Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
KOS vs EGY vs APA vs DVN vs COP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
KOS vs EGY vs APA vs DVN vs COP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| Market Cap | $1.46B | $623M | $12.81B | $28.19B | $140.02B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.37B | $249M | $8.61B | $12.24B | $58.31B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-815M | $-143M | $1.53B | $2.15B | $7.32B |
| Gross Margin | 0.7% | 18.9% | 53.9% | 21.8% | 29.2% |
| Operating Margin | -7.2% | 1.7% | 34.6% | 18.9% | 18.3% |
| Forward P/E | 160.6x | 22.4x | 6.6x | 8.6x | 13.3x |
| Total Debt | $3.06B | $128M | $4.81B | $8.78B | $23.44B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $92M | $59M | $516M | $1.43B | $6.50B |
KOS vs EGY vs APA vs DVN vs COP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kosmos Energy Ltd. (KOS) | 100 | 158.8 | +58.8% |
| VAALCO Energy, Inc. (EGY) | 100 | 602.9 | +502.9% |
| APA Corporation (APA) | 100 | 335.9 | +235.9% |
| Devon Energy Corpor… (DVN) | 100 | 419.6 | +319.6% |
| ConocoPhillips (COP) | 100 | 272.4 | +172.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KOS vs EGY vs APA vs DVN vs COP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KOS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
EGY ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.16, yield 4.3%
- 5.4% 10Y total return vs COP's 233.4%
- 4.3% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs APA's 2.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
APA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Lower P/E (6.6x vs 13.3x)
- 17.8% margin vs KOS's -59.4%
- +140.6% vs COP's +34.7%
DVN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 10.0%, EPS growth -8.1%, 3Y rev CAGR -4.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.05, Low D/E 56.6%, current ratio 0.98x
- 10.0% revenue growth vs EGY's -25.0%
- Beta 0.05 vs KOS's 0.49, lower leverage
COP is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 0.08, yield 2.8%, current ratio 1.30x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.0% revenue growth vs EGY's -25.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.6x vs 13.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.8% margin vs KOS's -59.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.05 vs KOS's 0.49, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.3% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs APA's 2.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +140.6% vs COP's +34.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.1% ROA vs KOS's -16.5%, ROIC 12.3% vs -5.5% |
KOS vs EGY vs APA vs DVN vs COP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
KOS vs EGY vs APA vs DVN vs COP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
APA leads in 3 of 6 categories
EGY leads 1 • KOS leads 0 • DVN leads 0 • COP leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
APA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
COP is the larger business by revenue, generating $58.3B annually — 234.2x EGY's $249M. APA is the more profitable business, keeping 17.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KOS's -59.4%. On growth, KOS holds the edge at +27.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.4B | $249M | $8.6B | $12.2B | $58.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $227M | $102M | $5.3B | $5.0B | $22.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$815M | -$143M | $1.5B | $2.1B | $7.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $17M | $44M | $1.5B | $2.1B | $18.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +0.7% | +18.9% | +53.9% | +21.8% | +29.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -7.2% | +1.7% | +34.6% | +18.9% | +18.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -59.4% | -57.4% | +17.8% | +17.6% | +12.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.3% | +17.5% | +17.2% | +16.8% | +31.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +27.8% | -100.0% | -11.7% | -99.9% | -2.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -95.7% | -13.2% | +32.6% | -100.0% | -20.2% |
Valuation Metrics
APA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.1x trailing earnings, APA trades at a 50% valuation discount to COP's 18.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, APA's 3.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KOS's 13.7x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.5B | $623M | $12.8B | $28.2B | $140.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.4B | $693M | $17.1B | $35.5B | $157.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.97x | -14.95x | 9.08x | 10.80x | 18.09x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 160.56x | 22.36x | 6.58x | 8.62x | 13.29x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.74x | 4.43x | 3.24x | 4.79x | 6.77x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.13x | 1.74x | 1.44x | 1.65x | 2.38x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.62x | 1.40x | 1.86x | 1.84x | 2.23x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 7.20x | 9.04x | 8.35x |
Profitability & Efficiency
APA leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
APA delivers a 21.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $-110 for KOS. EGY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.29x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KOS's 5.80x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), COP scores 6/9 vs EGY's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -110.1% | -31.7% | +21.8% | +18.6% | +11.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -16.5% | -15.3% | +8.4% | +9.1% | +6.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -5.5% | +6.8% | +17.8% | +12.3% | +10.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -6.1% | +6.2% | +16.7% | +13.8% | +10.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 5.80x | 0.29x | 0.69x | 0.57x | 0.36x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.0B | $70M | $4.3B | $7.3B | $16.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $92M | $59M | $516M | $1.4B | $6.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.1B | $128M | $4.8B | $8.8B | $23.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.38x | 4.10x | 14.22x | 7.98x | 9.42x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
