Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
KLAR vs FOUR vs PYPL vs FIS vs V
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
Financial - Credit Services
Information Technology Services
Financial - Credit Services
KLAR vs FOUR vs PYPL vs FIS vs V — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure | Financial - Credit Services | Information Technology Services | Financial - Credit Services |
| Market Cap | $5.33B | $2.82B | $40.08B | $22.25B | $626.22B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.00B | $3.33B | $33.17B | $11.66B | $40.00B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-279M | $86M | $5.06B | $2.67B | $22.24B |
| Gross Margin | 63.1% | 35.2% | 46.6% | 37.6% | 80.4% |
| Operating Margin | -8.2% | 11.3% | 18.3% | 17.0% | 60.0% |
| Forward P/E | 543.5x | 7.3x | 8.5x | 6.9x | 24.9x |
| Total Debt | $791M | $4.62B | $9.99B | $4.01B | $25.17B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3.24B | $964M | $8.05B | $599M | $20.15B |
KLAR vs FOUR vs PYPL vs FIS vs V — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shift4 Payments, In… (FOUR) | 100 | 114.9 | +14.9% |
| PayPal Holdings, In… (PYPL) | 100 | 26.1 | -73.9% |
| Fidelity National I… (FIS) | 100 | 32.1 | -67.9% |
| Visa Inc. (V) | 100 | 169.0 | +69.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KLAR vs FOUR vs PYPL vs FIS vs V
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KLAR is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 21.2%, EPS growth 101.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 18.1%
FOUR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for defensive.
- Beta 1.45, yield 0.8%, current ratio 1.66x
- 25.5% revenue growth vs PYPL's 4.3%
Among these 5 stocks, PYPL doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
FIS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.65, Low D/E 28.9%, current ratio 0.59x
- PEG 0.28 vs V's 1.57
- Lower P/E (6.9x vs 24.9x), PEG 0.28 vs 1.57
- 3.8% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs V's 0.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
V carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.65, yield 0.7%
- 338.2% 10Y total return vs FOUR's 21.6%
- 50.1% margin vs KLAR's -9.3%
- Beta 0.65 vs KLAR's 2.34
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 25.5% revenue growth vs PYPL's 4.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.9x vs 24.9x), PEG 0.28 vs 1.57 | |
| Quality / Margins | 50.1% margin vs KLAR's -9.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.65 vs KLAR's 2.34 | |
| Dividends | 3.8% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs V's 0.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -7.4% vs KLAR's -69.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 22.7% ROA vs KLAR's -1.3%, ROIC 29.2% vs -218.7% |
KLAR vs FOUR vs PYPL vs FIS vs V — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
KLAR vs FOUR vs PYPL vs FIS vs V — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
V leads in 4 of 6 categories
PYPL leads 1 • KLAR leads 0 • FOUR leads 0 • FIS leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
V leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
V is the larger business by revenue, generating $40.0B annually — 13.3x KLAR's $3.0B. V is the more profitable business, keeping 50.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KLAR's -9.3%. On growth, FIS holds the edge at +30.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.0B | $3.3B | $33.2B | $11.7B | $40.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$109M | $629M | $6.7B | $3.4B | $27.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$279M | $86M | $5.1B | $2.7B | $22.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3.2B | $687M | $5.5B | $2.7B | $21.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +63.1% | +35.2% | +46.6% | +37.6% | +80.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -8.2% | +11.3% | +18.3% | +17.0% | +60.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -9.3% | +2.6% | +15.8% | +22.9% | +50.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +105.1% | +20.6% | +16.8% | +23.6% | +53.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -100.0% | — | +30.1% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -105.0% | -6.2% | +30.6% | +35.3% |
Valuation Metrics
PYPL leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.4x trailing earnings, PYPL trades at a 100% valuation discount to KLAR's 2109.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PYPL offers better value at 0.95x vs FIS's 2.35x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.3B | $2.8B | $40.1B | $22.2B | $626.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.9B | $6.5B | $42.0B | $25.7B | $631.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 2108.96x | 37.76x | 8.40x | 57.39x | 32.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 543.46x | 7.32x | 8.55x | 6.86x | 24.86x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.95x | 2.35x | 2.02x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 42.33x | 8.27x | 5.98x | 7.05x | 25.04x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.00x | 0.67x | 1.21x | 2.08x | 15.66x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.28x | 1.85x | 2.17x | 1.61x | 16.93x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.84x | 5.65x | 7.20x | 7.92x | 29.02x |
Profitability & Efficiency
V leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
V delivers a 58.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $59 in annual profit, vs $-11 for KLAR. FIS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.29x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FOUR's 2.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PYPL scores 8/9 vs V's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -10.6% | +4.4% | +25.1% | +18.4% | +58.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.3% | +1.0% | +6.3% | +7.5% | +22.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.2% | +6.3% | +15.0% | +6.0% | +29.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.0% | +6.3% | +18.1% | +6.6% | +36.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.35x | 2.36x | 0.49x | 0.29x | 0.66x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$2.5B | $3.7B | $1.9B | $3.4B | $5.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3.2B | $964M | $8.0B | $599M | $20.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $791M | $4.6B | $10.0B | $4.0B | $25.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.15x | 3.40x | 19.28x | 15.37x | 26.72x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
V leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in V five years ago would be worth $15,266 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,906 for PYPL. Over the past 12 months, V leads with a -7.4% total return vs KLAR's -69.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors V at 12.9% vs KLAR's -32.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -50.5% | -34.9% | -21.6% | -33.7% | -5.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -69.2% | -54.7% | -36.8% | -43.4% | -7.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -69.2% | -33.7% | -25.9% | -12.7% | +44.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -69.2% | -49.1% | -80.9% | -64.3% | +52.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -69.2% | +21.6% | +15.7% | -19.1% | +338.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -32.4% | -12.8% | -9.5% | -4.4% | +12.9% |
Risk & Volatility
V leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
V is the less volatile stock with a 0.65 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KLAR's 2.34 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. V currently trades 86.9% from its 52-week high vs KLAR's 24.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.34x | 1.45x | 1.32x | 0.65x | 0.65x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $57.20 | $108.50 | $79.50 | $82.74 | $375.51 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.06 | $39.61 | $38.46 | $41.63 | $293.89 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +24.7% | +37.6% | +57.2% | +52.0% | +86.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.9 | 42.3 | 36.8 | 32.7 | 57.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.5M | 1.9M | 14.7M | 5.7M | 6.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FIS and V each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: KLAR as "Buy", FOUR as "Buy", PYPL as "Hold", FIS as "Buy", V as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 78.5% upside for FOUR (target: $73) vs 11.0% for V (target: $362). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 3.79% vs PYPL's 0.30%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $24.83 | $72.79 | $51.19 | $67.14 | $362.45 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 29 | 70 | 37 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.8% | +0.3% | +3.8% | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 1 | 1 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.34 | $0.13 | $1.63 | $2.36 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +17.3% | +15.1% | +6.4% | +2.1% |
V leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PYPL leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
KLAR vs FOUR vs PYPL vs FIS vs V: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KLAR or FOUR or PYPL or FIS or V a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Shift4 Payments, Inc.
(FOUR) is the stronger pick with 25. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 3% for PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL). PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL) offers the better valuation at 8. 4x trailing P/E (8. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Klarna Group plc (KLAR) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KLAR or FOUR or PYPL or FIS or V?
On trailing P/E, PayPal Holdings, Inc.
(PYPL) is the cheapest at 8. 4x versus Klarna Group plc at 2109. 0x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 28x versus Visa Inc. 's 1. 57x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KLAR or FOUR or PYPL or FIS or V?
Over the past 5 years, Visa Inc.
(V) delivered a total return of +52. 7%, compared to -80. 9% for PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: V returned +338. 2% versus KLAR's -69. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KLAR or FOUR or PYPL or FIS or V?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Visa Inc.
(V) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 65β versus Klarna Group plc's 2. 34β — meaning KLAR is approximately 262% more volatile than V relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 29% versus 2% for Shift4 Payments, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KLAR or FOUR or PYPL or FIS or V?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Shift4 Payments, Inc.
(FOUR) is pulling ahead at 25. 5% versus 4. 3% for PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Klarna Group plc grew EPS 101. 0% year-over-year, compared to -64. 4% for Shift4 Payments, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FOUR leads at 28. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KLAR or FOUR or PYPL or FIS or V?
Visa Inc.
(V) is the more profitable company, earning 50. 1% net margin versus 0. 1% for Klarna Group plc — meaning it keeps 50. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: V leads at 60. 0% versus -4. 5% for KLAR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — V leads at 80. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KLAR or FOUR or PYPL or FIS or V more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 28x versus Visa Inc. 's 1. 57x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 6. 9x forward P/E versus 543. 5x for Klarna Group plc — 536. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FOUR: 78. 5% to $72. 79.
08Which pays a better dividend — KLAR or FOUR or PYPL or FIS or V?
In this comparison, FIS (3.
8% yield), FOUR (0. 8% yield), V (0. 7% yield), PYPL (0. 3% yield) pay a dividend. KLAR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is KLAR or FOUR or PYPL or FIS or V better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Visa Inc.
(V) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 65), 0. 7% yield, +338. 2% 10Y return). Klarna Group plc (KLAR) carries a higher beta of 2. 34 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (V: +338. 2%, KLAR: -69. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KLAR and FOUR and PYPL and FIS and V?
These companies operate in different sectors (KLAR (Technology) and FOUR (Technology) and PYPL (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology) and V (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: KLAR is a small-cap high-growth stock; FOUR is a small-cap high-growth stock; PYPL is a mid-cap deep-value stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; V is a large-cap quality compounder stock. FOUR, FIS, V pay a dividend while KLAR, PYPL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.