Gold
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
KGC vs CAT vs DE vs NEM vs AEM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Agricultural - Machinery
Agricultural - Machinery
Gold
Gold
KGC vs CAT vs DE vs NEM vs AEM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Gold | Agricultural - Machinery | Agricultural - Machinery | Gold | Gold |
| Market Cap | $36.43B | $416.75B | $157.32B | $125.72B | $94.03B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7.94B | $70.75B | $45.88B | $17.23B | $11.87B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2.86B | $9.42B | $4.08B | $5.26B | $4.45B |
| Gross Margin | 52.8% | 32.5% | 34.7% | 52.1% | 57.3% |
| Operating Margin | 48.2% | 16.6% | 17.0% | 49.3% | 52.9% |
| Forward P/E | 9.7x | 38.8x | 32.5x | 10.9x | 13.5x |
| Total Debt | $777M | $43.33B | $63.94B | $474M | $321M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.75B | $9.98B | $8.28B | $7.65B | $2.87B |
KGC vs CAT vs DE vs NEM vs AEM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kinross Gold Corpor… (KGC) | 100 | 464.4 | +364.4% |
| Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) | 100 | 745.6 | +645.6% |
| Deere & Company (DE) | 100 | 381.5 | +281.5% |
| Newmont Corporation (NEM) | 100 | 194.1 | +94.1% |
| Agnico Eagle Mines … (AEM) | 100 | 293.3 | +193.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KGC vs CAT vs DE vs NEM vs AEM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KGC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and efficiency is your priority.
- Lower P/E (9.7x vs 10.9x), PEG 0.78 vs 0.85
- 23.4% ROA vs DE's 3.9%, ROIC 29.9% vs 7.7%
CAT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 12.3% 10Y total return vs KGC's 499.1%
- +181.5% vs DE's +24.2%
DE is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.56, yield 1.1%
- Beta 0.56, yield 1.1%, current ratio 2.31x
- 1.1% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs KGC's 0.4%
Among these 5 stocks, NEM doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
AEM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 43.7%, EPS growth 134.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 29.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.52, Low D/E 1.3%, current ratio 2.02x
- PEG 0.40 vs DE's 1.99
- 43.7% revenue growth vs DE's -2.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 43.7% revenue growth vs DE's -2.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.7x vs 10.9x), PEG 0.78 vs 0.85 | |
| Quality / Margins | 37.5% margin vs DE's 8.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.52 vs CAT's 1.54, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs KGC's 0.4% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +181.5% vs DE's +24.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 23.4% ROA vs DE's 3.9%, ROIC 29.9% vs 7.7% |
KGC vs CAT vs DE vs NEM vs AEM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
KGC vs CAT vs DE vs NEM vs AEM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KGC leads in 2 of 6 categories
AEM leads 1 • DE leads 1 • CAT leads 0 • NEM leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AEM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CAT is the larger business by revenue, generating $70.8B annually — 8.9x KGC's $7.9B. AEM is the more profitable business, keeping 37.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DE's 8.9%. On growth, AEM holds the edge at +64.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7.9B | $70.8B | $45.9B | $17.2B | $11.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $5.0B | $14.0B | $9.5B | $12.7B | $7.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2.9B | $9.4B | $4.1B | $5.3B | $4.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3.0B | $11.4B | $5.5B | $12.9B | $4.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +52.8% | +32.5% | +34.7% | +52.1% | +57.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +48.2% | +16.6% | +17.0% | +49.3% | +52.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +36.0% | +13.3% | +8.9% | +30.5% | +37.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +38.0% | +16.2% | +12.0% | +75.0% | +37.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +58.6% | +22.2% | +16.3% | -100.0% | +64.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +130.0% | +30.2% | -24.1% | -100.0% | +199.0% |
Valuation Metrics
KGC leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.3x trailing earnings, KGC trades at a 68% valuation discount to CAT's 47.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AEM offers better value at 0.63x vs DE's 1.92x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $36.4B | $416.8B | $157.3B | $125.7B | $94.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $35.5B | $450.1B | $213.0B | $118.6B | $91.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.29x | 47.57x | 31.37x | 17.70x | 21.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.72x | 38.79x | 32.53x | 10.89x | 13.47x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.23x | 1.69x | 1.92x | 1.38x | 0.63x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.30x | 33.41x | 20.01x | 9.03x | 11.47x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.08x | 6.17x | 3.52x | 5.69x | 7.90x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.29x | 19.71x | 6.06x | 3.69x | 3.82x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 14.18x | 40.56x | 48.69x | 17.22x | 22.06x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KGC leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CAT delivers a 47.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $48 in annual profit, vs $15 for DE. AEM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DE's 2.46x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KGC scores 9/9 vs DE's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +33.9% | +47.5% | +15.5% | +15.6% | +19.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +23.4% | +10.0% | +3.9% | +9.4% | +13.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +29.9% | +15.9% | +7.7% | +24.9% | +21.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +29.8% | +19.1% | +11.4% | +20.7% | +20.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 9 | 5 | 5 | 9 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.09x | 2.03x | 2.46x | 0.01x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$975M | $33.4B | $55.7B | -$7.2B | -$2.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.8B | $10.0B | $8.3B | $7.6B | $2.