REIT - Retail
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
KIM vs BRX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Retail
KIM vs BRX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Retail | REIT - Retail |
| Market Cap | $15.88B | $9.24B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.16B | $1.39B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $616M | $444M |
| Gross Margin | 54.7% | 78.5% |
| Operating Margin | 36.1% | 37.4% |
| Forward P/E | 30.5x | 29.8x |
| Total Debt | $8.64B | $5.87B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $213M | $362M |
KIM vs BRX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kimco Realty Corpor… (KIM) | 100 | 211.9 | +111.9% |
| Brixmor Property Gr… (BRX) | 100 | 269.9 | +169.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KIM vs BRX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KIM is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 5.1%, EPS growth 50.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.4%
- 4.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs BRX's 3.8%
BRX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.46, yield 3.8%
- 54.4% 10Y total return vs KIM's 12.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.46, current ratio 1.10x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.7% FFO/revenue growth vs KIM's 5.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (29.8x vs 30.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 32.0% margin vs KIM's 28.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.46 vs KIM's 0.54 | |
| Dividends | 4.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs BRX's 3.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +23.8% vs KIM's +18.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.0% ROA vs KIM's 3.1%, ROIC 4.6% vs 3.0% |
KIM vs BRX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
KIM vs BRX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BRX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KIM is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.2B annually — 1.6x BRX's $1.4B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 32.0% (BRX) to 28.5% (KIM).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.2B | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.4B | $937M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $616M | $444M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $844M | $663M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +54.7% | +78.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +36.1% | +37.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +28.5% | +32.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +39.0% | +47.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.0% | +5.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +27.8% | +78.3% |
Valuation Metrics
BRX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 24.1x trailing earnings, BRX trades at a 15% valuation discount to KIM's 28.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BRX's 16.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KIM's 17.7x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $15.9B | $9.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $24.3B | $14.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 28.36x | 24.10x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 30.49x | 29.77x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.71x | 16.06x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 7.42x | 6.74x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.50x | 3.08x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 20.55x | 14.17x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BRX leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BRX delivers a 14.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $6 for KIM. KIM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.82x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BRX's 1.95x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BRX scores 6/9 vs KIM's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.8% | +14.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.1% | +5.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.0% | +4.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.9% | +6.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.82x | 1.95x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $8.4B | $5.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $213M | $362M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $8.6B | $5.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.46x | 2.72x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BRX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BRX five years ago would be worth $16,241 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,685 for KIM. Over the past 12 months, BRX leads with a +23.8% total return vs KIM's +18.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BRX at 16.2% vs KIM's 12.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +18.6% | +18.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +18.5% | +23.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +41.3% | +56.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +36.9% | +62.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +12.9% | +54.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +12.2% | +16.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KIM and BRX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BRX is the less volatile stock with a 0.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KIM's 0.54 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.54x | 0.46x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.31 | $31.49 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $19.76 | $24.38 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.8% | +95.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.7 | 49.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.1M | 2.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — KIM and BRX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates KIM as "Hold" and BRX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 3.0% upside for KIM (target: $24) vs 2.9% for BRX (target: $31). For income investors, KIM offers the higher dividend yield at 4.50% vs BRX's 3.82%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $24.25 | $31.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 36 | 30 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.5% | +3.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.06 | $1.15 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.8% | +0.0% |
BRX leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 2 categories are tied.
KIM vs BRX: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KIM or BRX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Brixmor Property Group Inc.
(BRX) is the stronger pick with 6. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 1% for Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM). Brixmor Property Group Inc. (BRX) offers the better valuation at 24. 1x trailing P/E (29. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Brixmor Property Group Inc. (BRX) a "Buy" — based on 30 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KIM or BRX?
On trailing P/E, Brixmor Property Group Inc.
(BRX) is the cheapest at 24. 1x versus Kimco Realty Corporation at 28. 4x. On forward P/E, Brixmor Property Group Inc. is actually cheaper at 29. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KIM or BRX?
Over the past 5 years, Brixmor Property Group Inc.
(BRX) delivered a total return of +62. 4%, compared to +36. 9% for Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BRX returned +54. 4% versus KIM's +12. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KIM or BRX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Brixmor Property Group Inc.
(BRX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 46β versus Kimco Realty Corporation's 0. 54β — meaning KIM is approximately 19% more volatile than BRX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 82% versus 195% for Brixmor Property Group Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KIM or BRX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Brixmor Property Group Inc.
(BRX) is pulling ahead at 6. 7% versus 5. 1% for Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kimco Realty Corporation grew EPS 50. 9% year-over-year, compared to 12. 6% for Brixmor Property Group Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, KIM leads at 7. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KIM or BRX?
Brixmor Property Group Inc.
(BRX) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 2% net margin versus 27. 3% for Kimco Realty Corporation — meaning it keeps 28. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BRX leads at 36. 7% versus 35. 2% for KIM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BRX leads at 75. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KIM or BRX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Brixmor Property Group Inc.
(BRX) trades at 29. 8x forward P/E versus 30. 5x for Kimco Realty Corporation — 0. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KIM: 3. 0% to $24. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — KIM or BRX?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM) offers the highest yield at 4. 5%, versus 3. 8% for Brixmor Property Group Inc. (BRX).
09Is KIM or BRX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Brixmor Property Group Inc.
(BRX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 46), 3. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BRX: +54. 4%, KIM: +12. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KIM and BRX?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.