Education & Training Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
KIDZW vs CHGG vs PRDO vs LRN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Education & Training Services
Education & Training Services
Education & Training Services
KIDZW vs CHGG vs PRDO vs LRN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Education & Training Services | Education & Training Services | Education & Training Services | Education & Training Services |
| Market Cap | $1.00 | $143M | $2.16B | $3.90B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4M | $319M | $855M | $2.54B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-2M | $-86M | $170M | $308M |
| Gross Margin | 55.3% | 61.9% | 51.8% | 38.3% |
| Operating Margin | -79.0% | -11.1% | 24.3% | 15.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 12.6x | 12.5x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $84M | $105M | $550M |
| Cash & Equiv. | — | $31M | $132M | $782M |
KIDZW vs CHGG vs PRDO vs LRN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Classover Holdings,… (KIDZW) | 100 | 35.1 | -64.9% |
| Chegg, Inc. (CHGG) | 100 | 159.5 | +59.5% |
| Perdoceo Education … (PRDO) | 100 | 143.5 | +43.5% |
| Stride, Inc. (LRN) | 100 | 61.8 | -38.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KIDZW vs CHGG vs PRDO vs LRN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KIDZW lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
CHGG is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +79.3% vs KIDZW's -92.6%
PRDO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.48, yield 1.6%
- 24.2% revenue growth vs KIDZW's -100.0%
- 19.9% margin vs KIDZW's -53.2%
- 1.6% yield; 5-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
LRN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 17.9%, EPS growth 26.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.6%
- 6.7% 10Y total return vs PRDO's 5.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.46, Low D/E 37.2%, current ratio 5.39x
- PEG 0.21 vs PRDO's 1.85
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 24.2% revenue growth vs KIDZW's -100.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 19.9% margin vs KIDZW's -53.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.46 vs CHGG's 2.97, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.6% yield; 5-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +79.3% vs KIDZW's -92.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.2% ROA vs CHGG's -26.3%, ROIC 15.3% vs -13.4% |
KIDZW vs CHGG vs PRDO vs LRN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
KIDZW vs CHGG vs PRDO vs LRN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PRDO leads in 3 of 6 categories
LRN leads 2 • KIDZW leads 0 • CHGG leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PRDO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LRN is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.5B annually — 685.3x KIDZW's $4M. PRDO is the more profitable business, keeping 19.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KIDZW's -53.2%. On growth, KIDZW holds the edge at +31.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4M | $319M | $855M | $2.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2M | $11M | $247M | $525M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$2M | -$86M | $170M | $308M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4M | -$25M | $221M | $400M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.3% | +61.9% | +51.8% | +38.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -79.0% | -11.1% | +24.3% | +15.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -53.2% | -26.9% | +19.9% | +12.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -94.8% | -8.0% | +25.8% | +15.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +31.5% | -47.9% | +4.1% | +2.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +101.2% | +30.8% | -7.4% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — CHGG and LRN each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.2x trailing earnings, PRDO trades at a 8% valuation discount to LRN's 15.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), LRN offers better value at 0.26x vs PRDO's 2.09x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1 | $143M | $2.2B | $3.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1 | $196M | $2.1B | $3.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.01x | -1.33x | 14.23x | 15.41x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 12.60x | 12.48x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 2.09x | 0.26x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 12.82x | 8.97x | 7.73x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 0.38x | 2.55x | 1.62x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 1.15x | 2.34x | 3.00x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 9.97x | 10.47x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LRN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LRN delivers a 19.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $-63 for CHGG. PRDO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CHGG's 0.70x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PRDO scores 7/9 vs KIDZW's 0/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -36.5% | -62.9% | +17.2% | +19.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -8.7% | -26.3% | +13.2% | +13.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -13.4% | +15.3% | +22.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | -26.5% | +17.5% | +19.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 0 | 6 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.70x | 0.11x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $0 | $53M | -$27M | -$233M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | — | $31M | $132M | $782M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $84M | $105M | $550M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.46x | -525.53x | 50.21x | 36.09x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LRN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LRN five years ago would be worth $32,308 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $150 for CHGG. Over the past 12 months, CHGG leads with a +79.3% total return vs KIDZW's -92.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRDO at 43.5% vs CHGG's -49.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +10.8% | +30.6% | +18.9% | +41.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -92.6% | +79.3% | +15.4% | -42.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | -87.3% | +195.8% | +122.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | -98.5% | +198.5% | +223.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | -70.8% | +505.6% | +666.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | — | -49.8% | +43.5% | +30.5% |
