Education & Training Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
KIDZW vs DUOL vs GOTU vs CHGG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Education & Training Services
Education & Training Services
KIDZW vs DUOL vs GOTU vs CHGG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Education & Training Services | Software - Application | Education & Training Services | Education & Training Services |
| Market Cap | $1.00 | $5.29B | $760M | $143M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4M | $1.10B | $5.85B | $319M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-2M | $422M | $-374M | $-86M |
| Gross Margin | 55.3% | 72.7% | 67.5% | 61.9% |
| Operating Margin | -79.0% | 14.2% | -9.1% | -11.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 38.4x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $94M | $492M | $84M |
| Cash & Equiv. | — | $1.04B | $1.32B | $31M |
KIDZW vs DUOL vs GOTU vs CHGG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Classover Holdings,… (KIDZW) | 100 | 26.7 | -73.3% |
| Duolingo, Inc. (DUOL) | 100 | 29.2 | -70.8% |
| Gaotu Techedu Inc. (GOTU) | 100 | 63.3 | -36.7% |
| Chegg, Inc. (CHGG) | 100 | 176.0 | +76.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KIDZW vs DUOL vs GOTU vs CHGG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KIDZW lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
DUOL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 38.7%, EPS growth 355.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 41.1%
- -18.3% 10Y total return vs CHGG's -70.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.20, Low D/E 7.0%, current ratio 2.61x
- Beta 1.20, current ratio 2.61x
GOTU is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- beta 0.99
- 56.0% revenue growth vs KIDZW's -100.0%
- Beta 0.99 vs CHGG's 2.97, lower leverage
CHGG is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +79.3% vs KIDZW's -92.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 56.0% revenue growth vs KIDZW's -100.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 38.4% margin vs KIDZW's -53.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.99 vs CHGG's 2.97, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +79.3% vs KIDZW's -92.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 22.6% ROA vs CHGG's -26.3%, ROIC 40.8% vs -13.4% |
KIDZW vs DUOL vs GOTU vs CHGG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
KIDZW vs DUOL vs GOTU vs CHGG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DUOL leads in 3 of 6 categories
CHGG leads 1 • KIDZW leads 0 • GOTU leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DUOL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GOTU is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.8B annually — 1580.2x KIDZW's $4M. DUOL is the more profitable business, keeping 38.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KIDZW's -53.2%. On growth, GOTU holds the edge at +32.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4M | $1.1B | $5.8B | $319M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2M | $167M | -$378M | $11M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$2M | $422M | -$374M | -$86M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4M | $423M | $0 | -$25M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.3% | +72.7% | +67.5% | +61.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -79.0% | +14.2% | -9.1% | -11.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -53.2% | +38.4% | -6.4% | -26.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -94.8% | +38.5% | +1.7% | -8.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +31.5% | +26.5% | +32.9% | -47.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +29.2% | +66.7% | +101.2% |
Valuation Metrics
CHGG leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, CHGG's 12.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DUOL's 29.0x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1 | $5.3B | $760M | $143M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1 | $4.4B | $638M | $196M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.01x | 13.26x | -4.86x | -1.33x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 38.44x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 29.01x | — | 12.82x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 5.10x | 1.12x | 0.38x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 4.07x | 2.67x | 1.15x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 14.32x | 64.81x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
DUOL leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DUOL delivers a 33.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $34 in annual profit, vs $-63 for CHGG. DUOL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CHGG's 0.70x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CHGG scores 6/9 vs KIDZW's 0/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -36.5% | +33.6% | -21.8% | -62.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -8.7% | +22.6% | -6.8% | -26.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +40.8% | -47.8% | -13.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +7.9% | -39.9% | -26.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.07x | 0.25x | 0.70x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $0 | -$943M | -$829M | $53M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | — | $1.0B | $1.3B | $31M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $94M | $492M | $84M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.46x | — | — | -525.53x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DUOL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in DUOL five years ago would be worth $8,173 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $150 for CHGG. Over the past 12 months, CHGG leads with a +79.3% total return vs KIDZW's -92.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DUOL at -4.8% vs CHGG's -49.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +10.8% | -35.6% | -19.3% | +30.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -92.6% | -77.1% | -39.4% | +79.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | -13.8% | -32.3% | -87.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | -18.3% | -92.4% | -98.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | -18.3% | -81.2% | -70.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | — | -4.8% | -12.2% | -49.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GOTU and CHGG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GOTU is the less volatile stock with a 0.99 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CHGG's 2.97 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CHGG currently trades 67.4% from its 52-week high vs KIDZW's 3.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.64x | 1.20x | 0.99x | 2.97x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $0.38 | $544.93 | $4.56 | $1.90 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.01 | $87.89 | $1.84 | $0.53 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +3.5% | +20.8% | +43.2% | +67.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.3 | 52.3 | 52.7 | 63.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 99K | 2.6M | 395K | 1.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DUOL as "Hold", GOTU as "Hold", CHGG as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 2276.6% upside for CHGG (target: $30) vs 49.2% for GOTU (target: $3).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $220.56 | $2.94 | $30.42 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 22 | 10 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +4.0% | 0.0% |
DUOL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CHGG leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
KIDZW vs DUOL vs GOTU vs CHGG: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KIDZW or DUOL or GOTU or CHGG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Gaotu Techedu Inc.
(GOTU) is the stronger pick with 56. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Classover Holdings, Inc. Warrants (KIDZW). Duolingo, Inc. (DUOL) offers the better valuation at 13. 3x trailing P/E (38. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Duolingo, Inc. (DUOL) a "Hold" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — KIDZW or DUOL or GOTU or CHGG?
Over the past 5 years, Duolingo, Inc.
(DUOL) delivered a total return of -18. 3%, compared to -98. 5% for Chegg, Inc. (CHGG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DUOL returned -18. 3% versus GOTU's -81. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — KIDZW or DUOL or GOTU or CHGG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Gaotu Techedu Inc.
(GOTU) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 99β versus Chegg, Inc. 's 2. 97β — meaning CHGG is approximately 201% more volatile than GOTU relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Duolingo, Inc. (DUOL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 70% for Chegg, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — KIDZW or DUOL or GOTU or CHGG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Gaotu Techedu Inc.
(GOTU) is pulling ahead at 56. 0% versus -100. 0% for Classover Holdings, Inc. Warrants (KIDZW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Duolingo, Inc. grew EPS 355. 9% year-over-year, compared to -145. 0% for Gaotu Techedu Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DUOL leads at 41. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — KIDZW or DUOL or GOTU or CHGG?
Duolingo, Inc.
(DUOL) is the more profitable company, earning 39. 9% net margin versus -53. 2% for Classover Holdings, Inc. Warrants — meaning it keeps 39. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DUOL leads at 13. 1% versus -79. 0% for KIDZW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DUOL leads at 72. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is KIDZW or DUOL or GOTU or CHGG more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CHGG: 2276.
6% to $30. 42.
07Which pays a better dividend — KIDZW or DUOL or GOTU or CHGG?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is KIDZW or DUOL or GOTU or CHGG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Gaotu Techedu Inc.
(GOTU) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 99)). Chegg, Inc. (CHGG) carries a higher beta of 2. 97 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GOTU: -81. 2%, CHGG: -70. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between KIDZW and DUOL and GOTU and CHGG?
These companies operate in different sectors (KIDZW (Consumer Defensive) and DUOL (Technology) and GOTU (Consumer Defensive) and CHGG (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: KIDZW is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DUOL is a small-cap high-growth stock; GOTU is a small-cap high-growth stock; CHGG is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.