Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

KRC vs BXP vs HIW vs CUZ vs DEA

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
KRC
Kilroy Realty Corporation

REIT - Office

Real EstateNYSE • US
Market Cap$4.10B
5Y Perf.-39.5%
BXP
BXP, Inc.

REIT - Office

Real EstateNYSE • US
Market Cap$9.43B
5Y Perf.-30.8%
HIW
Highwoods Properties, Inc.

REIT - Office

Real EstateNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.82B
5Y Perf.-33.2%
CUZ
Cousins Properties Incorporated

REIT - Office

Real EstateNYSE • US
Market Cap$4.32B
5Y Perf.-15.6%
DEA
Easterly Government Properties, Inc.

REIT - Office

Real EstateNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.08B
5Y Perf.-62.8%

KRC vs BXP vs HIW vs CUZ vs DEA — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
KRC logoKRC
BXP logoBXP
HIW logoHIW
CUZ logoCUZ
DEA logoDEA
IndustryREIT - OfficeREIT - OfficeREIT - OfficeREIT - OfficeREIT - Office
Market Cap$4.10B$9.43B$2.82B$4.32B$1.08B
Revenue (TTM)$1.11B$3.48B$820M$1.01B$344M
Net Income (TTM)$276M$277M$93M$-5M$15M
Gross Margin67.0%60.6%67.4%57.6%49.7%
Operating Margin28.4%42.3%25.6%22.3%24.9%
Forward P/E83.5x35.7x39.6x95.8x69.5x
Total Debt$4.84B$17.36B$3.64B$3.68B$1.68B
Cash & Equiv.$179M$1.48B$27M$6M$23M

KRC vs BXP vs HIW vs CUZ vs DEALong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

KRC
BXP
HIW
CUZ
DEA
StockMay 20May 26Return
Kilroy Realty Corpo… (KRC)10060.5-39.5%
BXP, Inc. (BXP)10069.2-30.8%
Highwoods Propertie… (HIW)10066.8-33.2%
Cousins Properties … (CUZ)10084.4-15.6%
Easterly Government… (DEA)10037.2-62.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: KRC vs BXP vs HIW vs CUZ vs DEA

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: DEA leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for capital preservation and lower volatility and dividend income and shareholder returns. Kilroy Realty Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. BXP and CUZ also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
KRC
Kilroy Realty Corporation
The Real Estate Income Play

KRC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.

  • 24.8% margin vs CUZ's -0.5%
  • 2.5% ROA vs CUZ's -0.1%, ROIC 2.3% vs 2.0%
Best for: quality and efficiency
BXP
BXP, Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play

BXP ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.

  • Lower P/E (35.7x vs 95.8x)
Best for: value
HIW
Highwoods Properties, Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play

HIW is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.76, current ratio 42.45x
  • Beta 0.76, yield 7.7%, current ratio 42.45x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
CUZ
Cousins Properties Incorporated
The Real Estate Income Play

CUZ is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 16.0%, EPS growth -20.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.2%
  • 25.3% 10Y total return vs HIW's -6.8%
  • 16.0% FFO/revenue growth vs HIW's -2.4%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
DEA
Easterly Government Properties, Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play

DEA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.51, yield 9.0%
  • Beta 0.51 vs BXP's 0.96, lower leverage
  • 9.0% yield, vs CUZ's 4.9%
  • +25.0% vs HIW's -5.2%
Best for: income & stability
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCUZ logoCUZ16.0% FFO/revenue growth vs HIW's -2.4%
ValueBXP logoBXPLower P/E (35.7x vs 95.8x)
Quality / MarginsKRC logoKRC24.8% margin vs CUZ's -0.5%
Stability / SafetyDEA logoDEABeta 0.51 vs BXP's 0.96, lower leverage
DividendsDEA logoDEA9.0% yield, vs CUZ's 4.9%
Momentum (1Y)DEA logoDEA+25.0% vs HIW's -5.2%
Efficiency (ROA)KRC logoKRC2.5% ROA vs CUZ's -0.1%, ROIC 2.3% vs 2.0%

KRC vs BXP vs HIW vs CUZ vs DEA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

KRCKilroy Realty Corporation
FY 2019
Rental
98.7%$826M
Real Estate, Other
1.3%$11M
Tenant Reimbursements
0.0%$0
BXPBXP, Inc.
FY 2025
Parking and Other
58.2%$143M
Hotel
20.3%$50M
Management Service
14.9%$37M
Real Estate, Other
6.7%$16M
HIWHighwoods Properties, Inc.
FY 2025
Raleigh, NC
23.9%$181M
Nashville, TN
20.7%$157M
Atlanta, GA
19.1%$145M
Charlotte, NC
12.3%$93M
Tampa, FL
11.6%$88M
Orlando, FL
7.5%$57M
Richmond, VA
4.8%$36M
CUZCousins Properties Incorporated
FY 2025
Rental Properties
77.3%$981M
Variable Rental Revenue
21.7%$275M
Fee And Other Revenue
1.0%$13M
DEAEasterly Government Properties, Inc.
FY 2025
Real Estate, Other
50.7%$6M
Tenant Reimbursements
49.3%$6M

