Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
KOF vs CCU vs COKE vs TAP vs PEP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Beverages - Alcoholic
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Beverages - Alcoholic
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
KOF vs CCU vs COKE vs TAP vs PEP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Beverages - Alcoholic | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Beverages - Alcoholic | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $2.23B | $2.22B | $14.87B | $8.10B | $213.59B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $292.72B | $2.88T | $7.49B | $11.19B | $93.92B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $23.85B | $115.38B | $579M | $-2.11B | $8.24B |
| Gross Margin | 45.6% | 44.4% | 39.3% | 37.8% | 54.1% |
| Operating Margin | 13.9% | 7.0% | 13.4% | -20.3% | 12.2% |
| Forward P/E | 0.8x | 0.0x | 26.1x | 9.2x | 18.0x |
| Total Debt | $82.68B | $1.33T | $3.00B | $6.30B | $49.90B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $28.07B | $520.66B | $282M | $897M | $9.16B |
KOF vs CCU vs COKE vs TAP vs PEP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.… (KOF) | 100 | 242.2 | +142.2% |
| Compañía Cervecería… (CCU) | 100 | 85.9 | -14.1% |
| Coca-Cola Consolida… (COKE) | 100 | 729.7 | +629.7% |
| Molson Coors Bevera… (TAP) | 100 | 113.6 | +13.6% |
| PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP) | 100 | 118.8 | +18.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KOF vs CCU vs COKE vs TAP vs PEP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KOF ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.42, yield 38.4%
- Beta 0.42, yield 38.4%, current ratio 1.12x
- 38.4% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs PEP's 3.6%
CCU is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.01 vs PEP's 5.53
- Lower P/E (0.0x vs 18.0x), PEG 0.01 vs 5.53
COKE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 4.8%, EPS growth -2.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.2%
- 10.1% 10Y total return vs PEP's 89.2%
- 4.8% revenue growth vs CCU's -4.7%
- +49.6% vs TAP's -20.8%
Among these 5 stocks, TAP doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
PEP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.03, current ratio 0.85x
- 8.8% margin vs TAP's -18.9%
- Beta 0.03 vs CCU's 0.81
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.8% revenue growth vs CCU's -4.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.0x vs 18.0x), PEG 0.01 vs 5.53 | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.8% margin vs TAP's -18.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.03 vs CCU's 0.81 | |
| Dividends | 38.4% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs PEP's 3.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +49.6% vs TAP's -20.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.4% ROA vs TAP's -8.9%, ROIC 34.2% vs -10.1% |
KOF vs CCU vs COKE vs TAP vs PEP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
KOF vs CCU vs COKE vs TAP vs PEP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
COKE leads in 2 of 6 categories
PEP leads 1 • KOF leads 1 • CCU leads 0 • TAP leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PEP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CCU is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.88T annually — 384.6x COKE's $7.5B. PEP is the more profitable business, keeping 8.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TAP's -18.9%. On growth, COKE holds the edge at +16.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $292.7B | $2.88T | $7.5B | $11.2B | $93.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $42.3B | $272.7B | $1.1B | -$1.5B | $14.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $23.9B | $115.4B | $579M | -$2.1B | $8.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $5.1B | $117.1B | $662M | $1.2B | $7.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +45.6% | +44.4% | +39.3% | +37.8% | +54.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +13.9% | +7.0% | +13.4% | -20.3% | +12.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +8.1% | +4.0% | +7.7% | -18.9% | +8.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.8% | +4.1% | +8.8% | +10.4% | +8.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.4% | -14.7% | +16.9% | +2.0% | +5.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -43.8% | -27.9% | +40.3% | +35.6% | +66.7% |
Valuation Metrics
KOF leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.8x trailing earnings, CCU trades at a 42% valuation discount to KOF's 30.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), COKE offers better value at 0.87x vs KOF's 8.19x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.2B | $2.2B | $14.9B | $8.1B | $213.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.4B | $3.1B | $17.6B | $13.5B | $254.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 30.93x | 17.79x | 26.08x | -3.98x | 26.05x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.83x | 0.02x | — | 9.17x | 18.05x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 8.19x | 5.77x | 0.87x | — | 7.98x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 1.71x | 7.98x | 15.04x | — | 17.78x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.13x | 0.72x | 2.06x | 0.73x | 2.27x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.25x | 1.23x | — | 0.80x | 10.43x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 6.72x | 21.67x | 23.80x | 7.58x | 27.84x |
Profitability & Efficiency
COKE leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
COKE delivers a 122.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $123 in annual profit, vs $-19 for TAP. KOF carries lower financial leverage with a 0.54x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PEP's 2.43x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CCU scores 6/9 vs TAP's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +20.9% | +7.1% | +122.9% | -18.6% | +40.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +9.9% | +3.1% | +11.4% | -8.9% | +7.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +15.0% | +6.3% | +34.2% | -10.1% | +14.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +16.6% | +6.7% | +25.4% | -11.6% | +16.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.54x | 0.82x | — | 0.60x | 2.43x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $54.6B | $806.9B | $2.7B | $5.4B | $40.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $28.1B | $520.7B | $282M | $897M | $9.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $82.7B | $1.33T | $3.0B | $6.3B | $49.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 7.15x | 2.65x | 14.03x | -9.99x | 10.34x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
