Staffing & Employment Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
KFY vs DHX vs MAN vs HURN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Staffing & Employment Services
Staffing & Employment Services
Consulting Services
KFY vs DHX vs MAN vs HURN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Staffing & Employment Services | Staffing & Employment Services | Staffing & Employment Services | Consulting Services |
| Market Cap | $3.45B | $138M | $1.41B | $2.02B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.89B | $125M | $17.96B | $1.74B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $269M | $-2M | $-13M | $104M |
| Gross Margin | 26.1% | 84.8% | 16.7% | 23.3% |
| Operating Margin | 13.2% | 0.5% | 0.8% | 11.3% |
| Forward P/E | 12.7x | 21.6x | 8.1x | 13.6x |
| Total Debt | $571M | $47M | $2.39B | $548M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.01B | $3M | $871M | $25M |
KFY vs DHX vs MAN vs HURN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Korn Ferry (KFY) | 100 | 224.0 | +124.0% |
| DHI Group, Inc. (DHX) | 100 | 131.5 | +31.5% |
| ManpowerGroup Inc. (MAN) | 100 | 43.2 | -56.8% |
| Huron Consulting Gr… (HURN) | 100 | 259.3 | +159.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KFY vs DHX vs MAN vs HURN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KFY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.85, yield 2.4%
- 169.9% 10Y total return vs HURN's 116.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.85, Low D/E 30.5%, current ratio 1.83x
- Beta 0.85, yield 2.4%, current ratio 1.83x
DHX is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +134.6% vs HURN's -17.2%
MAN is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (8.1x vs 13.6x)
HURN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 14.3%, EPS growth -6.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.5%
- 14.3% revenue growth vs DHX's -9.9%
- Beta 0.82 vs DHX's 1.11
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.3% revenue growth vs DHX's -9.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.1x vs 13.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.3% margin vs DHX's -1.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.82 vs DHX's 1.11 | |
| Dividends | 2.4% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs MAN's 4.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +134.6% vs HURN's -17.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.1% ROA vs DHX's -1.1%, ROIC 18.5% vs -5.9% |
KFY vs DHX vs MAN vs HURN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
KFY vs DHX vs MAN vs HURN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DHX leads in 1 of 6 categories
MAN leads 1 • KFY leads 1 • HURN leads 1 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DHX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MAN is the larger business by revenue, generating $18.0B annually — 143.4x DHX's $125M. KFY is the more profitable business, keeping 9.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DHX's -1.8%. On growth, HURN holds the edge at +14.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.9B | $125M | $18.0B | $1.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $479M | $11M | $236M | $231M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $269M | -$2M | -$13M | $104M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $288M | $20M | -$161M | $124M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +26.1% | +84.8% | +16.7% | +23.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +13.2% | +0.5% | +0.8% | +11.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.3% | -1.8% | -0.1% | +6.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.0% | +16.3% | -0.9% | +7.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.2% | -8.1% | +7.1% | +14.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.8% | +119.0% | +36.2% | +0.8% |
Valuation Metrics
MAN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.6x trailing earnings, KFY trades at a 32% valuation discount to HURN's 21.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, KFY's 7.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DHX's 56.6x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.5B | $138M | $1.4B | $2.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.0B | $181M | $2.9B | $2.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.58x | -10.63x | -104.90x | 21.37x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.73x | 21.60x | 8.12x | 13.57x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.75x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.07x | 56.64x | 9.02x | 10.99x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.25x | 1.08x | 0.08x | 1.19x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.89x | 1.51x | 0.69x | 4.25x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.44x | 9.99x | — | 11.06x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KFY leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HURN delivers a 21.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $-2 for DHX. KFY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.31x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MAN's 1.16x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KFY scores 7/9 vs MAN's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.9% | -2.3% | -0.6% | +21.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.1% | -1.1% | -0.1% | +6.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +18.5% | -5.9% | +5.6% | +15.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.3% | -7.8% | +6.2% | +18.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.31x | 0.49x | 1.16x | 1.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$436M | $44M | $1.5B | $524M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.0B | $3M | $871M | $25M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $571M | $47M | $2.4B | $548M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 18.94x | 0.04x | 1.98x | 7.