Staffing & Employment Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
KELYA vs ASGN vs MAN vs KFRC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Information Technology Services
Staffing & Employment Services
Staffing & Employment Services
KELYA vs ASGN vs MAN vs KFRC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Staffing & Employment Services | Information Technology Services | Staffing & Employment Services | Staffing & Employment Services |
| Market Cap | $349M | $895M | $1.41B | $790M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.09B | $3.98B | $17.96B | $1.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-266M | $114M | $-13M | $35M |
| Gross Margin | 26.3% | 28.4% | 16.7% | 27.2% |
| Operating Margin | -2.8% | 6.1% | 0.8% | 3.8% |
| Forward P/E | 11.0x | 5.8x | 8.3x | 18.0x |
| Total Debt | $159M | $1.17B | $2.39B | $70M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $33M | $102M | $871M | $2M |
KELYA vs ASGN vs MAN vs KFRC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA) | 100 | 64.7 | -35.3% |
| ASGN Incorporated (ASGN) | 100 | 62.9 | -37.1% |
| ManpowerGroup Inc. (MAN) | 100 | 44.0 | -56.0% |
| Kforce Inc. (KFRC) | 100 | 143.1 | +43.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KELYA vs ASGN vs MAN vs KFRC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KELYA lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
ASGN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and quality is your priority.
- Lower P/E (5.8x vs 18.0x)
- 2.9% margin vs KELYA's -8.6%
MAN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 0.6%, EPS growth -109.6%, 3Y rev CAGR -3.2%
- 0.6% revenue growth vs KFRC's -5.4%
- 4.7% yield, vs KFRC's 3.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
KFRC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.53, yield 3.6%
- 195.5% 10Y total return vs MAN's -30.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.53, Low D/E 56.0%, current ratio 1.78x
- Beta 0.53, yield 3.6%, current ratio 1.78x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 0.6% revenue growth vs KFRC's -5.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.8x vs 18.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.9% margin vs KELYA's -8.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.53 vs ASGN's 1.34, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.7% yield, vs KFRC's 3.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +18.9% vs ASGN's -61.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.2% ROA vs KELYA's -11.3%, ROIC 19.1% vs -4.0% |
KELYA vs ASGN vs MAN vs KFRC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
KELYA vs ASGN vs MAN vs KFRC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KFRC leads in 3 of 6 categories
ASGN leads 1 • KELYA leads 0 • MAN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ASGN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MAN is the larger business by revenue, generating $18.0B annually — 13.5x KFRC's $1.3B. ASGN is the more profitable business, keeping 2.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KELYA's -8.6%. On growth, MAN holds the edge at +7.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.1B | $4.0B | $18.0B | $1.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$54M | $360M | $236M | $56M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$266M | $114M | -$13M | $35M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $66M | $288M | -$161M | $43M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +26.3% | +28.4% | +16.7% | +27.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.8% | +6.1% | +0.8% | +3.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -8.6% | +2.9% | -0.1% | +2.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.1% | +7.2% | -0.9% | +3.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | -0.5% | +7.1% | +0.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.1% | -37.9% | +36.2% | +2.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — KELYA and ASGN and MAN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.1x trailing earnings, ASGN trades at a 63% valuation discount to KFRC's 22.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ASGN's 5.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KFRC's 15.4x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $349M | $895M | $1.4B | $790M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $475M | $2.0B | $2.9B | $858M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.34x | 8.06x | -104.90x | 22.05x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.96x | 5.80x | 8.28x | 17.96x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 5.30x | 9.02x | 15.42x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.08x | 0.22x | 0.08x | 0.59x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.35x | 0.51x | 0.69x | 6.17x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 3.06x | 3.11x | — | 16.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KFRC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KFRC delivers a 27.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $-25 for KELYA. KELYA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MAN's 1.16x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KELYA scores 5/9 vs MAN's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -24.6% | +6.3% | -0.6% | +27.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -11.3% | +3.1% | -0.1% | +9.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -4.0% | +6.9% | +5.6% | +19.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -4.3% | +7.2% | +6.2% | +20.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.16x | 0.65x | 1.16x | 0.56x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $126M | $1.1B | $1.5B | $68M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $33M | $102M | $871M | $2M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $159M | $1.2B | $2.4B | $70M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -12.07x | 1.96x | 1.98x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KFRC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KFRC five years ago would be worth $8,325 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,958 for ASGN. Over the past 12 months, KFRC leads with a +18.9% total return vs ASGN's -61.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KFRC at -4.8% vs ASGN's -31.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +13.1% | -55.1% | +1.2% | +39.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -12.2% | -61.5% | -17.0% | +18.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -34.2% | -68.2% | -46.4% | -13.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -58.3% | -80.4% | -64.9% | -16.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -33.0% | -41.9% | -30.8% | +195.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -13.0% | -31.7% | -18.8% | -4.8% |
