Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
KULR vs PGNY vs HIMS vs AEHR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Medical - Equipment & Services
Semiconductors
KULR vs PGNY vs HIMS vs AEHR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Medical - Equipment & Services | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $509M | $1.57B | $6.63B | $2.79B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $17M | $1.29B | $2.35B | $49M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-22M | $68M | $128M | $-11M |
| Gross Margin | 22.1% | 24.1% | 69.7% | 30.2% |
| Operating Margin | -186.9% | 7.5% | 4.6% | -27.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 20.0x | 58.3x | — |
| Total Debt | $2M | $24M | $1.12B | $11M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $30M | $112M | $229M | $25M |
KULR vs PGNY vs HIMS vs AEHR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| KULR Technology Gro… (KULR) | 100 | 36.1 | -63.9% |
| Progyny, Inc. (PGNY) | 100 | 95.0 | -5.0% |
| Hims & Hers Health,… (HIMS) | 100 | 284.6 | +184.6% |
| Aehr Test Systems (AEHR) | 100 | 5892.7 | +5792.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KULR vs PGNY vs HIMS vs AEHR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KULR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
PGNY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.71
- Lower volatility, beta 0.71, Low D/E 4.7%, current ratio 2.73x
- Beta 0.71, current ratio 2.73x
- Better valuation composite
HIMS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 59.0%, EPS growth -3.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 64.5%
- 59.0% revenue growth vs AEHR's -20.2%
- 5.5% margin vs KULR's -133.5%
AEHR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 70.3% 10Y total return vs HIMS's 161.9%
- +9.9% vs KULR's -73.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 59.0% revenue growth vs AEHR's -20.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.5% margin vs KULR's -133.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.71 vs AEHR's 4.77, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +9.9% vs KULR's -73.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.0% ROA vs KULR's -14.3%, ROIC 18.1% vs -86.5% |
KULR vs PGNY vs HIMS vs AEHR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
KULR vs PGNY vs HIMS vs AEHR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PGNY leads in 3 of 6 categories
AEHR leads 1 • KULR leads 0 • HIMS leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PGNY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HIMS is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.3B annually — 140.8x KULR's $17M. HIMS is the more profitable business, keeping 5.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KULR's -133.5%. On growth, KULR holds the edge at +116.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $17M | $1.3B | $2.3B | $49M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$28M | $100M | $164M | -$10M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$22M | $68M | $128M | -$11M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$37M | $181M | $73M | -$14M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +22.1% | +24.1% | +69.7% | +30.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -186.9% | +7.5% | +4.6% | -27.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -133.5% | +5.2% | +5.5% | -22.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.2% | +14.0% | +3.1% | -28.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +116.1% | +1.4% | +28.4% | -26.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -15.5% | +70.6% | -27.3% | -2.2% |
Valuation Metrics
PGNY leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 29.5x trailing earnings, PGNY trades at a 41% valuation discount to HIMS's 50.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PGNY's 16.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HIMS's 42.7x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $509M | $1.6B | $6.6B | $2.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $481M | $1.5B | $7.5B | $2.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -29.07x | 29.48x | 50.32x | -702.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 20.00x | 58.29x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.40x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 16.41x | 42.68x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 47.44x | 1.22x | 2.82x | 47.39x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 8.87x | 3.32x | 12.25x | 21.97x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 8.18x | 89.61x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
PGNY leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HIMS delivers a 23.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $-15 for KULR. KULR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HIMS's 2.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PGNY scores 6/9 vs AEHR's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -15.0% | +13.3% | +23.7% | -8.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -14.3% | +9.0% | +6.0% | -7.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -86.5% | +18.1% | +10.7% | -3.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -49.0% | +17.4% | +10.9% | -3.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.05x | 2.07x | 0.09x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$28M | -$88M | $892M | -$14M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $30M | $112M | $229M | $25M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $24M | $1.1B | $11M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -52.40x | — | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AEHR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AEHR five years ago would be worth $398,515 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,633 for KULR. Over the past 12 months, AEHR leads with a +991.6% total return vs KULR's -73.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AEHR at 50.7% vs KULR's -20.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -14.7% | -25.6% | -23.2% | +311.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -73.1% | -18.2% | -51.0% | +991.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -49.4% | -45.0% | +116.6% | +242.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -83.7% | -62.9% | +137.6% | +3885.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -77.3% | +20.2% | +161.9% | +7029.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -20.3% | -18.1% | +29.4% | +50.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PGNY and AEHR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PGNY is the less volatile stock with a 0.71 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AEHR's 4.77 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AEHR currently trades 89.1% from its 52-week high vs KULR's 19.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.24x | 0.79x | 2.48x | 4.86x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.24 | $28.75 | $70.43 | $102.48 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.94 | $16.10 | $13.74 | $8.06 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +19.2% | +66.6% | +36.4% | +89.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.7 | 57.6 | 54.5 | 67.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 1.5M | 34.9M | 3.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: KULR as "Buy", PGNY as "Buy", HIMS as "Hold", AEHR as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 60.8% upside for PGNY (target: $31) vs -32.1% for AEHR (target: $62).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $30.80 | $26.20 | $62.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 20 | 19 | 3 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +5.2% | +1.4% | +0.0% |
PGNY leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). AEHR leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
KULR vs PGNY vs HIMS vs AEHR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KULR or PGNY or HIMS or AEHR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) is the stronger pick with 59. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 9. 2% for KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR). Progyny, Inc. (PGNY) offers the better valuation at 29. 5x trailing P/E (20. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KULR or PGNY or HIMS or AEHR?
On trailing P/E, Progyny, Inc.
(PGNY) is the cheapest at 29. 5x versus Hims & Hers Health, Inc. at 50. 3x. On forward P/E, Progyny, Inc. is actually cheaper at 20. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KULR or PGNY or HIMS or AEHR?
Over the past 5 years, Aehr Test Systems (AEHR) delivered a total return of +38.
9%, compared to -83. 7% for KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AEHR returned +75. 0% versus KULR's -75. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KULR or PGNY or HIMS or AEHR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Progyny, Inc.
(PGNY) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 79β versus Aehr Test Systems's 4. 86β — meaning AEHR is approximately 519% more volatile than PGNY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 2% for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KULR or PGNY or HIMS or AEHR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) is pulling ahead at 59. 0% versus 9. 2% for KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: KULR Technology Group, Inc. grew EPS 53. 0% year-over-year, compared to -3. 8% for Hims & Hers Health, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HIMS leads at 64. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KULR or PGNY or HIMS or AEHR?
Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 5% net margin versus -163. 2% for KULR Technology Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PGNY leads at 6. 6% versus -141. 9% for KULR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HIMS leads at 59. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KULR or PGNY or HIMS or AEHR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Progyny, Inc.
(PGNY) trades at 20. 0x forward P/E versus 58. 3x for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — 38. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PGNY: 60. 8% to $30. 80.
08Which pays a better dividend — KULR or PGNY or HIMS or AEHR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is KULR or PGNY or HIMS or AEHR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Progyny, Inc.
(PGNY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 79)). KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR) carries a higher beta of 3. 24 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PGNY: +48. 8%, KULR: -75. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KULR and PGNY and HIMS and AEHR?
These companies operate in different sectors (KULR (Technology) and PGNY (Healthcare) and HIMS (Healthcare) and AEHR (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: KULR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PGNY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HIMS is a small-cap high-growth stock; AEHR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.