KEX vs TK vs MATX vs SBLK vs ZIM

For growth investors, Kirby Corporation (KEX) is the stronger pick with 3.

0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -18. 1% for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM). ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM) offers the better valuation at 6. 6x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Kirby Corporation (KEX) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.

(ZIM) is the cheapest at 6. 6x versus Star Bulk Carriers Corp. at 36. 7x. On forward P/E, Star Bulk Carriers Corp. is actually cheaper at 8. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Star Bulk Carriers Corp. wins at 0. 16x versus Matson, Inc. 's 0. 52x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Teekay Corporation (TK) delivered a total return of +412.

3%, compared to +79. 1% for Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SBLK returned +977. 3% versus TK's +97. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Teekay Corporation (TK) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

38β versus Matson, Inc. 's 1. 76β — meaning MATX is approximately 362% more volatile than TK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Teekay Corporation (TK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 143% for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Kirby Corporation (KEX) is pulling ahead at 3.

0% versus -18. 1% for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kirby Corporation grew EPS 28. 9% year-over-year, compared to -77. 7% for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TK leads at 21. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Matson, Inc.

(MATX) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 3% net margin versus 6. 9% for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. — meaning it keeps 13. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TK leads at 29. 9% versus 12. 2% for ZIM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TK leads at 32. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 16x versus Matson, Inc. 's 0. 52x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK) trades at 8. 0x forward P/E versus 64. 0x for Teekay Corporation — 56. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SBLK: 8. 2% to $29. 00.

In this comparison, ZIM (16.

4% yield), TK (6. 5% yield), SBLK (1. 1% yield), MATX (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. KEX does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Star Bulk Carriers Corp.

(SBLK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 73), 1. 1% yield, +977. 3% 10Y return). Matson, Inc. (MATX) carries a higher beta of 1. 76 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SBLK: +977. 3%, MATX: +476. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (KEX (Industrials) and TK (Energy) and MATX (Industrials) and SBLK (Industrials) and ZIM (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: KEX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TK is a small-cap deep-value stock; MATX is a small-cap deep-value stock; SBLK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ZIM is a small-cap deep-value stock. TK, MATX, SBLK, ZIM pay a dividend while KEX does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.