REIT - Mortgage
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
KREF vs STWD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Mortgage
KREF vs STWD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Mortgage |
| Market Cap | $422M | $6.93B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $442M | $1.89B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-104M | $412M |
| Gross Margin | 87.1% | 57.2% |
| Operating Margin | 48.0% | 51.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 10.2x |
| Total Debt | $4.69B | $22.20B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $85M | $499M |
KREF vs STWD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| KKR Real Estate Fin… (KREF) | 100 | 40.6 | -59.4% |
| Starwood Property T… (STWD) | 100 | 138.2 | +38.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KREF vs STWD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KREF is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.87, yield 15.2%
- Better valuation composite
- 15.2% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend
STWD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -7.9%, EPS growth 8.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.6%
- 90.8% 10Y total return vs KREF's -9.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.45, current ratio 0.36x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -7.9% FFO/revenue growth vs KREF's -22.7% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 21.8% margin vs KREF's -23.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.45 vs KREF's 0.87, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 15.2% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +6.5% vs KREF's -16.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.7% ROA vs KREF's -1.6%, ROIC 4.8% vs 3.4% |
KREF vs STWD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
KREF vs STWD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
STWD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
STWD is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.9B annually — 4.3x KREF's $442M. STWD is the more profitable business, keeping 21.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KREF's -23.6%. On growth, STWD holds the edge at +12.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $442M | $1.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $140M | $1.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$104M | $412M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $65M | $957M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +87.1% | +57.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +48.0% | +51.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -23.6% | +21.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +14.8% | +50.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -13.8% | +12.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.4% | +114.3% |
Valuation Metrics
KREF leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, KREF's 18.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than STWD's 18.9x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $422M | $6.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.0B | $28.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -6.26x | 15.02x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 10.20x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 14.82x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 18.35x | 18.94x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.92x | 3.69x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.36x | 0.83x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 6.33x | 7.09x |
Profitability & Efficiency
STWD leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
STWD delivers a 5.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-8 for KREF. STWD carries lower financial leverage with a 2.96x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KREF's 3.83x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), STWD scores 6/9 vs KREF's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -8.4% | +5.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.6% | +0.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.4% | +4.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.5% | +2.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.83x | 2.96x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4.6B | $21.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $85M | $499M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.7B | $22.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.84x | 1.12x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
STWD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in STWD five years ago would be worth $11,132 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,401 for KREF. Over the past 12 months, STWD leads with a +6.5% total return vs KREF's -16.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors STWD at 12.9% vs KREF's -0.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -17.6% | +2.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -16.7% | +6.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -0.8% | +43.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -36.0% | +11.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -9.2% | +90.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -0.3% | +12.9% |
Risk & Volatility
STWD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
STWD is the less volatile stock with a 0.45 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KREF's 0.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. STWD currently trades 87.1% from its 52-week high vs KREF's 65.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.87x | 0.45x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.98 | $21.05 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.29 | $16.90 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +65.8% | +87.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.1 | 56.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.6M | 2.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates KREF as "Buy" and STWD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 6.5% upside for KREF (target: $7) vs 3.7% for STWD (target: $19). KREF is the only dividend payer here at 15.23% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $7.00 | $19.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 21 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +15.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.00 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +10.3% | 0.0% |
STWD leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). KREF leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
KREF vs STWD: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KREF or STWD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Starwood Property Trust, Inc.
(STWD) is the stronger pick with -7. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -22. 7% for KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc. (KREF). Starwood Property Trust, Inc. (STWD) offers the better valuation at 15. 0x trailing P/E (10. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc. (KREF) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — KREF or STWD?
Over the past 5 years, Starwood Property Trust, Inc.
(STWD) delivered a total return of +11. 3%, compared to -36. 0% for KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc. (KREF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: STWD returned +90. 8% versus KREF's -9. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — KREF or STWD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Starwood Property Trust, Inc.
(STWD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 45β versus KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc. 's 0. 87β — meaning KREF is approximately 93% more volatile than STWD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Starwood Property Trust, Inc. (STWD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 4% for KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — KREF or STWD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Starwood Property Trust, Inc.
(STWD) is pulling ahead at -7. 9% versus -22. 7% for KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc. (KREF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Starwood Property Trust, Inc. grew EPS 8. 9% year-over-year, compared to -652. 6% for KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, STWD leads at 6. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — KREF or STWD?
Starwood Property Trust, Inc.
(STWD) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 9% net margin versus -10. 3% for KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc. — meaning it keeps 21. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: STWD leads at 76. 2% versus 59. 3% for KREF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KREF leads at 88. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is KREF or STWD more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KREF: 6.
5% to $7. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — KREF or STWD?
In this comparison, KREF (15.
2% yield) pays a dividend. STWD does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is KREF or STWD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc.
(KREF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 87), 15. 2% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KREF: -9. 2%, STWD: +90. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between KREF and STWD?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: KREF is a small-cap income-oriented stock; STWD is a small-cap deep-value stock. KREF pays a dividend while STWD does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.