COKE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in COKE five years ago would be worth $63,089 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,298 for CCU. Over the past 12 months, COKE leads with a +49.6% total return vs TAP's -20.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors COKE at 40.6% vs TAP's -9.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.8% | -4.3% | +18.9% | -8.0% | +10.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +16.7% | -19.6% | +49.6% | -20.8% | +22.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +28.8% | -23.0% | +177.9% | -24.8% | -10.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +157.6% | -17.0% | +530.9% | -14.1% | +24.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +59.5% | -9.7% | +1005.2% | -41.4% | +89.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.8% | -8.3% | +40.6% | -9.1% | -3.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TAP and PEP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TAP is the less volatile stock with a -0.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CCU's 0.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PEP currently trades 91.1% from its 52-week high vs TAP's 74.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.42x | 0.81x | 0.18x | -0.01x | 0.03x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $116.36 | $15.57 | $219.65 | $57.57 | $171.48 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $80.22 | $10.71 | $105.21 | $40.64 | $127.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.1% | +77.3% | +80.9% | +74.9% | +91.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.6 | 54.6 | 61.2 | 47.2 | 49.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 171K | 201K | 499K | 2.9M | 5.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — KOF and PEP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: KOF as "Buy", CCU as "Hold", COKE as "Hold", TAP as "Hold", PEP as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 12.0% upside for TAP (target: $48) vs 4.7% for KOF (target: $111). For income investors, KOF offers the higher dividend yield at 38.43% vs COKE's 0.58%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $111.00 | — | — | $48.30 | $174.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 7 | 1 | 37 | 45 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +38.4% | +3.7% | +0.6% | +4.5% | +3.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 8 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 25 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $702.49 | $403.10 | $1.03 | $1.92 | $5.57 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +17.5% | +8.0% | +0.5% |
COKE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). PEP leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
KOF vs CCU vs COKE vs TAP vs PEP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KOF or CCU or COKE or TAP or PEP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc.
(COKE) is the stronger pick with 4. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 7% for Compañía Cervecerías Unidas S. A. (CCU). Compañía Cervecerías Unidas S. A. (CCU) offers the better valuation at 17. 8x trailing P/E (0. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Coca-Cola FEMSA, S. A. B. de C. V. (KOF) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KOF or CCU or COKE or TAP or PEP?
On trailing P/E, Compañía Cervecerías Unidas S.
A. (CCU) is the cheapest at 17. 8x versus Coca-Cola FEMSA, S. A. B. de C. V. at 30. 9x. On forward P/E, Compañía Cervecerías Unidas S. A. is actually cheaper at 0. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Compañía Cervecerías Unidas S. A. wins at 0. 01x versus PepsiCo, Inc. 's 5. 53x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KOF or CCU or COKE or TAP or PEP?
Over the past 5 years, Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc.
(COKE) delivered a total return of +530. 9%, compared to -17. 0% for Compañía Cervecerías Unidas S. A. (CCU). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: COKE returned +1005% versus TAP's -41. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KOF or CCU or COKE or TAP or PEP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Molson Coors Beverage Company (TAP) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
01β versus Compañía Cervecerías Unidas S. A. 's 0. 81β — meaning CCU is approximately -6795% more volatile than TAP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Coca-Cola FEMSA, S. A. B. de C. V. (KOF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 54% versus 2% for PepsiCo, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KOF or CCU or COKE or TAP or PEP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc.
(COKE) is pulling ahead at 4. 8% versus -4. 7% for Compañía Cervecerías Unidas S. A. (CCU). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. grew EPS -2. 6% year-over-year, compared to -302. 8% for Molson Coors Beverage Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, KOF leads at 8. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KOF or CCU or COKE or TAP or PEP?
PepsiCo, Inc.
(PEP) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 8% net margin versus -19. 2% for Molson Coors Beverage Company — meaning it keeps 8. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KOF leads at 13. 9% versus -21. 0% for TAP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PEP leads at 54. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KOF or CCU or COKE or TAP or PEP more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Compañía Cervecerías Unidas S. A. (CCU) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 01x versus PepsiCo, Inc. 's 5. 53x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Compañía Cervecerías Unidas S. A. (CCU) trades at 0. 0x forward P/E versus 18. 0x for PepsiCo, Inc. — 18. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TAP: 12. 0% to $48. 30.
08Which pays a better dividend — KOF or CCU or COKE or TAP or PEP?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Coca-Cola FEMSA, S. A. B. de C. V. (KOF) offers the highest yield at 38. 4%, versus 0. 6% for Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. (COKE).
09Is KOF or CCU or COKE or TAP or PEP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc.
(COKE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 18), 0. 6% yield, +1005% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (COKE: +1005%, CCU: -9. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KOF and CCU and COKE and TAP and PEP?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: KOF is a small-cap income-oriented stock; CCU is a small-cap deep-value stock; COKE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; TAP is a small-cap income-oriented stock; PEP is a large-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.