569M
Aerospace and Defense Technologies
16.5%$460M
Integrity Management & Digital Solutions
10.2%$284M
AURAurora Innovation, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

MBLYMobileye Global Inc.
FY 2025
Mobileye
97.9%$1.9B
Other Operating Segment
2.1%$39M

KDK vs TDW vs OII vs AUR vs MBLY — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLOIILAGGINGTDW

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — TDW and MBLY each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

OII is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.8B annually — 700.5x AUR's $4M. TDW is the more profitable business, keeping 22.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AUR's -207.8%. On growth, MBLY holds the edge at +27.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricKDK logoKDKKodiak AI, Inc. C…TDW logoTDWTidewater Inc.OII logoOIIOceaneering Inter…AUR logoAURAurora Innovation…MBLY logoMBLYMobileye Global I…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$4M$1.3B$2.8B$4M$2.0B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$128M$477M$394M-$903M-$3.8B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$431M$298M$339M-$831M-$4.1B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$173M$282M$240M-$646M$482M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue-5.4%+22.4%+20.0%+40.8%+48.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-31.7%+20.0%+10.3%-233.5%-2.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-103.7%+22.2%+12.1%-207.8%-2.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-41.6%+20.9%+8.6%-161.5%+23.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+24.4%-2.2%+2.7%+27.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+100.0%-85.5%-26.5%+8.3%-35.0%
Evenly matched — TDW and MBLY each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — TDW and OII and MBLY each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 10.9x trailing earnings, OII trades at a 11% valuation discount to TDW's 12.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TDW's 7.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MBLY's 73.8x.

MetricKDK logoKDKKodiak AI, Inc. C…TDW logoTDWTidewater Inc.OII logoOIIOceaneering Inter…AUR logoAURAurora Innovation…MBLY logoMBLYMobileye Global I…
Market CapShares × price$1.4B$4.1B$3.8B$14.2B$7.5B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.4B$4.1B$3.6B$14.1B$5.7B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-1.24x12.27x10.91x-16.41x-19.23x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.22.86x21.11x33.96x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple7.47x8.84x73.78x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue381.27x3.00x1.36x4717.07x3.97x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share3.00x3.58x6.20x0.63x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF11.47x18.27x14.37x
Evenly matched — TDW and OII and MBLY each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

OII leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

OII delivers a 34.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $34 in annual profit, vs $-40 for AUR. AUR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TDW's 0.48x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TDW scores 8/9 vs AUR's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricKDK logoKDKKodiak AI, Inc. C…TDW logoTDWTidewater Inc.OII logoOIIOceaneering Inter…AUR logoAURAurora Innovation…MBLY logoMBLYMobileye Global I…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+23.8%+34.3%-39.6%-37.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-3.3%+13.4%+13.3%-35.9%-35.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital+15.2%+23.4%-35.0%-3.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-164.3%+15.2%+17.7%-42.3%-3.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–948735
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.48x0.45x0.07x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$14M$76M-$201M-$65M-$1.8B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$51M$579M$689M$222M$1.8B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$36M$655M$487M$157M$0
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-99.49x4.05x7.65x
OII leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

AUR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in TDW five years ago would be worth $59,359 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,186 for MBLY. Over the past 12 months, OII leads with a +91.7% total return vs MBLY's -44.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AUR at 69.6% vs MBLY's -37.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricKDK logoKDKKodiak AI, Inc. C…TDW logoTDWTidewater Inc.OII logoOIIOceaneering Inter…AUR logoAURAurora Innovation…MBLY logoMBLYMobileye Global I…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-26.8%+56.0%+53.2%+86.6%-17.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-0.3%+90.4%+91.7%-9.0%-44.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-0.3%+83.5%+135.0%+387.8%-75.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-0.3%+493.6%+167.3%-27.3%-68.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-0.3%-65.6%+20.5%-27.8%-68.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-0.1%+22.4%+33.0%+69.6%-37.6%
AUR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — TDW and OII each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

TDW is the less volatile stock with a 0.73 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AUR's 2.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. OII currently trades 94.9% from its 52-week high vs MBLY's 45.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricKDK logoKDKKodiak AI, Inc. C…TDW logoTDWTidewater Inc.OII logoOIIOceaneering Inter…AUR logoAURAurora Innovation…MBLY logoMBLYMobileye Global I…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.34x0.73x1.02x2.51x1.83x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$11.35$93.13$40.12$8.06$20.18
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$5.43$38.24$18.45$3.60$6.47
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+69.9%+87.5%+94.9%+89.6%+45.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10041.744.855.779.365.7
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded695K846K1.2M21.4M6.1M
Evenly matched — TDW and OII each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

MBLY leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: KDK as "Buy", TDW as "Hold", OII as "Hold", AUR as "Buy", MBLY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 118.5% upside for KDK (target: $17) vs -4.1% for OII (target: $37).

