KIM
Kimco Realty Corporation
REIT - Retail
Market Cap$15.88B
5Y Perf.+111.9%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
KIM vs WMT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
WMT
Walmart Inc.
Specialty Retail
Market Cap$1.04T
5Y Perf.+216.3%
KIM vs WMT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | KIM | WMT |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Retail | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $15.88B | $1.04T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.16B | $703.06B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $616M | $22.91B |
| Gross Margin | 54.7% | 24.9% |
| Operating Margin | 36.1% | 4.1% |
| Forward P/E | 30.5x | 44.9x |
| Total Debt | $8.64B | $67.09B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $213M | $10.73B |
KIM vs WMT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
KIM
WMT
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kimco Realty Corpor… (KIM) | 100 | 211.9 | +111.9% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 100 | 316.3 | +216.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KIM vs WMT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: KIM leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Walmart Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and recent price momentum and sentiment. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
KIM
Kimco Realty Corporation
The Real Estate Income Play
KIM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and defensive.
- Rev growth 5.1%, EPS growth 50.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.4%
- Beta 0.54, yield 4.5%, current ratio 1.08x
- 5.1% FFO/revenue growth vs WMT's 4.7%
Best for: growth exposure and defensive
WMT
Walmart Inc.
The Income Pick
WMT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 37 yrs, beta 0.12, yield 0.7%
- 5.2% 10Y total return vs KIM's 12.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.12, Low D/E 67.2%, current ratio 0.79x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | KIM | 5.1% FFO/revenue growth vs WMT's 4.7% |
| Value | KIM | Lower P/E (30.5x vs 44.9x) |
| Quality / Margins | KIM | 28.5% margin vs WMT's 3.3% |
| Stability / Safety | WMT | Beta 0.12 vs KIM's 0.54, lower leverage |
| Dividends | KIM | 4.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs WMT's 0.7% |
| Momentum (1Y) | WMT | +32.6% vs KIM's +18.5% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | WMT | 7.9% ROA vs KIM's 3.1%, ROIC 14.7% vs 3.0% |
KIM vs WMT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2018
FY 2025
KIM vs WMT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLWMTLAGGINGKIM
KIMKimco Realty Corporat…
2leads
WMTWalmart Inc.
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs KIMMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
KIM4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
KIM5/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
WMT7/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
WMT5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
WMT2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KIM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $703.1B annually — 325.3x KIM's $2.2B. KIM is the more profitable business, keeping 28.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WMT's 3.3%.
| Metric | KIMKimco Realty Corp… | WMTWalmart Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.2B | $703.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.4B | $42.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $616M | $22.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $844M | $15.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +54.7% | +24.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +36.1% | +4.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +28.5% | +3.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +39.0% | +2.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.0% | +5.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +27.8% | +35.1% |
KIM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
KIM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 28.4x trailing earnings, KIM trades at a 41% valuation discount to WMT's 47.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, KIM's 17.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WMT's 25.0x.
| Metric | KIMKimco Realty Corp… | WMTWalmart Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $15.9B | $1.04T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $24.3B | $1.10T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 28.36x | 47.91x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 30.49x | 44.91x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.35x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.71x | 24.96x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 7.42x | 1.46x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.50x | 10.50x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 20.55x | 25.08x |
KIM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WMT leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WMT delivers a 22.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $6 for KIM. WMT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.67x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KIM's 0.82x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WMT scores 6/9 vs KIM's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | KIMKimco Realty Corp… | WMTWalmart Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.8% | +22.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.1% | +7.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.0% | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.9% | +17.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.82x | 0.67x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $8.4B | $56.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $213M | $10.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $8.6B | $67.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.46x | 11.85x |
WMT leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WMT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WMT five years ago would be worth $28,774 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,685 for KIM. Over the past 12 months, WMT leads with a +32.6% total return vs KIM's +18.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WMT at 38.1% vs KIM's 12.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | KIMKimco Realty Corp… | WMTWalmart Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +18.6% | +16.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +18.5% | +32.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +41.3% | +163.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +36.9% | +187.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +12.9% | +517.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +12.2% | +38.1% |
WMT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WMT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WMT is the less volatile stock with a 0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KIM's 0.54 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | KIMKimco Realty Corp… | WMTWalmart Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.54x | 0.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.31 | $134.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $19.76 | $91.89 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.8% | +97.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.7 | 57.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.1M | 17.5M |
WMT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — KIM and WMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates KIM as "Hold" and WMT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 4.8% upside for WMT (target: $137) vs 3.0% for KIM (target: $24). For income investors, KIM offers the higher dividend yield at 4.50% vs WMT's 0.72%.
| Metric | KIMKimco Realty Corp… | WMTWalmart Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $24.25 | $137.04 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 36 | 64 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.5% | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 37 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.06 | $0.94 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.8% | +0.8% |
Evenly matched — KIM and WMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
WMT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). KIM leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Best OverallWalmart Inc. (WMT)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
KIM vs WMT: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KIM or WMT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM) is the stronger pick with 5.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 7% for Walmart Inc. (WMT). Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM) offers the better valuation at 28. 4x trailing P/E (30. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Walmart Inc. (WMT) a "Buy" — based on 64 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KIM or WMT?
On trailing P/E, Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM) is the cheapest at 28.
4x versus Walmart Inc. at 47. 9x. On forward P/E, Kimco Realty Corporation is actually cheaper at 30. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KIM or WMT?
Over the past 5 years, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) delivered a total return of +187. 7%, compared to +36. 9% for Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WMT returned +517. 6% versus KIM's +12. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KIM or WMT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 12β versus Kimco Realty Corporation's 0. 54β — meaning KIM is approximately 364% more volatile than WMT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Walmart Inc. (WMT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 67% versus 82% for Kimco Realty Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KIM or WMT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM) is pulling ahead at 5.
1% versus 4. 7% for Walmart Inc. (WMT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kimco Realty Corporation grew EPS 50. 9% year-over-year, compared to 13. 3% for Walmart Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, KIM leads at 7. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KIM or WMT?
Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus 3. 1% for Walmart Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KIM leads at 35. 2% versus 4. 2% for WMT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KIM leads at 54. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KIM or WMT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM) trades at 30.
5x forward P/E versus 44. 9x for Walmart Inc. — 14. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WMT: 4. 8% to $137. 04.
08Which pays a better dividend — KIM or WMT?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM) offers the highest yield at 4. 5%, versus 0. 7% for Walmart Inc. (WMT).
09Is KIM or WMT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 12), 0. 7% yield, +517. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WMT: +517. 6%, KIM: +12. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KIM and WMT?
These companies operate in different sectors (KIM (Real Estate) and WMT (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: KIM is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; WMT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(KIM: 4.0% · WMT: 5.8%)Net Margin>
%
(KIM: 28.5% · WMT: 3.3%)P/E Ratio<
x
(KIM: 28.4x · WMT: 47.9x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.