Independent Power Producers
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
KEN vs ITRN vs GRMN vs AMTD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Communication Equipment
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Asset Management
KEN vs ITRN vs GRMN vs AMTD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Independent Power Producers | Communication Equipment | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $4.64B | $1.43B | $46.30B | $8M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $775M | $359M | $7.46B | $54M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $495M | $58M | $1.74B | $188M |
| Gross Margin | 17.1% | 49.7% | 59.1% | 45.2% |
| Operating Margin | 5.0% | 21.4% | 26.5% | 48.2% |
| Forward P/E | 7.8x | 18.4x | 25.1x | 0.3x |
| Total Debt | $1.28B | $5M | $165M | $283M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.02B | $108M | $2.28B | $63M |
KEN vs ITRN vs GRMN vs AMTD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kenon Holdings Ltd. (KEN) | 100 | 433.8 | +333.8% |
| Ituran Location and… (ITRN) | 100 | 356.1 | +256.1% |
| Garmin Ltd. (GRMN) | 100 | 266.3 | +166.3% |
| AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD) | 100 | 2.7 | -97.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KEN vs ITRN vs GRMN vs AMTD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KEN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 8.6%, EPS growth 356.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 15.5%
- 12.8% 10Y total return vs GRMN's 5.6%
- +198.2% vs AMTD's +6.0%
ITRN is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.60 vs GRMN's 2.35
- 3.1% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs AMTD's 36.4%
GRMN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and efficiency is your priority.
- 15.1% revenue growth vs AMTD's -55.9%
- 16.2% ROA vs AMTD's 10.8%, ROIC 22.0% vs 1.2%
AMTD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.05, yield 36.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.05, Low D/E 16.7%, current ratio 10.62x
- Beta 0.05, yield 36.4%, current ratio 10.62x
- Lower P/E (0.3x vs 25.1x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.1% revenue growth vs AMTD's -55.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.3x vs 25.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 94.4% margin vs ITRN's 16.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.05 vs GRMN's 1.29 | |
| Dividends | 3.1% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs AMTD's 36.4% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +198.2% vs AMTD's +6.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 16.2% ROA vs AMTD's 10.8%, ROIC 22.0% vs 1.2% |
KEN vs ITRN vs GRMN vs AMTD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
KEN vs ITRN vs GRMN vs AMTD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GRMN leads in 1 of 6 categories
AMTD leads 1 • ITRN leads 1 • KEN leads 1 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GRMN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GRMN is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.5B annually — 138.0x AMTD's $54M. AMTD is the more profitable business, keeping 94.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ITRN's 16.1%. On growth, GRMN holds the edge at +14.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $775M | $359M | $7.5B | $54M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $122M | $96M | $2.2B | $263M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $495M | $58M | $1.7B | $188M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $222M | $71M | $1.5B | $45M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +17.1% | +49.7% | +59.1% | +45.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.0% | +21.4% | +26.5% | +48.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +63.8% | +16.1% | +23.3% | +94.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +28.6% | +19.7% | +19.4% | +9.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.3% | +12.8% | +14.2% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -95.3% | +10.0% | +21.5% | -88.3% |
Valuation Metrics
AMTD leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 0.3x trailing earnings, AMTD trades at a 99% valuation discount to GRMN's 27.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ITRN offers better value at 0.68x vs GRMN's 2.62x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.6B | $1.4B | $46.3B | $8M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.9B | $1.3B | $44.2B | $228M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 7.84x | 20.87x | 27.95x | 0.25x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 18.44x | 25.14x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.68x | 2.62x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 34.77x | 13.81x | 21.40x | 6.94x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.17x | 3.98x | 6.39x | 0.14x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.76x | 5.39x | 5.18x | 0.01x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 21.41x | 33.97x | 1.46x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ITRN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ITRN delivers a 27.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $13 for AMTD. GRMN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KEN's 0.48x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KEN scores 8/9 vs AMTD's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +19.1% | +27.3% | +19.9% | +12.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +11.4% | +15.8% | +16.2% | +10.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.2% | +47.2% | +22.0% | +1.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.2% | +29.5% | +21.6% | +1.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.48x | 0.02x | 0.02x | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $264M | -$103M | -$2.1B | $221M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.0B | $108M | $2.3B | $63M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.3B | $5M | $165M | $283M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.52x | 32.28x | — | 17.18x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KEN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KEN five years ago would be worth $34,896 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $254 for AMTD. Over the past 12 months, KEN leads with a +198.2% total return vs AMTD's +6.