REIT - Retail
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
KRG vs BRX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Retail
KRG vs BRX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Retail | REIT - Retail |
| Market Cap | $5.38B | $9.24B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $827M | $1.39B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $286M | $444M |
| Gross Margin | 52.3% | 78.5% |
| Operating Margin | 23.0% | 37.4% |
| Forward P/E | 80.4x | 29.8x |
| Total Debt | $3.37B | $5.87B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $37M | $362M |
KRG vs BRX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kite Realty Group T… (KRG) | 100 | 274.7 | +174.7% |
| Brixmor Property Gr… (BRX) | 100 | 269.6 | +169.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KRG vs BRX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KRG is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.56, yield 4.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.56, current ratio 1.44x
- Beta 0.56, yield 4.2%, current ratio 1.44x
BRX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 6.7%, EPS growth 12.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.0%
- 54.4% 10Y total return vs KRG's 31.4%
- 6.7% FFO/revenue growth vs KRG's 0.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.7% FFO/revenue growth vs KRG's 0.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (29.8x vs 80.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 34.6% margin vs BRX's 32.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.46 vs KRG's 0.56 | |
| Dividends | 4.2% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs BRX's 3.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +25.3% vs BRX's +23.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.0% ROA vs KRG's 4.3%, ROIC 4.6% vs 2.3% |
KRG vs BRX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
KRG vs BRX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BRX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BRX is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.4B annually — 1.7x KRG's $827M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 34.6% (KRG) to 32.0% (BRX). On growth, BRX holds the edge at +5.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $827M | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $553M | $937M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $286M | $444M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $255M | $663M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +52.3% | +78.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +23.0% | +37.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +34.6% | +32.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +30.9% | +47.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -9.5% | +5.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -45.5% | +78.3% |
Valuation Metrics
KRG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.2x trailing earnings, KRG trades at a 20% valuation discount to BRX's 24.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, KRG's 15.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BRX's 16.1x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.4B | $9.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $8.7B | $14.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 19.19x | 24.10x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 80.39x | 29.77x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.21x | 16.06x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.34x | 6.74x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.78x | 3.08x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 19.37x | 14.17x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — KRG and BRX each lead in 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BRX delivers a 14.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $9 for KRG. KRG carries lower financial leverage with a 1.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BRX's 1.95x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.9% | +14.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.3% | +5.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.3% | +4.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.0% | +6.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.06x | 1.95x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.3B | $5.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $37M | $362M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.4B | $5.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.51x | 2.72x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BRX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BRX five years ago would be worth $16,241 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $15,005 for KRG. Over the past 12 months, KRG leads with a +25.3% total return vs BRX's +23.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BRX at 16.2% vs KRG's 13.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +14.3% | +18.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +25.3% | +23.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +44.2% | +56.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +50.0% | +62.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +31.4% | +54.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +13.0% | +16.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KRG and BRX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BRX is the less volatile stock with a 0.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KRG's 0.56 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KRG currently trades 98.7% from its 52-week high vs BRX's 95.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.56x | 0.46x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $26.82 | $31.49 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $20.86 | $24.38 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.7% | +95.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.9 | 49.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.7M | 2.5M |
Analyst Outlook
KRG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates KRG as "Hold" and BRX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 2.9% upside for BRX (target: $31) vs -4.3% for KRG (target: $25). For income investors, KRG offers the higher dividend yield at 4.16% vs BRX's 3.82%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $25.33 | $31.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 25 | 30 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.2% | +3.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.10 | $1.15 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.6% | +0.0% |
BRX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). KRG leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
KRG vs BRX: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KRG or BRX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Brixmor Property Group Inc.
(BRX) is the stronger pick with 6. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 7% for Kite Realty Group Trust (KRG). Kite Realty Group Trust (KRG) offers the better valuation at 19. 2x trailing P/E (80. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Brixmor Property Group Inc. (BRX) a "Buy" — based on 30 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KRG or BRX?
On trailing P/E, Kite Realty Group Trust (KRG) is the cheapest at 19.
2x versus Brixmor Property Group Inc. at 24. 1x. On forward P/E, Brixmor Property Group Inc. is actually cheaper at 29. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KRG or BRX?
Over the past 5 years, Brixmor Property Group Inc.
(BRX) delivered a total return of +62. 4%, compared to +50. 0% for Kite Realty Group Trust (KRG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BRX returned +54. 4% versus KRG's +31. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KRG or BRX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Brixmor Property Group Inc.
(BRX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 46β versus Kite Realty Group Trust's 0. 56β — meaning KRG is approximately 22% more volatile than BRX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kite Realty Group Trust (KRG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 106% versus 195% for Brixmor Property Group Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KRG or BRX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Brixmor Property Group Inc.
(BRX) is pulling ahead at 6. 7% versus 0. 7% for Kite Realty Group Trust (KRG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kite Realty Group Trust grew EPS 73. 6% year-over-year, compared to 12. 6% for Brixmor Property Group Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BRX leads at 4. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KRG or BRX?
Kite Realty Group Trust (KRG) is the more profitable company, earning 35.
2% net margin versus 28. 2% for Brixmor Property Group Inc. — meaning it keeps 35. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BRX leads at 36. 7% versus 23. 1% for KRG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BRX leads at 75. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KRG or BRX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Brixmor Property Group Inc.
(BRX) trades at 29. 8x forward P/E versus 80. 4x for Kite Realty Group Trust — 50. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BRX: 2. 9% to $31. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — KRG or BRX?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Kite Realty Group Trust (KRG) offers the highest yield at 4. 2%, versus 3. 8% for Brixmor Property Group Inc. (BRX).
09Is KRG or BRX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Brixmor Property Group Inc.
(BRX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 46), 3. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BRX: +54. 4%, KRG: +31. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KRG and BRX?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.