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HURN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HURN five years ago would be worth $22,023 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,514 for MAN. Over the past 12 months, DHX leads with a +134.6% total return vs HURN's -17.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HURN at 17.6% vs MAN's -18.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.9% | +95.7% | +1.2% | -27.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +7.3% | +134.6% | -17.0% | -17.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +51.8% | -6.2% | -46.4% | +62.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +8.1% | +2.9% | -64.9% | +120.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +169.9% | -55.1% | -30.8% | +116.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.9% | -2.1% | -18.8% | +17.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — DHX and HURN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HURN is the less volatile stock with a 0.82 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DHX's 1.11 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DHX currently trades 95.5% from its 52-week high vs MAN's 64.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.81x | 1.05x | 0.89x | 0.68x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $78.50 | $3.34 | $47.34 | $186.78 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $58.95 | $1.25 | $25.15 | $112.45 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +85.5% | +95.5% | +64.3% | +66.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.2 | 54.2 | 47.1 | 37.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 508K | 251K | 1.1M | 243K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — KFY and MAN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: KFY as "Buy", DHX as "Hold", MAN as "Hold", HURN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 60.3% upside for HURN (target: $200) vs -6.0% for DHX (target: $3). For income investors, MAN offers the higher dividend yield at 4.71% vs KFY's 2.36%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $70.00 | $3.00 | $37.86 | $200.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 11 | 29 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.4% | — | +4.7% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.58 | — | $1.43 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.6% | +8.2% | +2.7% | +8.2% |
DHX leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). MAN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
KFY vs DHX vs MAN vs HURN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KFY or DHX or MAN or HURN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Huron Consulting Group Inc.
(HURN) is the stronger pick with 14. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 9% for DHI Group, Inc. (DHX). Korn Ferry (KFY) offers the better valuation at 14. 6x trailing P/E (12. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Korn Ferry (KFY) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KFY or DHX or MAN or HURN?
On trailing P/E, Korn Ferry (KFY) is the cheapest at 14.
6x versus Huron Consulting Group Inc. at 21. 4x. On forward P/E, ManpowerGroup Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KFY or DHX or MAN or HURN?
Over the past 5 years, Huron Consulting Group Inc.
(HURN) delivered a total return of +120. 2%, compared to -64. 9% for ManpowerGroup Inc. (MAN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KFY returned +172. 4% versus DHX's -50. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KFY or DHX or MAN or HURN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Huron Consulting Group Inc.
(HURN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 68β versus DHI Group, Inc. 's 1. 05β — meaning DHX is approximately 54% more volatile than HURN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Korn Ferry (KFY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 31% versus 116% for ManpowerGroup Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KFY or DHX or MAN or HURN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Huron Consulting Group Inc.
(HURN) is pulling ahead at 14. 3% versus -9. 9% for DHI Group, Inc. (DHX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Korn Ferry grew EPS 42. 4% year-over-year, compared to -109. 6% for ManpowerGroup Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HURN leads at 14. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KFY or DHX or MAN or HURN?
Korn Ferry (KFY) is the more profitable company, earning 8.
9% net margin versus -10. 6% for DHI Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KFY leads at 12. 5% versus -8. 9% for DHX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DHX leads at 84. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KFY or DHX or MAN or HURN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, ManpowerGroup Inc.
(MAN) trades at 8. 1x forward P/E versus 21. 6x for DHI Group, Inc. — 13. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HURN: 60. 3% to $200. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — KFY or DHX or MAN or HURN?
In this comparison, MAN (4.
7% yield), KFY (2. 4% yield) pay a dividend. DHX, HURN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is KFY or DHX or MAN or HURN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Korn Ferry (KFY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
81), 2. 4% yield, +172. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KFY: +172. 4%, DHX: -50. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KFY and DHX and MAN and HURN?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: KFY is a small-cap deep-value stock; DHX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MAN is a small-cap income-oriented stock; HURN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. KFY, MAN pay a dividend while DHX, HURN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.