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $777M | $43.3B | $63.9B | $474M | $321M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 58.61x | 9.22x | 2.74x | 50.54x | 73.32x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — KGC and CAT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KGC five years ago would be worth $40,136 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $15,406 for DE. Over the past 12 months, CAT leads with a +181.5% total return vs DE's +24.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KGC at 79.7% vs DE's 16.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +7.6% | +50.2% | +24.7% | +12.4% | +10.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +95.7% | +181.5% | +24.2% | +112.0% | +61.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +480.5% | +324.9% | +57.4% | +142.1% | +224.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +301.4% | +282.5% | +54.1% | +80.0% | +183.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +499.1% | +1227.6% | +671.0% | +293.1% | +351.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +79.7% | +62.0% | +16.3% | +34.3% | +48.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CAT and AEM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AEM is the less volatile stock with a 0.52 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CAT's 1.54 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CAT currently trades 96.2% from its 52-week high vs AEM's 73.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.69x | 1.54x | 0.56x | 0.75x | 0.52x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $39.11 | $931.35 | $674.19 | $134.88 | $255.24 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.28 | $318.11 | $433.00 | $48.27 | $103.38 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +77.8% | +96.2% | +86.1% | +84.1% | +73.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.5 | 76.2 | 54.0 | 53.5 | 43.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 8.9M | 2.4M | 1.2M | 9.2M | 2.5M |
Analyst Outlook
DE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: KGC as "Buy", CAT as "Buy", DE as "Hold", NEM as "Buy", AEM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 38.9% upside for KGC (target: $42) vs -7.9% for CAT (target: $825). For income investors, DE offers the higher dividend yield at 1.09% vs KGC's 0.42%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $42.25 | $824.80 | $680.54 | $137.50 | $237.71 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 28 | 53 | 46 | 36 | 31 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.4% | +0.7% | +1.1% | +0.9% | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 8 | 8 | 1 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.13 | $5.86 | $6.33 | $1.00 | $1.45 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.7% | +1.2% | +0.7% | +1.8% | +0.7% |
KGC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). AEM leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
KGC vs CAT vs DE vs NEM vs AEM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KGC or CAT or DE or NEM or AEM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) is the stronger pick with 43.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 2% for Deere & Company (DE). Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) offers the better valuation at 15. 3x trailing P/E (9. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KGC or CAT or DE or NEM or AEM?
On trailing P/E, Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) is the cheapest at 15.
3x versus Caterpillar Inc. at 47. 6x. On forward P/E, Kinross Gold Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Agnico Eagle Mines Limited wins at 0. 40x versus Deere & Company's 1. 99x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KGC or CAT or DE or NEM or AEM?
Over the past 5 years, Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) delivered a total return of +301.
4%, compared to +54. 1% for Deere & Company (DE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CAT returned +1228% versus NEM's +293. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KGC or CAT or DE or NEM or AEM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
52β versus Caterpillar Inc. 's 1. 54β — meaning CAT is approximately 194% more volatile than AEM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 2% for Deere & Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KGC or CAT or DE or NEM or AEM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) is pulling ahead at 43.
7% versus -2. 2% for Deere & Company (DE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kinross Gold Corporation grew EPS 158. 4% year-over-year, compared to -14. 6% for Caterpillar Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AEM leads at 29. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KGC or CAT or DE or NEM or AEM?
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) is the more profitable company, earning 37.
5% net margin versus 11. 3% for Deere & Company — meaning it keeps 37. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AEM leads at 53. 1% versus 16. 6% for CAT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AEM leads at 58. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KGC or CAT or DE or NEM or AEM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 40x versus Deere & Company's 1. 99x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) trades at 9. 7x forward P/E versus 38. 8x for Caterpillar Inc. — 29. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KGC: 38. 9% to $42. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — KGC or CAT or DE or NEM or AEM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Deere & Company (DE) offers the highest yield at 1. 1%, versus 0. 4% for Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC).
09Is KGC or CAT or DE or NEM or AEM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Deere & Company (DE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
56), 1. 1% yield, +671. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (DE: +671. 0%, KGC: +499. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KGC and CAT and DE and NEM and AEM?
These companies operate in different sectors (KGC (Basic Materials) and CAT (Industrials) and DE (Industrials) and NEM (Basic Materials) and AEM (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: KGC is a mid-cap high-growth stock; CAT is a large-cap quality compounder stock; DE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; NEM is a mid-cap high-growth stock; AEM is a mid-cap high-growth stock. CAT, DE, NEM, AEM pay a dividend while KGC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.