EGY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EGY five years ago would be worth $25,544 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,175 for KOS. Over the past 12 months, APA leads with a +140.6% total return vs COP's +34.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EGY at 16.6% vs KOS's -23.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +224.7% | +65.1% | +44.9% | +20.4% | +19.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +90.1% | +91.7% | +140.6% | +52.9% | +34.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -54.4% | +58.4% | +18.6% | -2.0% | +23.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -8.3% | +155.4% | +87.4% | +120.1% | +131.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -32.8% | +535.1% | -15.0% | +99.0% | +233.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -23.0% | +16.6% | +5.9% | -0.7% | +7.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — EGY and APA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
APA is the less volatile stock with a -0.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KOS's 0.49 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EGY currently trades 89.0% from its 52-week high vs APA's 79.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.49x | 0.16x | -0.02x | 0.05x | 0.08x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.32 | $6.72 | $45.66 | $52.71 | $135.87 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.84 | $3.14 | $15.20 | $29.70 | $84.28 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +87.0% | +89.0% | +79.4% | +86.0% | +84.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.0 | 48.3 | 48.3 | 43.5 | 43.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 26.7M | 1.6M | 9.1M | 15.3M | 9.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — EGY and APA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: KOS as "Buy", EGY as "Buy", APA as "Hold", DVN as "Buy", COP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 22.1% upside for EGY (target: $7) vs -16.3% for KOS (target: $2). For income investors, EGY offers the higher dividend yield at 4.26% vs DVN's 2.17%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $2.42 | $7.30 | $32.46 | $53.78 | $127.07 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 26 | 5 | 51 | 64 | 52 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +4.3% | +2.8% | +2.2% | +2.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.25 | $1.00 | $0.98 | $3.19 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% | +2.2% | +3.7% | +3.6% |
APA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). EGY leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
KOS vs EGY vs APA vs DVN vs COP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KOS or EGY or APA or DVN or COP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Devon Energy Corporation (DVN) is the stronger pick with 10.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -25. 0% for VAALCO Energy, Inc. (EGY). APA Corporation (APA) offers the better valuation at 9. 1x trailing P/E (6. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Kosmos Energy Ltd. (KOS) a "Buy" — based on 26 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KOS or EGY or APA or DVN or COP?
On trailing P/E, APA Corporation (APA) is the cheapest at 9.
1x versus ConocoPhillips at 18. 1x. On forward P/E, APA Corporation is actually cheaper at 6. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KOS or EGY or APA or DVN or COP?
Over the past 5 years, VAALCO Energy, Inc.
(EGY) delivered a total return of +155. 4%, compared to -8. 3% for Kosmos Energy Ltd. (KOS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EGY returned +535. 1% versus KOS's -32. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KOS or EGY or APA or DVN or COP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), APA Corporation (APA) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
02β versus Kosmos Energy Ltd. 's 0. 49β — meaning KOS is approximately -2496% more volatile than APA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, VAALCO Energy, Inc. (EGY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 29% versus 6% for Kosmos Energy Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KOS or EGY or APA or DVN or COP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Devon Energy Corporation (DVN) is pulling ahead at 10.
0% versus -25. 0% for VAALCO Energy, Inc. (EGY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: APA Corporation grew EPS 75. 0% year-over-year, compared to -467. 5% for Kosmos Energy Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, EGY leads at 0. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KOS or EGY or APA or DVN or COP?
APA Corporation (APA) is the more profitable company, earning 16.
1% net margin versus -53. 9% for Kosmos Energy Ltd. — meaning it keeps 16. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: APA leads at 30. 8% versus -20. 9% for KOS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — APA leads at 37. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KOS or EGY or APA or DVN or COP more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, APA Corporation (APA) trades at 6.
6x forward P/E versus 160. 6x for Kosmos Energy Ltd. — 154. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EGY: 22. 1% to $7. 30.
08Which pays a better dividend — KOS or EGY or APA or DVN or COP?
In this comparison, EGY (4.
3% yield), COP (2. 8% yield), APA (2. 8% yield), DVN (2. 2% yield) pay a dividend. KOS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is KOS or EGY or APA or DVN or COP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, VAALCO Energy, Inc.
(EGY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 16), 4. 3% yield, +535. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EGY: +535. 1%, KOS: -32. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KOS and EGY and APA and DVN and COP?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: KOS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; EGY is a small-cap income-oriented stock; APA is a mid-cap deep-value stock; DVN is a mid-cap deep-value stock; COP is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. EGY, APA, DVN, COP pay a dividend while KOS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.