Education & Training Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
KIDZW vs DUOL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
KIDZW vs DUOL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Education & Training Services | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $1.00 | $5.29B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4M | $1.10B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-2M | $422M |
| Gross Margin | 55.3% | 72.7% |
| Operating Margin | -79.0% | 14.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | 38.4x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $94M |
| Cash & Equiv. | — | $1.04B |
KIDZW vs DUOL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Classover Holdings,… (KIDZW) | 100 | 26.7 | -73.3% |
| Duolingo, Inc. (DUOL) | 100 | 29.2 | -70.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KIDZW vs DUOL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
In this particular matchup, KIDZW is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
DUOL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.20
- Rev growth 38.7%, EPS growth 355.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 41.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.20, Low D/E 7.0%, current ratio 2.61x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 38.7% revenue growth vs KIDZW's -100.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 38.4% margin vs KIDZW's -53.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.20 vs KIDZW's 2.64 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -77.1% vs KIDZW's -92.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 22.6% ROA vs KIDZW's -8.7% |
KIDZW vs DUOL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
KIDZW vs DUOL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DUOL leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DUOL is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.1B annually — 297.0x KIDZW's $4M. DUOL is the more profitable business, keeping 38.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KIDZW's -53.2%. On growth, KIDZW holds the edge at +31.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4M | $1.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2M | $167M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$2M | $422M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4M | $423M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.3% | +72.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -79.0% | +14.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -53.2% | +38.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -94.8% | +38.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +31.5% | +26.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +29.2% |
Valuation Metrics
KIDZW leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1 | $5.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1 | $4.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.01x | 13.26x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 38.44x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 29.01x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 5.10x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 4.07x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 14.32x |
Profitability & Efficiency
DUOL leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DUOL delivers a 33.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $34 in annual profit, vs $-36 for KIDZW. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DUOL scores 4/9 vs KIDZW's 0/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -36.5% | +33.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -8.7% | +22.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +40.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +7.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 0 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $0 | -$943M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | — | $1.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $94M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.46x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — KIDZW and DUOL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Over the past 12 months, DUOL leads with a -77.1% total return vs KIDZW's -92.6%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +10.8% | -35.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -92.6% | -77.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | -13.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | -18.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | -18.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | — | -4.8% |
Risk & Volatility
DUOL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DUOL is the less volatile stock with a 1.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KIDZW's 2.64 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DUOL currently trades 20.8% from its 52-week high vs KIDZW's 3.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.64x | 1.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $0.38 | $544.93 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.01 | $87.89 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +3.5% | +20.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.3 | 52.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 99K | 2.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $220.56 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
DUOL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). KIDZW leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
KIDZW vs DUOL: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KIDZW or DUOL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Duolingo, Inc.
(DUOL) is the stronger pick with 38. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Classover Holdings, Inc. Warrants (KIDZW). Duolingo, Inc. (DUOL) offers the better valuation at 13. 3x trailing P/E (38. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Duolingo, Inc. (DUOL) a "Hold" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is safer — KIDZW or DUOL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Duolingo, Inc.
(DUOL) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 20β versus Classover Holdings, Inc. Warrants's 2. 64β — meaning KIDZW is approximately 120% more volatile than DUOL relative to the S&P 500.
03Which is growing faster — KIDZW or DUOL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Duolingo, Inc.
(DUOL) is pulling ahead at 38. 7% versus -100. 0% for Classover Holdings, Inc. Warrants (KIDZW). Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
04Which has better profit margins — KIDZW or DUOL?
Duolingo, Inc.
(DUOL) is the more profitable company, earning 39. 9% net margin versus -53. 2% for Classover Holdings, Inc. Warrants — meaning it keeps 39. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DUOL leads at 13. 1% versus -79. 0% for KIDZW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DUOL leads at 72. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — KIDZW or DUOL?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
06Is KIDZW or DUOL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Duolingo, Inc.
(DUOL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 20)). Classover Holdings, Inc. Warrants (KIDZW) carries a higher beta of 2. 64 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between KIDZW and DUOL?
These companies operate in different sectors (KIDZW (Consumer Defensive) and DUOL (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: KIDZW is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DUOL is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.
Compare KIDZW vs GOTU
GOTU is one of the most direct listed alternatives to KIDZW.
Compare DUOL vs CHGG
CHGG is one of the most direct listed alternatives to DUOL.
Expand With GOTU + CHGG
GOTU and CHGG are the strongest missing peers across the current compare set.