KSPI vs NVDA vs AMD vs SE

For growth investors, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the stronger pick with 65.

5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 28. 8% for Sea Limited (SE). Joint Stock Company Kaspi. kz (KSPI) offers the better valuation at 7. 4x trailing P/E (0. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Joint Stock Company Kaspi. kz (KSPI) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Joint Stock Company Kaspi.

kz (KSPI) is the cheapest at 7. 4x versus Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. at 154. 1x. On forward P/E, Joint Stock Company Kaspi. kz is actually cheaper at 0. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Joint Stock Company Kaspi. kz wins at 0. 00x versus Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 's 11. 55x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) delivered a total return of +1329%, compared to -63.

1% for Sea Limited (SE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NVDA returned +239. 0% versus KSPI's +15. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Joint Stock Company Kaspi.

kz (KSPI) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 02β versus Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 's 2. 30β — meaning AMD is approximately 126% more volatile than KSPI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 49% for Sea Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is pulling ahead at 65.

5% versus 28. 8% for Sea Limited (SE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sea Limited grew EPS 192. 0% year-over-year, compared to 24. 0% for Joint Stock Company Kaspi. kz. Over a 3-year CAGR, NVDA leads at 100. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the more profitable company, earning 55.

6% net margin versus 2. 6% for Sea Limited — meaning it keeps 55. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NVDA leads at 60. 4% versus 3. 9% for SE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVDA leads at 71. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Joint Stock Company Kaspi. kz (KSPI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 00x versus Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 's 11. 55x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Joint Stock Company Kaspi. kz (KSPI) trades at 0. 0x forward P/E versus 59. 7x for Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. — 59. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SE: 66. 5% to $147. 67.

In this comparison, KSPI (8.

4% yield) pays a dividend. NVDA, AMD, SE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Joint Stock Company Kaspi.

kz (KSPI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 02), 8. 4% yield). Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD) carries a higher beta of 2. 30 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KSPI: +15. 4%, AMD: +110. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (KSPI (Technology) and NVDA (Technology) and AMD (Technology) and SE (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

KSPI pays a dividend while NVDA, AMD, SE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.