Education & Training Services
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
KIDZW vs NUVL vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Banks - Diversified
KIDZW vs NUVL vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Education & Training Services | Biotechnology | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $15K | $9.08B | $892.31B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3M | $0.00 | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-11M | $-450M | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 57.8% | — | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | -136.5% | — | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 14.3x |
| Total Debt | $9M | $0.00 | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $262M | $343.34B |
KIDZW vs NUVL vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 22 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| KIDZ AI Inc. Warran… (KIDZW) | 100 | 0.3 | -99.7% |
| Nuvalent, Inc. (NUVL) | 100 | 825.2 | +725.2% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 225.2 | +125.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KIDZW vs NUVL vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KIDZW plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
NUVL is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 5.6% 10Y total return vs JPM's 475.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.87, current ratio 15.27x
- Beta 0.87, current ratio 15.27x
JPM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.94, yield 1.9%
- Rev growth 3.3%, EPS growth 1.5%
- 3.3% NII/revenue growth vs NUVL's -29.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.3% NII/revenue growth vs NUVL's -29.8% | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.4% margin vs KIDZW's -356.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.87 vs KIDZW's 2.66 | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +61.6% vs KIDZW's -99.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.3% ROA vs KIDZW's -60.2%, ROIC 4.5% vs -57.7% |
KIDZW vs NUVL vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
KIDZW vs NUVL vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM and NUVL operate at a comparable scale, with $280.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KIDZW's -3.6%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3M | $0 | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$3M | -$346M | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$11M | -$450M | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4M | -$313M | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +57.8% | — | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -136.5% | — | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.6% | — | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -136.0% | — | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -36.4% | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.4% | -17.8% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
KIDZW leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $14,616 | $9.1B | $892.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7M | $8.8B | $1.49T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.00x | -21.09x | 15.93x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 14.34x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 18.32x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.00x | — | 3.19x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.00x | 7.18x | 2.46x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 8.85x |
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-3 for KIDZW. KIDZW carries lower financial leverage with a 2.50x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), JPM scores 5/9 vs NUVL's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.8% | -42.8% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -60.2% | -37.8% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -57.7% | -32.5% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -61.4% | -34.4% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 1 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.50x | — | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $7M | -$262M | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $262M | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $9M | $0 | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -11.06x | -36.13x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NUVL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NUVL five years ago would be worth $65,797 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $34 for KIDZW. Over the past 12 months, NUVL leads with a +61.6% total return vs KIDZW's -99.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NUVL at 40.3% vs KIDZW's -77.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -14.2% | +22.3% | -0.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -99.4% | +61.6% | +20.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.9% | +176.1% | +133.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.7% | +558.0% | +120.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.7% | +558.0% | +475.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -77.5% | +40.3% | +32.7% |
Risk & Volatility
NUVL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NUVL is the less volatile stock with a 0.87 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KIDZW's 2.66 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NUVL currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs KIDZW's 0.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.66x | 0.87x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.00 | $123.62 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.01 | $71.13 | $266.85 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.5% | +99.8% | +94.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 32.2 | 66.7 | 65.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 7K | 2.0M | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
JPM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NUVL as "Hold", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 7.6% upside for NUVL (target: $133) vs 6.4% for JPM (target: $340). JPM is the only dividend payer here at 1.86% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $132.74 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 17 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.9% |
JPM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NUVL leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility).
KIDZW vs NUVL vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KIDZW or NUVL or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger pick with 3. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 4% for KIDZ AI Inc. Warrant 2025 - 04. 03. 30 on KIDZ AI (KIDZW). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 15. 9x trailing P/E (14. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) a "Buy" — based on 61 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — KIDZW or NUVL or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, Nuvalent, Inc.
(NUVL) delivered a total return of +558. 0%, compared to -99. 7% for KIDZ AI Inc. Warrant 2025 - 04. 03. 30 on KIDZ AI (KIDZW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NUVL returned +558. 0% versus KIDZW's -99. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — KIDZW or NUVL or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Nuvalent, Inc.
(NUVL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 87β versus KIDZ AI Inc. Warrant 2025 - 04. 03. 30 on KIDZ AI's 2. 66β — meaning KIDZW is approximately 206% more volatile than NUVL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, KIDZ AI Inc. Warrant 2025 - 04. 03. 30 on KIDZ AI (KIDZW) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — KIDZW or NUVL or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is pulling ahead at 3. 3% versus -8. 4% for KIDZ AI Inc. Warrant 2025 - 04. 03. 30 on KIDZ AI (KIDZW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: JPMorgan Chase & Co. grew EPS 1. 5% year-over-year, compared to -498. 7% for KIDZ AI Inc. Warrant 2025 - 04. 03. 30 on KIDZ AI. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — KIDZW or NUVL or JPM?
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus -209. 3% for KIDZ AI Inc. Warrant 2025 - 04. 03. 30 on KIDZ AI — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus -106. 7% for KIDZW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JPM leads at 59. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is KIDZW or NUVL or JPM more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NUVL: 7.
6% to $132. 74.
07Which pays a better dividend — KIDZW or NUVL or JPM?
In this comparison, JPM (1.
9% yield) pays a dividend. KIDZW, NUVL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is KIDZW or NUVL or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), 1. 9% yield, +475. 6% 10Y return). KIDZ AI Inc. Warrant 2025 - 04. 03. 30 on KIDZ AI (KIDZW) carries a higher beta of 2. 66 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +475. 6%, KIDZW: -99. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between KIDZW and NUVL and JPM?
These companies operate in different sectors (KIDZW (Consumer Defensive) and NUVL (Healthcare) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: KIDZW is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NUVL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. JPM pays a dividend while KIDZW, NUVL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.