KRC vs BXP vs HIW vs CUZ vs DEA — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLBXPLAGGINGCUZ

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — BXP and DEA each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

BXP is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.5B annually — 10.1x DEA's $344M. KRC is the more profitable business, keeping 24.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CUZ's -0.5%. On growth, DEA holds the edge at +10.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricKRC logoKRCKilroy Realty Cor…BXP logoBXPBXP, Inc.HIW logoHIWHighwoods Propert…CUZ logoCUZCousins Propertie…DEA logoDEAEasterly Governme…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.1B$3.5B$820M$1.0B$344M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$661M$2.4B$511M$646M$203M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$276M$277M$93M-$5M$15M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$7M$690M$318M-$122M$262M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+67.0%+60.6%+67.4%+57.6%+49.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+28.4%+42.3%+25.6%+22.3%+24.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+24.8%+8.0%+11.4%-0.5%+4.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+0.6%+19.8%+38.7%-12.2%+76.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-4.9%+2.2%+6.8%+5.1%+10.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-78.0%+2.1%-67.8%-2.3%-55.4%
Evenly matched — BXP and DEA each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

BXP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 14.9x trailing earnings, KRC trades at a 86% valuation discount to CUZ's 109.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BXP's 8.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DEA's 13.9x.

MetricKRC logoKRCKilroy Realty Cor…BXP logoBXPBXP, Inc.HIW logoHIWHighwoods Propert…CUZ logoCUZCousins Propertie…DEA logoDEAEasterly Governme…
Market CapShares × price$4.1B$9.4B$2.8B$4.3B$1.1B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$8.8B$25.3B$6.4B$8.0B$2.7B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS14.90x34.17x17.63x109.46x80.31x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.83.54x35.65x39.58x95.84x69.52x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.04x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple13.27x8.89x12.75x12.52x13.85x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.68x2.71x3.50x4.35x3.21x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.73x1.23x1.16x0.94x0.77x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF13.68x16.93x32.01x4.16x
BXP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — KRC and BXP each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

KRC delivers a 4.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-0 for CUZ. CUZ carries lower financial leverage with a 0.78x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BXP's 2.26x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BXP scores 6/9 vs DEA's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricKRC logoKRCKilroy Realty Cor…BXP logoBXPBXP, Inc.HIW logoHIWHighwoods Propert…CUZ logoCUZCousins Propertie…DEA logoDEAEasterly Governme…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+4.9%+3.6%+3.8%-0.1%+1.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+2.5%+1.1%+1.5%-0.1%+0.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital+2.3%+6.1%+2.7%+2.0%+2.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+3.0%+7.8%+3.5%+2.8%+3.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–956644
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.86x2.26x1.49x0.78x1.23x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$4.7B$15.9B$3.6B$3.7B$1.7B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$179M$1.5B$27M$6M$23M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$4.8B$17.4B$3.6B$3.7B$1.7B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense2.51x1.59x2.07x1.18x
Evenly matched — KRC and BXP each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — KRC and CUZ and DEA each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CUZ five years ago would be worth $9,039 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,297 for DEA. Over the past 12 months, DEA leads with a +25.0% total return vs HIW's -5.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KRC at 13.5% vs DEA's -5.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricKRC logoKRCKilroy Realty Cor…BXP logoBXPBXP, Inc.HIW logoHIWHighwoods Propert…CUZ logoCUZCousins Propertie…DEA logoDEAEasterly Governme…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-7.7%-11.3%+0.7%+3.8%+13.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+19.1%-2.4%-5.2%-0.4%+25.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+46.3%+38.2%+44.3%+44.5%-16.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-33.2%-27.7%-20.1%-9.6%-37.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-14.3%-27.8%-6.8%+25.3%-8.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+13.5%+11.4%+13.0%+13.1%-5.7%
Evenly matched — KRC and CUZ and DEA each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

