Marine Shipping
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
KNOP vs NAT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Marine Shipping
KNOP vs NAT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Marine Shipping | Marine Shipping |
| Market Cap | $377M | $1.24B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $359M | $281M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $53M | $2M |
| Gross Margin | 40.3% | 16.6% |
| Operating Margin | 30.9% | 6.2% |
| Forward P/E | 7.6x | 10.4x |
| Total Debt | $906M | $270M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $67M | $39M |
KNOP vs NAT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| KNOT Offshore Partn… (KNOP) | 100 | 73.1 | -26.9% |
| Nordic American Tan… (NAT) | 100 | 128.0 | +28.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KNOP vs NAT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KNOP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 7.5%, EPS growth 120.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.6%
- 45.1% 10Y total return vs NAT's -40.4%
- 7.5% revenue growth vs NAT's -10.7%
NAT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.27, yield 7.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.27, Low D/E 53.0%, current ratio 1.65x
- Beta 0.27, yield 7.1%, current ratio 1.65x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.5% revenue growth vs NAT's -10.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.6x vs 10.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 14.7% margin vs NAT's 0.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.27 vs KNOP's 0.36, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 7.1% yield, vs KNOP's 2.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +142.1% vs KNOP's +69.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.2% ROA vs NAT's 0.2%, ROIC 3.7% vs 7.5% |
KNOP vs NAT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
KNOP vs NAT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KNOP leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KNOP and NAT operate at a comparable scale, with $359M and $281M in trailing revenue. KNOP is the more profitable business, keeping 14.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NAT's 0.7%. On growth, KNOP holds the edge at +27.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $359M | $281M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $225M | $75M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $53M | $2M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $155M | -$112M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +40.3% | +16.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +30.9% | +6.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +14.7% | +0.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +43.2% | -39.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +27.0% | -8.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.0% | -131.5% |
Valuation Metrics
KNOP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 26.6x trailing earnings, NAT trades at a 50% valuation discount to KNOP's 52.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, KNOP's 6.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NAT's 11.0x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $377M | $1.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.2B | $1.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 52.79x | 26.59x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.57x | 10.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.62x | 11.01x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.21x | 3.54x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.62x | 2.41x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 2.77x | 9.87x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NAT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KNOP delivers a 8.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $0 for NAT. NAT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.53x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KNOP's 1.48x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KNOP scores 8/9 vs NAT's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.5% | +0.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.2% | +0.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.7% | +7.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.3% | +9.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.48x | 0.53x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $839M | $231M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $67M | $39M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $906M | $270M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.79x | 1.06x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — KNOP and NAT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NAT five years ago would be worth $21,696 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,507 for KNOP. Over the past 12 months, NAT leads with a +142.1% total return vs KNOP's +69.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KNOP at 37.2% vs NAT's 27.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +8.7% | +78.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +69.1% | +142.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +158.4% | +107.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -24.9% | +117.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +45.1% | -40.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +37.2% | +27.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KNOP and NAT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NAT is the less volatile stock with a 0.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KNOP's 0.36 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KNOP currently trades 96.0% from its 52-week high vs NAT's 92.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.36x | 0.27x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.55 | $6.34 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.16 | $2.54 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.0% | +92.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.6 | 52.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 119K | 5.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — KNOP and NAT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates KNOP as "Buy" and NAT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 44.3% upside for KNOP (target: $16) vs -40.2% for NAT (target: $4). For income investors, NAT offers the higher dividend yield at 7.14% vs KNOP's 2.74%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $16.00 | $3.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.7% | +7.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.30 | $0.42 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.3% |
KNOP leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). NAT leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
KNOP vs NAT: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KNOP or NAT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, KNOT Offshore Partners LP (KNOP) is the stronger pick with 7.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 7% for Nordic American Tankers Limited (NAT). Nordic American Tankers Limited (NAT) offers the better valuation at 26. 6x trailing P/E (10. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate KNOT Offshore Partners LP (KNOP) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KNOP or NAT?
On trailing P/E, Nordic American Tankers Limited (NAT) is the cheapest at 26.
6x versus KNOT Offshore Partners LP at 52. 8x. On forward P/E, KNOT Offshore Partners LP is actually cheaper at 7. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KNOP or NAT?
Over the past 5 years, Nordic American Tankers Limited (NAT) delivered a total return of +117.
0%, compared to -24. 9% for KNOT Offshore Partners LP (KNOP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KNOP returned +45. 1% versus NAT's -40. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KNOP or NAT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Nordic American Tankers Limited (NAT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
27β versus KNOT Offshore Partners LP's 0. 36β — meaning KNOP is approximately 31% more volatile than NAT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Nordic American Tankers Limited (NAT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 53% versus 148% for KNOT Offshore Partners LP — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KNOP or NAT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), KNOT Offshore Partners LP (KNOP) is pulling ahead at 7.
5% versus -10. 7% for Nordic American Tankers Limited (NAT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: KNOT Offshore Partners LP grew EPS 120. 4% year-over-year, compared to -53. 2% for Nordic American Tankers Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, NAT leads at 21. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KNOP or NAT?
Nordic American Tankers Limited (NAT) is the more profitable company, earning 13.
3% net margin versus 4. 5% for KNOT Offshore Partners LP — meaning it keeps 13. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KNOP leads at 23. 3% versus 22. 1% for NAT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KNOP leads at 64. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KNOP or NAT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, KNOT Offshore Partners LP (KNOP) trades at 7.
6x forward P/E versus 10. 4x for Nordic American Tankers Limited — 2. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KNOP: 44. 3% to $16. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — KNOP or NAT?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Nordic American Tankers Limited (NAT) offers the highest yield at 7. 1%, versus 2. 7% for KNOT Offshore Partners LP (KNOP).
09Is KNOP or NAT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Nordic American Tankers Limited (NAT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
27), 7. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NAT: -40. 4%, KNOP: +45. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KNOP and NAT?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: KNOP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NAT is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.