Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
KLRS vs ADMA vs GRFS vs REPL vs ALNY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Drug Manufacturers - General
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
KLRS vs ADMA vs GRFS vs REPL vs ALNY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - General | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $81M | $1.90B | $6.46B | $733M | $37.74B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $510M | $7.45B | — | $4.29B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-44M | $165M | $416M | $-315M | $577M |
| Gross Margin | — | 61.3% | 37.7% | — | 80.9% |
| Operating Margin | — | 42.1% | 16.9% | — | 17.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 9.9x | 8.9x | — | 37.7x |
| Total Debt | $1M | $80M | $8.74B | $76M | $1.28B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $98M | $88M | $825M | $111M | $1.66B |
KLRS vs ADMA vs GRFS vs REPL vs ALNY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 25 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kalaris Therapeutic… (KLRS) | 100 | 53.9 | -46.1% |
| ADMA Biologics, Inc. (ADMA) | 100 | 41.4 | -58.6% |
| Grifols, S.A. (GRFS) | 100 | 107.5 | +7.5% |
| Replimune Group, In… (REPL) | 100 | 91.1 | -8.9% |
| Alnylam Pharmaceuti… (ALNY) | 100 | 104.8 | +4.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KLRS vs ADMA vs GRFS vs REPL vs ALNY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KLRS has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.81, Low D/E 1.8%, current ratio 12.23x
- Beta 0.81, current ratio 12.23x
- 100.0% revenue growth vs REPL's -39.7%
- +56.9% vs ADMA's -62.0%
ADMA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.11
- 32.4% margin vs KLRS's -1.2%
- 27.4% ROA vs REPL's -72.2%, ROIC 36.0% vs -51.9%
GRFS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value and dividends.
- Lower P/E (8.9x vs 37.7x)
- 2.7% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Among these 5 stocks, REPL doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
ALNY is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 65.2%, EPS growth 206.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 53.0%
- 366.4% 10Y total return vs ADMA's 15.3%
- Beta 0.60 vs ADMA's 1.11
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 100.0% revenue growth vs REPL's -39.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.9x vs 37.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 32.4% margin vs KLRS's -1.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.60 vs ADMA's 1.11 | |
| Dividends | 2.7% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +56.9% vs ADMA's -62.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 27.4% ROA vs REPL's -72.2%, ROIC 36.0% vs -51.9% |
KLRS vs ADMA vs GRFS vs REPL vs ALNY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
KLRS vs ADMA vs GRFS vs REPL vs ALNY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ADMA leads in 3 of 6 categories
GRFS leads 1 • KLRS leads 0 • REPL leads 0 • ALNY leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — ADMA and ALNY each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GRFS and KLRS operate at a comparable scale, with $7.4B and $0 in trailing revenue. ADMA is the more profitable business, keeping 32.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GRFS's 5.6%. On growth, ALNY holds the edge at +96.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $510M | $7.4B | — | $4.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$46M | $221M | $1.6B | -$323M | $677M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$44M | $165M | $416M | -$315M | $577M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$49M | $108M | $745M | -$283M | $641M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +61.3% | +37.7% | — | +80.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +42.1% | +16.9% | — | +17.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +32.4% | +5.6% | — | +13.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +21.2% | +10.0% | — | +15.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -0.3% | -3.2% | — | +96.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +81.7% | +72.7% | +25.3% | +2.5% | +4.4% |
Valuation Metrics
GRFS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.6x trailing earnings, GRFS trades at a 90% valuation discount to ALNY's 121.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, GRFS's 8.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ALNY's 67.0x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $81M | $1.9B | $6.5B | $733M | $37.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$16M | $1.9B | $15.6B | $698M | $37.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.52x | 13.68x | 11.59x | -2.89x | 121.39x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 9.92x | 8.94x | — | 37.74x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 9.50x | 8.34x | — | 67.05x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 3.73x | 0.77x | — | 10.16x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.84x | 4.21x | 0.59x | 1.72x | 48.27x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 68.40x | 7.44x | — | 81.09x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ADMA leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ALNY delivers a 98.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $98 in annual profit, vs $-103 for REPL. KLRS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ALNY's 1.62x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GRFS scores 6/9 vs REPL's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -72.8% | +39.0% | +5.4% | -102.7% | +98.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -43.5% | +27.4% | +2.1% | -72.2% | +11.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +36.0% | +5.4% | -51.9% | +33.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -41.0% | +38.8% | +6.4% | -55.9% | +15.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 0.17x | 1.15x | 0.18x | 1.62x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$97M | -$8M | $7.9B | -$35M | -$379M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $98M | $88M | $825M | $111M | $1.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $80M | $8.7B | $76M | $1.