Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
KLRS logo
KLRS
ADMA logo
ADMA
GRFS logo
GRFS
REPL logo
REPL
ALNY logo
ALNY
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

KLRS vs ADMA vs GRFS vs REPL vs ALNY

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
KLRS
Kalaris Therapeutics Inc

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$81M
5Y Perf.-46.1%
ADMA
ADMA Biologics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.90B
5Y Perf.-58.6%
GRFS
Grifols, S.A.

Drug Manufacturers - General

HealthcareNASDAQ • ES
Market Cap$6.46B
5Y Perf.+7.5%
REPL
Replimune Group, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$733M
5Y Perf.-8.9%
ALNY
Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$37.74B
5Y Perf.+4.8%

KLRS vs ADMA vs GRFS vs REPL vs ALNY — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
KLRS logoKLRS
ADMA logoADMA
GRFS logoGRFS
REPL logoREPL
ALNY logoALNY
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyDrug Manufacturers - GeneralBiotechnologyBiotechnology
Market Cap$81M$1.90B$6.46B$733M$37.74B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$510M$7.45B$4.29B
Net Income (TTM)$-44M$165M$416M$-315M$577M
Gross Margin61.3%37.7%80.9%
Operating Margin42.1%16.9%17.5%
Forward P/E9.9x8.9x37.7x
Total Debt$1M$80M$8.74B$76M$1.28B
Cash & Equiv.$98M$88M$825M$111M$1.66B

KLRS vs ADMA vs GRFS vs REPL vs ALNYLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

KLRS
ADMA
GRFS
REPL
ALNY
StockMar 25Jun 26Return
Kalaris Therapeutic… (KLRS)10053.9-46.1%
ADMA Biologics, Inc. (ADMA)10041.4-58.6%
Grifols, S.A. (GRFS)100107.5+7.5%
Replimune Group, In… (REPL)10091.1-8.9%
Alnylam Pharmaceuti… (ALNY)100104.8+4.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: KLRS vs ADMA vs GRFS vs REPL vs ALNY

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: KLRS and ADMA are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. ADMA Biologics, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. GRFS and ALNY also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
KLRS
Kalaris Therapeutics Inc
The Defensive Pick

KLRS has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.81, Low D/E 1.8%, current ratio 12.23x
  • Beta 0.81, current ratio 12.23x
  • 100.0% revenue growth vs REPL's -39.7%
  • +56.9% vs ADMA's -62.0%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
ADMA
ADMA Biologics, Inc.
The Income Pick

ADMA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.11
  • 32.4% margin vs KLRS's -1.2%
  • 27.4% ROA vs REPL's -72.2%, ROIC 36.0% vs -51.9%
Best for: income & stability
GRFS
Grifols, S.A.
The Value Play

GRFS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value and dividends.

  • Lower P/E (8.9x vs 37.7x)
  • 2.7% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: value and dividends
REPL
Replimune Group, Inc.
The Healthcare Pick

Among these 5 stocks, REPL doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
ALNY
Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
The Growth Play

ALNY is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 65.2%, EPS growth 206.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 53.0%
  • 366.4% 10Y total return vs ADMA's 15.3%
  • Beta 0.60 vs ADMA's 1.11
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthKLRS logoKLRS100.0% revenue growth vs REPL's -39.7%
ValueGRFS logoGRFSLower P/E (8.9x vs 37.7x)
Quality / MarginsADMA logoADMA32.4% margin vs KLRS's -1.2%
Stability / SafetyALNY logoALNYBeta 0.60 vs ADMA's 1.11
DividendsGRFS logoGRFS2.7% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)KLRS logoKLRS+56.9% vs ADMA's -62.0%
Efficiency (ROA)ADMA logoADMA27.4% ROA vs REPL's -72.2%, ROIC 36.0% vs -51.9%

KLRS vs ADMA vs GRFS vs REPL vs ALNY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Biotech & Healthcare Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Biotech & Healthcare Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
KLRSKalaris Therapeutics Inc

Segment breakdown not available.