Risk & Volatility
PRDO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LRN is the less volatile stock with a 0.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CHGG's 2.97 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PRDO currently trades 89.5% from its 52-week high vs KIDZW's 3.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.69x | 2.83x | 0.30x | 0.40x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $0.38 | $1.90 | $38.50 | $171.17 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.01 | $0.53 | $26.66 | $60.61 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +3.5% | +67.4% | +89.5% | +53.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.3 | 63.3 | 46.2 | 49.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 99K | 1.3M | 584K | 744K |
Analyst Outlook
PRDO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CHGG as "Hold", PRDO as "Hold", LRN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 2276.6% upside for CHGG (target: $30) vs 19.4% for LRN (target: $110). PRDO is the only dividend payer here at 1.62% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $30.42 | $44.00 | $109.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 22 | 9 | 17 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.6% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 5 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.56 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +5.6% | +0.5% |
PRDO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). LRN leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
KIDZW vs CHGG vs PRDO vs LRN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KIDZW or CHGG or PRDO or LRN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) is the stronger pick with 24.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Classover Holdings, Inc. Warrants (KIDZW). Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) offers the better valuation at 14. 2x trailing P/E (12. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Chegg, Inc. (CHGG) a "Hold" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KIDZW or CHGG or PRDO or LRN?
On trailing P/E, Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) is the cheapest at 14.
2x versus Stride, Inc. at 15. 4x. On forward P/E, Stride, Inc. is actually cheaper at 12. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Stride, Inc. wins at 0. 21x versus Perdoceo Education Corporation's 1. 85x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KIDZW or CHGG or PRDO or LRN?
Over the past 5 years, Stride, Inc.
(LRN) delivered a total return of +223. 1%, compared to -98. 5% for Chegg, Inc. (CHGG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LRN returned +634. 6% versus CHGG's -73. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KIDZW or CHGG or PRDO or LRN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
30β versus Chegg, Inc. 's 2. 83β — meaning CHGG is approximately 852% more volatile than PRDO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 70% for Chegg, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KIDZW or CHGG or PRDO or LRN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) is pulling ahead at 24.
2% versus -100. 0% for Classover Holdings, Inc. Warrants (KIDZW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Chegg, Inc. grew EPS 88. 1% year-over-year, compared to 10. 5% for Perdoceo Education Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, LRN leads at 12. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KIDZW or CHGG or PRDO or LRN?
Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) is the more profitable company, earning 18.
9% net margin versus -53. 2% for Classover Holdings, Inc. Warrants — meaning it keeps 18. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PRDO leads at 23. 2% versus -79. 0% for KIDZW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PRDO leads at 71. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KIDZW or CHGG or PRDO or LRN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Stride, Inc. (LRN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 21x versus Perdoceo Education Corporation's 1. 85x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Stride, Inc. (LRN) trades at 12. 5x forward P/E versus 12. 6x for Perdoceo Education Corporation — 0. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CHGG: 2276. 6% to $30. 42.
08Which pays a better dividend — KIDZW or CHGG or PRDO or LRN?
In this comparison, PRDO (1.
6% yield) pays a dividend. KIDZW, CHGG, LRN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is KIDZW or CHGG or PRDO or LRN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
30), 1. 6% yield, +532. 6% 10Y return). Chegg, Inc. (CHGG) carries a higher beta of 2. 83 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PRDO: +532. 6%, CHGG: -73. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KIDZW and CHGG and PRDO and LRN?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: KIDZW is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CHGG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRDO is a small-cap high-growth stock; LRN is a small-cap high-growth stock. PRDO pays a dividend while KIDZW, CHGG, LRN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.