KIDZW
Classover Holdings, Inc. Warrants
Education & Training Services
Market Cap$1.00
5Y Perf.-73.3%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
KIDZW vs COE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
COE
51Talk Online Education Group
Software - Application
Market Cap$2M
5Y Perf.+38.0%
KIDZW vs COE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | KIDZW | COE |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Education & Training Services | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $1.00 | $2M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4M | $81M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-2M | $-11M |
| Gross Margin | 55.3% | 75.3% |
| Operating Margin | -79.0% | -11.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | 446.1x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $3M |
| Cash & Equiv. | — | $28M |
KIDZW vs COE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
KIDZW
COE
| Stock | Apr 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Classover Holdings,… (KIDZW) | 100 | 26.7 | -73.3% |
| 51Talk Online Educa… (COE) | 100 | 138.0 | +38.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KIDZW vs COE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: COE leads in 4 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Classover Holdings, Inc. Warrants is the stronger pick specifically for operational efficiency and capital deployment. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
KIDZW
Classover Holdings, Inc. Warrants
The Niche Pick
KIDZW is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.
- -8.7% ROA vs COE's -21.0%
Best for: efficiency
COE
51Talk Online Education Group
The Income Pick
COE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.01
- Rev growth 87.0%, EPS growth 50.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 300.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.01, current ratio 0.70x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | COE | 87.0% revenue growth vs KIDZW's -100.0% |
| Quality / Margins | COE | -13.4% margin vs KIDZW's -53.2% |
| Stability / Safety | COE | Beta 1.01 vs KIDZW's 2.64 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | COE | +31.5% vs KIDZW's -92.6% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | KIDZW | -8.7% ROA vs COE's -21.0% |
KIDZW vs COE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2021
KIDZW vs COE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLCOELAGGINGKIDZW
KIDZWClassover Holdings, I…
0leads
COE51Talk Online Educati…
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs KIDZWMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
COE4/4
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
COE1/1
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
Tied
—
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
Tied
—
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
COE2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
COE leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
COE is the larger business by revenue, generating $81M annually — 22.0x KIDZW's $4M. COE is the more profitable business, keeping -13.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KIDZW's -53.2%.
| Metric | KIDZWClassover Holding… | COE51Talk Online Edu… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4M | $81M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2M | -$9M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$2M | -$11M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4M | $0 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.3% | +75.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -79.0% | -11.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -53.2% | -13.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -94.8% | +10.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +31.5% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
COE leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
COE leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | KIDZWClassover Holding… | COE51Talk Online Edu… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1 | $2M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1 | -$23M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.01x | -0.35x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 446.11x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 0.05x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 0.44x |
COE leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — KIDZW and COE each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), COE scores 5/9 vs KIDZW's 0/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | KIDZWClassover Holding… | COE51Talk Online Edu… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -36.5% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -8.7% | -21.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | — |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 0 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $0 | -$25M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | — | $28M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $3M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.46x | — |
Evenly matched — KIDZW and COE each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — KIDZW and COE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Over the past 12 months, COE leads with a +31.5% total return vs KIDZW's -92.6%.
| Metric | KIDZWClassover Holding… | COE51Talk Online Edu… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +10.8% | -19.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -92.6% | +31.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | +313.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | -67.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | -66.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | — | +60.6% |
Evenly matched — KIDZW and COE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
COE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
COE is the less volatile stock with a 1.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KIDZW's 2.64 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. COE currently trades 45.0% from its 52-week high vs KIDZW's 3.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | KIDZWClassover Holding… | COE51Talk Online Edu… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.64x | 1.01x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $0.38 | $56.13 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.01 | $15.32 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +3.5% | +45.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.3 | 53.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 99K | 9K |
COE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | KIDZWClassover Holding… | COE51Talk Online Edu… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 2 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
COE leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 2 categories are tied.
Best Overall51Talk Online Education Gro… (COE)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
KIDZW vs COE: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KIDZW or COE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, 51Talk Online Education Group (COE) is the stronger pick with 87.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Classover Holdings, Inc. Warrants (KIDZW). Analysts rate 51Talk Online Education Group (COE) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is safer — KIDZW or COE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), 51Talk Online Education Group (COE) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
01β versus Classover Holdings, Inc. Warrants's 2. 64β — meaning KIDZW is approximately 163% more volatile than COE relative to the S&P 500.
03Which is growing faster — KIDZW or COE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), 51Talk Online Education Group (COE) is pulling ahead at 87.
0% versus -100. 0% for Classover Holdings, Inc. Warrants (KIDZW). Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
04Which has better profit margins — KIDZW or COE?
51Talk Online Education Group (COE) is the more profitable company, earning -14.
3% net margin versus -53. 2% for Classover Holdings, Inc. Warrants — meaning it keeps -14. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: COE leads at -15. 9% versus -79. 0% for KIDZW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — COE leads at 78. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — KIDZW or COE?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
06Is KIDZW or COE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, 51Talk Online Education Group (COE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
01)). Classover Holdings, Inc. Warrants (KIDZW) carries a higher beta of 2. 64 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between KIDZW and COE?
These companies operate in different sectors (KIDZW (Consumer Defensive) and COE (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: KIDZW is a small-cap quality compounder stock; COE is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(KIDZW: 31.5% · COE: 87.0%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.