ADMAADMA Biologics, Inc.
FY 2024
ADMA BioManufacturing Segment
97.4%$416M
Plasma Collection Centers Segment
2.6%$11M
GRFSGrifols, S.A.
FY 2025
Haemoderivatives
86.2%$6.5B
Transfusional medicine
8.3%$623M
Other Product
3.2%$243M
Bio supplies
2.0%$154M
Other diagnostic
0.2%$17M
REPLReplimune Group, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

ALNYAlnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
FY 2025
GIVLAARI
64.1%$308M
ONPATTRO
35.9%$173M

KLRS vs ADMA vs GRFS vs REPL vs ALNY — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLADMALAGGINGALNY

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — ADMA and ALNY each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

GRFS and KLRS operate at a comparable scale, with $7.4B and $0 in trailing revenue. ADMA is the more profitable business, keeping 32.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GRFS's 5.6%. On growth, ALNY holds the edge at +96.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricKLRS logoKLRSKalaris Therapeut…ADMA logoADMAADMA Biologics, I…GRFS logoGRFSGrifols, S.A.REPL logoREPLReplimune Group, …ALNY logoALNYAlnylam Pharmaceu…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$510M$7.4B$4.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$46M$221M$1.6B-$323M$677M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$44M$165M$416M-$315M$577M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$49M$108M$745M-$283M$641M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+61.3%+37.7%+80.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+42.1%+16.9%+17.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+32.4%+5.6%+13.5%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+21.2%+10.0%+15.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-0.3%-3.2%+96.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+81.7%+72.7%+25.3%+2.5%+4.4%
Evenly matched — ADMA and ALNY each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

GRFS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 11.6x trailing earnings, GRFS trades at a 90% valuation discount to ALNY's 121.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, GRFS's 8.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ALNY's 67.0x.

MetricKLRS logoKLRSKalaris Therapeut…ADMA logoADMAADMA Biologics, I…GRFS logoGRFSGrifols, S.A.REPL logoREPLReplimune Group, …ALNY logoALNYAlnylam Pharmaceu…
Market CapShares × price$81M$1.9B$6.5B$733M$37.7B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash-$16M$1.9B$15.6B$698M$37.4B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-1.52x13.68x11.59x-2.89x121.39x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.9.92x8.94x37.74x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple9.50x8.34x67.05x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.73x0.77x10.16x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.84x4.21x0.59x1.72x48.27x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF68.40x7.44x81.09x
GRFS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ADMA leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

ALNY delivers a 98.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $98 in annual profit, vs $-103 for REPL. KLRS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ALNY's 1.62x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GRFS scores 6/9 vs REPL's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricKLRS logoKLRSKalaris Therapeut…ADMA logoADMAADMA Biologics, I…GRFS logoGRFSGrifols, S.A.REPL logoREPLReplimune Group, …ALNY logoALNYAlnylam Pharmaceu…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-72.8%+39.0%+5.4%-102.7%+98.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-43.5%+27.4%+2.1%-72.2%+11.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital+36.0%+5.4%-51.9%+33.4%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-41.0%+38.8%+6.4%-55.9%+15.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–935626
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.02x0.17x1.15x0.18x1.62x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$97M-$8M$7.9B-$35M-$379M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$98M$88M$825M$111M$1.7B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1M$80M$8.7B$76M$1.3B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-31.98x50.85x2.02x-48.62x2.02x
ADMA leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

ADMA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ADMA five years ago would be worth $44,620 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,561 for REPL. Over the past 12 months, KLRS leads with a +56.9% total return vs ADMA's -62.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ADMA at 28.5% vs REPL's -27.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricKLRS logoKLRSKalaris Therapeut…ADMA logoADMAADMA Biologics, I…GRFS logoGRFSGrifols, S.A.REPL logoREPLReplimune Group, …ALNY logoALNYAlnylam Pharmaceu…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-47.8%-54.1%-17.3%-0.2%-29.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+56.9%-62.0%-13.0%-10.2%-7.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-52.5%+112.1%-11.4%-62.1%+46.5%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-52.5%+346.2%-57.5%-74.4%+69.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-52.5%+15.3%-44.2%-41.4%+366.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-22.0%+28.5%-3.9%-27.7%+13.6%
ADMA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — GRFS and ALNY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