DEA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

DEA is the less volatile stock with a 0.51 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BXP's 0.96 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DEA currently trades 93.4% from its 52-week high vs BXP's 75.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricKRC logoKRCKilroy Realty Cor…BXP logoBXPBXP, Inc.HIW logoHIWHighwoods Propert…CUZ logoCUZCousins Propertie…DEA logoDEAEasterly Governme…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.83x0.96x0.76x0.80x0.51x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$45.03$79.33$32.76$30.81$24.94
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$27.36$49.72$20.45$21.03$19.82
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+76.8%+75.0%+78.0%+85.3%+93.4%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10070.363.769.673.454.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded2.1M2.4M1.3M1.9M381K
DEA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — CUZ and DEA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: KRC as "Hold", BXP as "Buy", HIW as "Hold", CUZ as "Buy", DEA as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 21.3% upside for BXP (target: $72) vs -29.5% for DEA (target: $16). For income investors, DEA offers the higher dividend yield at 9.01% vs CUZ's 4.87%.

MetricKRC logoKRCKilroy Realty Cor…BXP logoBXPBXP, Inc.HIW logoHIWHighwoods Propert…CUZ logoCUZCousins Propertie…DEA logoDEAEasterly Governme…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyHoldBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$37.71$72.10$27.00$29.50$16.41
# AnalystsCovering analysts284222168
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+6.3%+6.8%+7.7%+4.9%+9.0%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises00010
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.17$4.05$1.96$1.28$2.10
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.2%0.0%+0.1%0.0%0.0%
Evenly matched — CUZ and DEA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

BXP leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). DEA leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 4 tied.

Best OverallBXP, Inc. (BXP)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

KRC vs BXP vs HIW vs CUZ vs DEA: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is KRC or BXP or HIW or CUZ or DEA a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Cousins Properties Incorporated (CUZ) is the stronger pick with 16.

0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 4% for Highwoods Properties, Inc. (HIW). Kilroy Realty Corporation (KRC) offers the better valuation at 14. 9x trailing P/E (83. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate BXP, Inc. (BXP) a "Buy" — based on 42 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — KRC or BXP or HIW or CUZ or DEA?

On trailing P/E, Kilroy Realty Corporation (KRC) is the cheapest at 14.

9x versus Cousins Properties Incorporated at 109. 5x. On forward P/E, BXP, Inc. is actually cheaper at 35. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — KRC or BXP or HIW or CUZ or DEA?

Over the past 5 years, Cousins Properties Incorporated (CUZ) delivered a total return of -9.

6%, compared to -37. 0% for Easterly Government Properties, Inc. (DEA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CUZ returned +25. 3% versus BXP's -27. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — KRC or BXP or HIW or CUZ or DEA?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Easterly Government Properties, Inc.

(DEA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 51β versus BXP, Inc. 's 0. 96β — meaning BXP is approximately 88% more volatile than DEA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cousins Properties Incorporated (CUZ) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 78% versus 2% for BXP, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — KRC or BXP or HIW or CUZ or DEA?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cousins Properties Incorporated (CUZ) is pulling ahead at 16.

0% versus -2. 4% for Highwoods Properties, Inc. (HIW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: BXP, Inc. grew EPS 1833% year-over-year, compared to -37. 0% for Easterly Government Properties, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CUZ leads at 9. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — KRC or BXP or HIW or CUZ or DEA?

Kilroy Realty Corporation (KRC) is the more profitable company, earning 24.

8% net margin versus 3. 9% for Easterly Government Properties, Inc. — meaning it keeps 24. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BXP leads at 55. 7% versus 22. 4% for CUZ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HIW leads at 67. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is KRC or BXP or HIW or CUZ or DEA more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, BXP, Inc.

(BXP) trades at 35. 7x forward P/E versus 95. 8x for Cousins Properties Incorporated — 60. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BXP: 21. 3% to $72. 10.

08

Which pays a better dividend — KRC or BXP or HIW or CUZ or DEA?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Easterly Government Properties, Inc. (DEA) offers the highest yield at 9. 0%, versus 4. 9% for Cousins Properties Incorporated (CUZ).

09

Is KRC or BXP or HIW or CUZ or DEA better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Easterly Government Properties, Inc.

(DEA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 51), 9. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (DEA: -8. 7%, BXP: -27. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between KRC and BXP and HIW and CUZ and DEA?

Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: KRC is a small-cap deep-value stock; BXP is a small-cap income-oriented stock; HIW is a small-cap deep-value stock; CUZ is a small-cap high-growth stock; DEA is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

KRC

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 14%
  • Dividend Yield > 2.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BXP

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 2.7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HIW

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CUZ

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 34%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

DEA

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 29%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform KRC and BXP and HIW and CUZ and DEA on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(KRC: -4.9% · BXP: 2.2%)
Net Margin>
%
(KRC: 24.8% · BXP: 8.0%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(KRC: 14.9x · BXP: 34.2x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.