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -31.98x | 50.85x | 2.02x | -48.62x | 2.02x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ADMA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ADMA five years ago would be worth $44,620 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,561 for REPL. Over the past 12 months, KLRS leads with a +56.9% total return vs ADMA's -62.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ADMA at 28.5% vs REPL's -27.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -47.8% | -54.1% | -17.3% | -0.2% | -29.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +56.9% | -62.0% | -13.0% | -10.2% | -7.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -52.5% | +112.1% | -11.4% | -62.1% | +46.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -52.5% | +346.2% | -57.5% | -74.4% | +69.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -52.5% | +15.3% | -44.2% | -41.4% | +366.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -22.0% | +28.5% | -3.9% | -27.7% | +13.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GRFS and ALNY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ALNY is the less volatile stock with a 0.60 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ADMA's 1.11 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GRFS currently trades 68.6% from its 52-week high vs KLRS's 36.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.81x | 1.11x | 0.99x | 0.84x | 0.60x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.88 | $22.20 | $11.14 | $13.24 | $495.55 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.14 | $7.21 | $7.26 | $1.50 | $281.76 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +36.4% | +37.0% | +68.6% | +67.1% | +57.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.7 | 44.9 | 41.6 | 63.4 | 44.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 86K | 5.0M | 551K | 8.9M | 1.0M |
Analyst Outlook
ADMA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ADMA as "Buy", GRFS as "Buy", REPL as "Buy", ALNY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 331.2% upside for KLRS (target: $19) vs 57.6% for ALNY (target: $446). GRFS is the only dividend payer here at 2.73% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $18.67 | $21.00 | — | $14.00 | $445.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 | 8 | 15 | 52 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +2.7% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.18 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.7% | +2.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ADMA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). GRFS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
KLRS vs ADMA vs GRFS vs REPL vs ALNY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KLRS or ADMA or GRFS or REPL or ALNY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ALNY) is the stronger pick with 65. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 2% for Grifols, S. A. (GRFS). Grifols, S. A. (GRFS) offers the better valuation at 11. 6x trailing P/E (8. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ADMA Biologics, Inc. (ADMA) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KLRS or ADMA or GRFS or REPL or ALNY?
On trailing P/E, Grifols, S.
A. (GRFS) is the cheapest at 11. 6x versus Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. at 121. 4x. On forward P/E, Grifols, S. A. is actually cheaper at 8. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KLRS or ADMA or GRFS or REPL or ALNY?
Over the past 5 years, ADMA Biologics, Inc.
(ADMA) delivered a total return of +346. 2%, compared to -74. 4% for Replimune Group, Inc. (REPL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ALNY returned +366. 4% versus KLRS's -52. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KLRS or ADMA or GRFS or REPL or ALNY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ALNY) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 60β versus ADMA Biologics, Inc. 's 1. 11β — meaning ADMA is approximately 84% more volatile than ALNY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kalaris Therapeutics Inc (KLRS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 162% for Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KLRS or ADMA or GRFS or REPL or ALNY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ALNY) is pulling ahead at 65. 2% versus 0. 2% for Grifols, S. A. (GRFS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. grew EPS 206. 9% year-over-year, compared to -25. 9% for ADMA Biologics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ALNY leads at 53. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KLRS or ADMA or GRFS or REPL or ALNY?
ADMA Biologics, Inc.
(ADMA) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 8% net margin versus 0. 0% for Replimune Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 28. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ADMA leads at 37. 5% versus 0. 0% for REPL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ALNY leads at 81. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KLRS or ADMA or GRFS or REPL or ALNY more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Grifols, S.
A. (GRFS) trades at 8. 9x forward P/E versus 37. 7x for Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — 28. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KLRS: 331. 2% to $18. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — KLRS or ADMA or GRFS or REPL or ALNY?
In this comparison, GRFS (2.
7% yield) pays a dividend. KLRS, ADMA, REPL, ALNY do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is KLRS or ADMA or GRFS or REPL or ALNY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ALNY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 60), +366. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ALNY: +366. 4%, ADMA: +15. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KLRS and ADMA and GRFS and REPL and ALNY?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: KLRS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ADMA is a small-cap high-growth stock; GRFS is a small-cap deep-value stock; REPL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ALNY is a mid-cap high-growth stock. GRFS pays a dividend while KLRS, ADMA, REPL, ALNY do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.