KEN
Kenon Holdings Ltd.
Independent Power Producers
Market Cap$4.64B
5Y Perf.+333.8%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
KEN vs ITRN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
ITRN
Ituran Location and Control Ltd.
Communication Equipment
Market Cap$1.43B
5Y Perf.+256.1%
KEN vs ITRN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | KEN | ITRN |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Independent Power Producers | Communication Equipment |
| Market Cap | $4.64B | $1.43B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $775M | $359M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $495M | $58M |
| Gross Margin | 17.1% | 49.7% |
| Operating Margin | 5.0% | 21.4% |
| Forward P/E | 7.8x | 18.4x |
| Total Debt | $1.28B | $5M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.02B | $108M |
KEN vs ITRN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
KEN
ITRN
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kenon Holdings Ltd. (KEN) | 100 | 433.8 | +333.8% |
| Ituran Location and… (ITRN) | 100 | 356.1 | +256.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KEN vs ITRN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: KEN leads in 6 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Ituran Location and Control Ltd. is the stronger pick specifically for operational efficiency and capital deployment. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
KEN
Kenon Holdings Ltd.
The Income Pick
KEN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.90, yield 4.3%
- Rev growth 8.6%, EPS growth 356.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 15.5%
- 12.8% 10Y total return vs ITRN's 243.1%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
ITRN
Ituran Location and Control Ltd.
The Niche Pick
ITRN is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.
- 15.8% ROA vs KEN's 11.4%, ROIC 47.2% vs 1.2%
Best for: efficiency
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | KEN | 8.6% revenue growth vs ITRN's 6.8% |
| Value | KEN | Lower P/E (7.8x vs 18.4x) |
| Quality / Margins | KEN | 63.8% margin vs ITRN's 16.1% |
| Stability / Safety | KEN | Beta 0.90 vs ITRN's 1.16 |
| Dividends | KEN | 4.3% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs ITRN's 3.1% |
| Momentum (1Y) | KEN | +198.2% vs ITRN's +78.1% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | ITRN | 15.8% ROA vs KEN's 11.4%, ROIC 47.2% vs 1.2% |
KEN vs ITRN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2021
KEN vs ITRN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLITRNLAGGINGKEN
KENKenon Holdings Ltd.
1leads
ITRNIturan Location and C…
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs KENMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
ITRN4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
ITRN8/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
KEN5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ITRN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KEN is the larger business by revenue, generating $775M annually — 2.2x ITRN's $359M. KEN is the more profitable business, keeping 63.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ITRN's 16.1%. On growth, ITRN holds the edge at +12.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | KENKenon Holdings Lt… | ITRNIturan Location a… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $775M | $359M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $122M | $96M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $495M | $58M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $222M | $71M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +17.1% | +49.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.0% | +21.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +63.8% | +16.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +28.6% | +19.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.3% | +12.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -95.3% | +10.0% |
ITRN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — KEN and ITRN each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.8x trailing earnings, KEN trades at a 62% valuation discount to ITRN's 20.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ITRN's 13.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KEN's 34.8x.
| Metric | KENKenon Holdings Lt… | ITRNIturan Location a… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.6B | $1.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.9B | $1.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 7.84x | 20.87x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 18.44x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.68x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 34.77x | 13.81x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.17x | 3.98x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.76x | 5.39x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 21.41x |
Evenly matched — KEN and ITRN each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ITRN leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ITRN delivers a 27.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $19 for KEN. ITRN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KEN's 0.48x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KEN scores 8/9 vs ITRN's 7/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | KENKenon Holdings Lt… | ITRNIturan Location a… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +19.1% | +27.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +11.4% | +15.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.2% | +47.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.2% | +29.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.48x | 0.02x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $264M | -$103M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.0B | $108M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.3B | $5M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.52x | 32.28x |
ITRN leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KEN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KEN five years ago would be worth $34,896 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $29,311 for ITRN. Over the past 12 months, KEN leads with a +198.2% total return vs ITRN's +78.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KEN at 52.5% vs ITRN's 46.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | KENKenon Holdings Lt… | ITRNIturan Location a… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +37.3% | +46.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +198.2% | +78.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +254.8% | +215.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +249.0% | +193.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1279.4% | +243.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +52.5% | +46.7% |
KEN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KEN and ITRN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KEN is the less volatile stock with a 0.90 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ITRN's 1.16 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ITRN currently trades 99.7% from its 52-week high vs KEN's 92.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | KENKenon Holdings Lt… | ITRNIturan Location a… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.90x | 1.16x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $95.93 | $61.13 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $30.89 | $32.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.7% | +99.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.8 | 68.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 26K | 119K |
Evenly matched — KEN and ITRN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — KEN and ITRN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates KEN as "Hold" and ITRN as "Hold". For income investors, KEN offers the higher dividend yield at 4.28% vs ITRN's 3.10%.
| Metric | KENKenon Holdings Lt… | ITRNIturan Location a… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $56.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.3% | +3.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.80 | $1.89 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | +0.2% |
Evenly matched — KEN and ITRN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
ITRN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). KEN leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
Best OverallIturan Location and Control… (ITRN)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
KEN vs ITRN: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KEN or ITRN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Kenon Holdings Ltd.
(KEN) is the stronger pick with 8. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 8% for Ituran Location and Control Ltd. (ITRN). Kenon Holdings Ltd. (KEN) offers the better valuation at 7. 8x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Kenon Holdings Ltd. (KEN) a "Hold" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KEN or ITRN?
On trailing P/E, Kenon Holdings Ltd.
(KEN) is the cheapest at 7. 8x versus Ituran Location and Control Ltd. at 20. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KEN or ITRN?
Over the past 5 years, Kenon Holdings Ltd.
(KEN) delivered a total return of +249. 0%, compared to +193. 1% for Ituran Location and Control Ltd. (ITRN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KEN returned +1279% versus ITRN's +243. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KEN or ITRN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kenon Holdings Ltd.
(KEN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 90β versus Ituran Location and Control Ltd. 's 1. 16β — meaning ITRN is approximately 29% more volatile than KEN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ituran Location and Control Ltd. (ITRN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 48% for Kenon Holdings Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KEN or ITRN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Kenon Holdings Ltd.
(KEN) is pulling ahead at 8. 6% versus 6. 8% for Ituran Location and Control Ltd. (ITRN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kenon Holdings Ltd. grew EPS 356. 6% year-over-year, compared to 8. 1% for Ituran Location and Control Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, KEN leads at 15. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KEN or ITRN?
Kenon Holdings Ltd.
(KEN) is the more profitable company, earning 79. 6% net margin versus 16. 1% for Ituran Location and Control Ltd. — meaning it keeps 79. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ITRN leads at 21. 4% versus 6. 3% for KEN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ITRN leads at 49. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — KEN or ITRN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Kenon Holdings Ltd. (KEN) offers the highest yield at 4. 3%, versus 3. 1% for Ituran Location and Control Ltd. (ITRN).
08Is KEN or ITRN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Kenon Holdings Ltd.
(KEN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 90), 4. 3% yield, +1279% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KEN: +1279%, ITRN: +243. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between KEN and ITRN?
These companies operate in different sectors (KEN (Utilities) and ITRN (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: KEN is a small-cap deep-value stock; ITRN is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(KEN: 8.3% · ITRN: 12.8%)Net Margin>
%
(KEN: 63.8% · ITRN: 16.1%)P/E Ratio<
x
(KEN: 7.8x · ITRN: 20.9x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.