KELYA vs TBI vs MAN vs ASGN

For growth investors, TrueBlue, Inc.

(TBI) is the stronger pick with 3. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 9% for ASGN Incorporated (ASGN). ASGN Incorporated (ASGN) offers the better valuation at 8. 1x trailing P/E (5. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On forward P/E, ASGN Incorporated is actually cheaper at 5.

8x.

Over the past 5 years, Kelly Services, Inc.

(KELYA) delivered a total return of -58. 3%, compared to -80. 4% for ASGN Incorporated (ASGN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MAN returned -30. 8% versus TBI's -68. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kelly Services, Inc.

(KELYA) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 01β versus ASGN Incorporated's 1. 34β — meaning ASGN is approximately 32% more volatile than KELYA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 116% for ManpowerGroup Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), TrueBlue, Inc.

(TBI) is pulling ahead at 3. 1% versus -2. 9% for ASGN Incorporated (ASGN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TrueBlue, Inc. grew EPS 61. 4% year-over-year, compared to -427. 4% for Kelly Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MAN leads at -3. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

ASGN Incorporated (ASGN) is the more profitable company, earning 2.

9% net margin versus -6. 0% for Kelly Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 2. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ASGN leads at 6. 5% versus -1. 7% for TBI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ASGN leads at 27. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, ASGN Incorporated (ASGN) trades at 5.

8x forward P/E versus 11. 0x for Kelly Services, Inc. — 5. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ASGN: 79. 4% to $37. 60.

In this comparison, MAN (4.

7% yield), KELYA (3. 2% yield) pay a dividend. TBI, ASGN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Kelly Services, Inc.

(KELYA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 01), 3. 2% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KELYA: -33. 0%, ASGN: -41. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (KELYA (Industrials) and TBI (Industrials) and MAN (Industrials) and ASGN (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: KELYA is a small-cap income-oriented stock; TBI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MAN is a small-cap income-oriented stock; ASGN is a small-cap deep-value stock. KELYA, MAN pay a dividend while TBI, ASGN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.