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KEN at 52.5% vs AMTD's -40.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +37.3% | +46.8% | +19.0% | +3.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +198.2% | +78.1% | +28.0% | +6.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +254.8% | +215.8% | +141.0% | -78.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +249.0% | +193.1% | +79.2% | -97.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1279.4% | +243.1% | +558.6% | -91.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +52.5% | +46.7% | +34.1% | -40.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ITRN and AMTD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AMTD is the less volatile stock with a 0.05 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GRMN's 1.29 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ITRN currently trades 99.7% from its 52-week high vs AMTD's 64.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.90x | 1.16x | 1.29x | 0.05x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $95.93 | $61.13 | $273.32 | $1.65 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $30.89 | $32.71 | $186.67 | $0.87 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.7% | +99.7% | +87.8% | +64.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.8 | 68.5 | 43.5 | 54.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 26K | 119K | 724K | 24K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ITRN and AMTD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: KEN as "Hold", ITRN as "Hold", GRMN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 12.0% upside for GRMN (target: $269) vs -8.1% for ITRN (target: $56). For income investors, AMTD offers the higher dividend yield at 36.35% vs GRMN's 1.43%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $56.00 | $269.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 5 | 28 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.3% | +3.1% | +1.4% | +36.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.80 | $1.89 | $3.43 | $0.39 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | +0.2% | +0.5% | 0.0% |
GRMN leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). AMTD leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
KEN vs ITRN vs GRMN vs AMTD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KEN or ITRN or GRMN or AMTD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Garmin Ltd.
(GRMN) is the stronger pick with 15. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -55. 9% for AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD). AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD) offers the better valuation at 0. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Kenon Holdings Ltd. (KEN) a "Hold" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KEN or ITRN or GRMN or AMTD?
On trailing P/E, AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD) is the cheapest at 0.
3x versus Garmin Ltd. at 27. 9x. On forward P/E, Ituran Location and Control Ltd. is actually cheaper at 18. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Ituran Location and Control Ltd. wins at 0. 60x versus Garmin Ltd. 's 2. 35x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KEN or ITRN or GRMN or AMTD?
Over the past 5 years, Kenon Holdings Ltd.
(KEN) delivered a total return of +249. 0%, compared to -97. 5% for AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KEN returned +1279% versus AMTD's -91. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KEN or ITRN or GRMN or AMTD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
05β versus Garmin Ltd. 's 1. 29β — meaning GRMN is approximately 2318% more volatile than AMTD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Garmin Ltd. (GRMN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 48% for Kenon Holdings Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KEN or ITRN or GRMN or AMTD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Garmin Ltd.
(GRMN) is pulling ahead at 15. 1% versus -55. 9% for AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kenon Holdings Ltd. grew EPS 356. 6% year-over-year, compared to -68. 5% for AMTD IDEA Group. Over a 3-year CAGR, KEN leads at 15. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KEN or ITRN or GRMN or AMTD?
AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD) is the more profitable company, earning 94.
4% net margin versus 16. 1% for Ituran Location and Control Ltd. — meaning it keeps 94. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMTD leads at 48. 2% versus 6. 3% for KEN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GRMN leads at 58. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KEN or ITRN or GRMN or AMTD more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Ituran Location and Control Ltd. (ITRN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 60x versus Garmin Ltd. 's 2. 35x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Ituran Location and Control Ltd. (ITRN) trades at 18. 4x forward P/E versus 25. 1x for Garmin Ltd. — 6. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GRMN: 12. 0% to $269. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — KEN or ITRN or GRMN or AMTD?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD) offers the highest yield at 36. 4%, versus 1. 4% for Garmin Ltd. (GRMN).
09Is KEN or ITRN or GRMN or AMTD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Kenon Holdings Ltd.
(KEN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 90), 4. 3% yield, +1279% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KEN: +1279%, ITRN: +243. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KEN and ITRN and GRMN and AMTD?
These companies operate in different sectors (KEN (Utilities) and ITRN (Technology) and GRMN (Technology) and AMTD (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: KEN is a small-cap deep-value stock; ITRN is a small-cap income-oriented stock; GRMN is a mid-cap high-growth stock; AMTD is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.