MetricKDK logoKDKKodiak AI, Inc. C…TDW logoTDWTidewater Inc.OII logoOIIOceaneering Inter…AUR logoAURAurora Innovation…MBLY logoMBLYMobileye Global I…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldHoldBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$17.33$101.50$36.50$9.50$14.44
# AnalystsCovering analysts22644726
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises001
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+2.2%+1.2%0.0%+1.3%
MBLY leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

OII leads in 1 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency). AUR leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.

Best OverallOceaneering International, … (OII)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

KDK vs TDW vs OII vs AUR vs MBLY: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is KDK or TDW or OII or AUR or MBLY a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Mobileye Global Inc.

(MBLY) is the stronger pick with 14. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -74. 6% for Kodiak AI, Inc. Common Stock (KDK). Oceaneering International, Inc. (OII) offers the better valuation at 10. 9x trailing P/E (21. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Kodiak AI, Inc. Common Stock (KDK) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — KDK or TDW or OII or AUR or MBLY?

On trailing P/E, Oceaneering International, Inc.

(OII) is the cheapest at 10. 9x versus Tidewater Inc. at 12. 3x. On forward P/E, Oceaneering International, Inc. is actually cheaper at 21. 1x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — KDK or TDW or OII or AUR or MBLY?

Over the past 5 years, Tidewater Inc.

(TDW) delivered a total return of +493. 6%, compared to -68. 1% for Mobileye Global Inc. (MBLY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: OII returned +20. 5% versus MBLY's -68. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — KDK or TDW or OII or AUR or MBLY?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Tidewater Inc.

(TDW) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 73β versus Aurora Innovation, Inc. 's 2. 51β — meaning AUR is approximately 245% more volatile than TDW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Aurora Innovation, Inc. (AUR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 48% for Tidewater Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — KDK or TDW or OII or AUR or MBLY?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Mobileye Global Inc.

(MBLY) is pulling ahead at 14. 5% versus -74. 6% for Kodiak AI, Inc. Common Stock (KDK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Oceaneering International, Inc. grew EPS 142. 4% year-over-year, compared to -1589. 5% for Kodiak AI, Inc. Common Stock. Over a 3-year CAGR, TDW leads at 27. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — KDK or TDW or OII or AUR or MBLY?

Tidewater Inc.

(TDW) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 7% net margin versus -272. 0% for Aurora Innovation, Inc. — meaning it keeps 24. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TDW leads at 21. 4% versus -300. 3% for AUR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MBLY leads at 47. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is KDK or TDW or OII or AUR or MBLY more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Oceaneering International, Inc.

(OII) trades at 21. 1x forward P/E versus 34. 0x for Mobileye Global Inc. — 12. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KDK: 118. 5% to $17. 33.

08

Which pays a better dividend — KDK or TDW or OII or AUR or MBLY?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is KDK or TDW or OII or AUR or MBLY better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Tidewater Inc.

(TDW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 73)). Aurora Innovation, Inc. (AUR) carries a higher beta of 2. 51 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TDW: -65. 6%, AUR: -27. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between KDK and TDW and OII and AUR and MBLY?

These companies operate in different sectors (KDK (Technology) and TDW (Energy) and OII (Energy) and AUR (Technology) and MBLY (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: KDK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TDW is a small-cap deep-value stock; OII is a small-cap deep-value stock; AUR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MBLY is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

KDK

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 12%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TDW

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

OII

Quality Business

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AUR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 2445%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MBLY

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 13%
  • Gross Margin > 28%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform KDK and TDW and OII and AUR and MBLY on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(KDK: 24.4% · TDW: -2.2%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.