ALNY is the less volatile stock with a 0.60 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ADMA's 1.11 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GRFS currently trades 68.6% from its 52-week high vs KLRS's 36.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricKLRS logoKLRSKalaris Therapeut…ADMA logoADMAADMA Biologics, I…GRFS logoGRFSGrifols, S.A.REPL logoREPLReplimune Group, …ALNY logoALNYAlnylam Pharmaceu…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.81x1.11x0.99x0.84x0.60x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$11.88$22.20$11.14$13.24$495.55
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$2.14$7.21$7.26$1.50$281.76
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+36.4%+37.0%+68.6%+67.1%+57.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10039.744.941.663.444.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded86K5.0M551K8.9M1.0M
Evenly matched — GRFS and ALNY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

ADMA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: ADMA as "Buy", GRFS as "Buy", REPL as "Buy", ALNY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 331.2% upside for KLRS (target: $19) vs 57.6% for ALNY (target: $446). GRFS is the only dividend payer here at 2.73% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricKLRS logoKLRSKalaris Therapeut…ADMA logoADMAADMA Biologics, I…GRFS logoGRFSGrifols, S.A.REPL logoREPLReplimune Group, …ALNY logoALNYAlnylam Pharmaceu…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$18.67$21.00$14.00$445.67
# AnalystsCovering analysts1081552
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.7%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises100
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.18
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+1.7%+2.2%0.0%0.0%
ADMA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

ADMA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). GRFS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallADMA Biologics, Inc. (ADMA)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

KLRS vs ADMA vs GRFS vs REPL vs ALNY: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is KLRS or ADMA or GRFS or REPL or ALNY a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

(ALNY) is the stronger pick with 65. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 2% for Grifols, S. A. (GRFS). Grifols, S. A. (GRFS) offers the better valuation at 11. 6x trailing P/E (8. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ADMA Biologics, Inc. (ADMA) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — KLRS or ADMA or GRFS or REPL or ALNY?

On trailing P/E, Grifols, S.

A. (GRFS) is the cheapest at 11. 6x versus Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. at 121. 4x. On forward P/E, Grifols, S. A. is actually cheaper at 8. 9x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — KLRS or ADMA or GRFS or REPL or ALNY?

Over the past 5 years, ADMA Biologics, Inc.

(ADMA) delivered a total return of +346. 2%, compared to -74. 4% for Replimune Group, Inc. (REPL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ALNY returned +366. 4% versus KLRS's -52. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — KLRS or ADMA or GRFS or REPL or ALNY?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

(ALNY) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 60β versus ADMA Biologics, Inc. 's 1. 11β — meaning ADMA is approximately 84% more volatile than ALNY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kalaris Therapeutics Inc (KLRS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 162% for Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — KLRS or ADMA or GRFS or REPL or ALNY?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

(ALNY) is pulling ahead at 65. 2% versus 0. 2% for Grifols, S. A. (GRFS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. grew EPS 206. 9% year-over-year, compared to -25. 9% for ADMA Biologics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ALNY leads at 53. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — KLRS or ADMA or GRFS or REPL or ALNY?

ADMA Biologics, Inc.

(ADMA) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 8% net margin versus 0. 0% for Replimune Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 28. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ADMA leads at 37. 5% versus 0. 0% for REPL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ALNY leads at 81. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is KLRS or ADMA or GRFS or REPL or ALNY more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Grifols, S.

A. (GRFS) trades at 8. 9x forward P/E versus 37. 7x for Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — 28. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KLRS: 331. 2% to $18. 67.

08

Which pays a better dividend — KLRS or ADMA or GRFS or REPL or ALNY?

In this comparison, GRFS (2.

7% yield) pays a dividend. KLRS, ADMA, REPL, ALNY do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is KLRS or ADMA or GRFS or REPL or ALNY better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

(ALNY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 60), +366. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ALNY: +366. 4%, ADMA: +15. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between KLRS and ADMA and GRFS and REPL and ALNY?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: KLRS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ADMA is a small-cap high-growth stock; GRFS is a small-cap deep-value stock; REPL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ALNY is a mid-cap high-growth stock. GRFS pays a dividend while KLRS, ADMA, REPL, ALNY do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.