Risk & Volatility
KFRC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KFRC is the less volatile stock with a 0.53 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ASGN's 1.34 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KFRC currently trades 91.0% from its 52-week high vs ASGN's 34.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.01x | 1.34x | 1.03x | 0.53x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.94 | $60.75 | $47.34 | $47.48 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.98 | $19.31 | $25.15 | $24.49 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +64.9% | +34.5% | +64.3% | +91.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.7 | 18.4 | 47.1 | 65.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 361K | 947K | 1.1M | 305K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MAN and KFRC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: KELYA as "Buy", ASGN as "Hold", MAN as "Hold", KFRC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 79.4% upside for ASGN (target: $38) vs 24.5% for MAN (target: $38). For income investors, MAN offers the higher dividend yield at 4.71% vs KELYA's 3.23%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $15.00 | $37.60 | $37.86 | $71.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 13 | 29 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.2% | — | +4.7% | +3.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | — | 0 | 8 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.31 | — | $1.43 | $1.55 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.5% | +19.0% | +2.7% | +6.4% |
KFRC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). ASGN leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
KELYA vs ASGN vs MAN vs KFRC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KELYA or ASGN or MAN or KFRC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ManpowerGroup Inc.
(MAN) is the stronger pick with 0. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 4% for Kforce Inc. (KFRC). ASGN Incorporated (ASGN) offers the better valuation at 8. 1x trailing P/E (5. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KELYA or ASGN or MAN or KFRC?
On trailing P/E, ASGN Incorporated (ASGN) is the cheapest at 8.
1x versus Kforce Inc. at 22. 1x. On forward P/E, ASGN Incorporated is actually cheaper at 5. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KELYA or ASGN or MAN or KFRC?
Over the past 5 years, Kforce Inc.
(KFRC) delivered a total return of -16. 8%, compared to -80. 4% for ASGN Incorporated (ASGN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KFRC returned +195. 5% versus ASGN's -41. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KELYA or ASGN or MAN or KFRC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kforce Inc.
(KFRC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 53β versus ASGN Incorporated's 1. 34β — meaning ASGN is approximately 153% more volatile than KFRC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 116% for ManpowerGroup Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KELYA or ASGN or MAN or KFRC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ManpowerGroup Inc.
(MAN) is pulling ahead at 0. 6% versus -5. 4% for Kforce Inc. (KFRC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kforce Inc. grew EPS -25. 2% year-over-year, compared to -427. 4% for Kelly Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MAN leads at -3. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KELYA or ASGN or MAN or KFRC?
ASGN Incorporated (ASGN) is the more profitable company, earning 2.
9% net margin versus -6. 0% for Kelly Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 2. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ASGN leads at 6. 5% versus -1. 6% for KELYA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ASGN leads at 27. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KELYA or ASGN or MAN or KFRC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, ASGN Incorporated (ASGN) trades at 5.
8x forward P/E versus 18. 0x for Kforce Inc. — 12. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ASGN: 79. 4% to $37. 60.
08Which pays a better dividend — KELYA or ASGN or MAN or KFRC?
In this comparison, MAN (4.
7% yield), KFRC (3. 6% yield), KELYA (3. 2% yield) pay a dividend. ASGN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is KELYA or ASGN or MAN or KFRC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Kforce Inc.
(KFRC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 53), 3. 6% yield, +195. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KFRC: +195. 5%, ASGN: -41. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KELYA and ASGN and MAN and KFRC?
These companies operate in different sectors (KELYA (Industrials) and ASGN (Technology) and MAN (Industrials) and KFRC (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: KELYA is a small-cap income-oriented stock; ASGN is a small-cap deep-value stock; MAN is a small-cap income-oriented stock; KFRC is a small-cap income-oriented stock. KELYA, MAN, KFRC pay a dividend while ASGN does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.