Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

KULR vs PGNY vs HIMS vs AEHR vs TDOC

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
KULR
KULR Technology Group, Inc.

Hardware, Equipment & Parts

TechnologyAMEX • US
Market Cap$539M
5Y Perf.-63.9%
PGNY
Progyny, Inc.

Medical - Healthcare Information Services

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.94B
5Y Perf.-5.0%
HIMS
Hims & Hers Health, Inc.

Medical - Equipment & Services

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$7.30B
5Y Perf.+184.6%
AEHR
Aehr Test Systems

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.98B
5Y Perf.+5792.7%
TDOC
Teladoc Health, Inc.

Medical - Healthcare Information Services

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.31B
5Y Perf.-95.8%

KULR vs PGNY vs HIMS vs AEHR vs TDOC — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
KULR logoKULR
PGNY logoPGNY
HIMS logoHIMS
AEHR logoAEHR
TDOC logoTDOC
IndustryHardware, Equipment & PartsMedical - Healthcare Information ServicesMedical - Equipment & ServicesSemiconductorsMedical - Healthcare Information Services
Market Cap$539M$1.94B$7.30B$2.98B$1.31B
Revenue (TTM)$17M$1.29B$2.35B$49M$2.51B
Net Income (TTM)$-22M$68M$128M$-11M$-171M
Gross Margin22.1%24.1%69.7%30.2%65.6%
Operating Margin-186.9%7.5%4.6%-27.8%-7.6%
Forward P/E20.0x58.3x
Total Debt$2M$24M$1.12B$11M$1.04B
Cash & Equiv.$30M$112M$229M$25M$781M

KULR vs PGNY vs HIMS vs AEHR vs TDOCLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

KULR
PGNY
HIMS
AEHR
TDOC
StockMay 20May 26Return
KULR Technology Gro… (KULR)10036.1-63.9%
Progyny, Inc. (PGNY)10095.0-5.0%
Hims & Hers Health,… (HIMS)100284.6+184.6%
Aehr Test Systems (AEHR)1005892.7+5792.7%
Teladoc Health, Inc. (TDOC)1004.2-95.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: KULR vs PGNY vs HIMS vs AEHR vs TDOC

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: PGNY leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. Hims & Hers Health, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. AEHR also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
KULR
KULR Technology Group, Inc.
The Technology Pick

KULR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: technology exposure
PGNY
Progyny, Inc.
The Income Pick

PGNY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • beta 0.79
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.79, Low D/E 4.7%, current ratio 2.73x
  • Beta 0.79, current ratio 2.73x
  • Better valuation composite
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
HIMS
Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
The Growth Play

HIMS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 59.0%, EPS growth -3.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 64.5%
  • 59.0% revenue growth vs AEHR's -20.2%
  • 5.5% margin vs KULR's -133.5%
Best for: growth exposure
AEHR
Aehr Test Systems
The Long-Run Compounder

AEHR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.

  • 75.0% 10Y total return vs HIMS's 188.5%
  • +10.5% vs KULR's -73.0%
Best for: long-term compounding
TDOC
Teladoc Health, Inc.
The Healthcare Pick

Among these 5 stocks, TDOC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthHIMS logoHIMS59.0% revenue growth vs AEHR's -20.2%
ValuePGNY logoPGNYBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsHIMS logoHIMS5.5% margin vs KULR's -133.5%
Stability / SafetyPGNY logoPGNYBeta 0.79 vs AEHR's 4.86, lower leverage
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)AEHR logoAEHR+10.5% vs KULR's -73.0%
Efficiency (ROA)PGNY logoPGNY9.0% ROA vs KULR's -14.3%, ROIC 18.1% vs -86.5%

KULR vs PGNY vs HIMS vs AEHR vs TDOC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

KULRKULR Technology Group, Inc.
FY 2022
Product
66.2%$3M
Service
33.8%$1M
PGNYProgyny, Inc.
FY 2025
Fertility benefit services revenue
64.5%$831M
Pharmacy benefit services revenue
35.5%$458M
HIMSHims & Hers Health, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

AEHRAehr Test Systems
FY 2024
Contactors
56.7%$38M
Systems
36.5%$24M
Services
6.8%$4M
TDOCTeladoc Health, Inc.
FY 2025
Other
100.0%$438M

KULR vs PGNY vs HIMS vs AEHR vs TDOC — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLPGNYLAGGINGHIMS

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

PGNY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

TDOC is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.5B annually — 150.8x KULR's $17M. HIMS is the more profitable business, keeping 5.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KULR's -133.5%. On growth, KULR holds the edge at +116.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricKULR logoKULRKULR Technology G…PGNY logoPGNYProgyny, Inc.HIMS logoHIMSHims & Hers Healt…AEHR logoAEHRAehr Test SystemsTDOC logoTDOCTeladoc Health, I…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$17M$1.3B$2.3B$49M$2.5B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$28M$100M$164M-$10M$42M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$22M$68M$128M-$11M-$171M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$37M$181M$73M-$14M$251M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+22.1%+24.1%+69.7%+30.2%+65.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-186.9%+7.5%+4.6%-27.8%-7.6%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-133.5%+5.2%+5.5%-22.7%-6.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-2.2%+14.0%+3.1%-28.1%+10.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+116.1%+1.4%+28.4%-26.5%-2.5%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-15.5%+70.6%-27.3%-2.2%+32.1%
PGNY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

TDOC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 36.5x trailing earnings, PGNY trades at a 34% valuation discount to HIMS's 55.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TDOC's 15.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HIMS's 46.5x.

MetricKULR logoKULRKULR Technology G…PGNY logoPGNYProgyny, Inc.HIMS logoHIMSHims & Hers Healt…AEHR logoAEHRAehr Test SystemsTDOC logoTDOCTeladoc Health, I…
Market CapShares × price$539M$1.9B$7.3B$3.0B$1.3B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$511M$1.9B$8.2B$3.0B$1.6B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-30.78x36.49x55.43x-747.92x-6.36x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.20.00x58.29x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate5.45x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple20.55x46.50x15.65x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue50.22x1.51x3.11x50.49x0.52x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share9.39x4.11x13.50x23.41x0.92x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF10.13x98.70x4.58x
TDOC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

PGNY leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

HIMS delivers a 23.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $-15 for KULR. KULR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HIMS's 2.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PGNY scores 6/9 vs AEHR's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricKULR logoKULRKULR Technology G…PGNY logoPGNYProgyny, Inc.HIMS logoHIMSHims & Hers Healt…AEHR logoAEHRAehr Test SystemsTDOC logoTDOCTeladoc Health, I…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-15.0%+13.3%+23.7%-8.5%-12.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-14.3%+9.0%+6.0%-7.5%-5.9%
ROICReturn on invested capital-86.5%+18.1%+10.7%-3.0%-11.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-49.0%+17.4%+10.9%-3.2%-10.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–956416
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.03x0.05x2.07x0.09x0.75x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$28M-$88M$892M-$14M$259M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$30M$112M$229M$25M$781M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$2M$24M$1.1B$11M$1.0B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-52.40x-8.76x
PGNY leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

AEHR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in AEHR five years ago would be worth $432,134 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $514 for TDOC. Over the past 12 months, AEHR leads with a +1053.4% total return vs KULR's -73.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AEHR at 53.9% vs TDOC's -34.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricKULR logoKULRKULR Technology G…PGNY logoPGNYProgyny, Inc.HIMS logoHIMSHims & Hers Healt…AEHR logoAEHRAehr Test SystemsTDOC logoTDOCTeladoc Health, I…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-9.7%-7.8%-15.4%+338.8%+2.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-73.0%+1.5%-45.0%+1053.4%+2.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-46.4%-31.9%+138.6%+264.7%-72.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-81.9%-53.4%+173.9%+4221.3%-94.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-75.9%+48.8%+188.5%+7496.1%-38.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-18.8%-12.0%+33.6%+53.9%-34.7%
AEHR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — PGNY and AEHR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

PGNY is the less volatile stock with a 0.79 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AEHR's 4.86 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AEHR currently trades 93.6% from its 52-week high vs KULR's 20.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricKULR logoKULRKULR Technology G…PGNY logoPGNYProgyny, Inc.HIMS logoHIMSHims & Hers Healt…AEHR logoAEHRAehr Test SystemsTDOC logoTDOCTeladoc Health, I…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5003.24x0.79x2.48x4.86x1.89x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$14.24$28.75$70.43$103.83$9.77
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.94$16.10$13.74$8.17$4.40
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+20.3%+82.5%+40.1%+93.6%+74.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10056.262.850.261.676.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.2M1.5M34.8M3.0M5.2M
Evenly matched — PGNY and AEHR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: KULR as "Buy", PGNY as "Buy", HIMS as "Hold", AEHR as "Hold", TDOC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 29.8% upside for PGNY (target: $31) vs -36.2% for AEHR (target: $62).

MetricKULR logoKULRKULR Technology G…PGNY logoPGNYProgyny, Inc.HIMS logoHIMSHims & Hers Healt…AEHR logoAEHRAehr Test SystemsTDOC logoTDOCTeladoc Health, I…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyHoldHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$30.80$26.20$62.00$7.58
# AnalystsCovering analysts22019342
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.1%+4.2%+1.2%+0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

PGNY leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TDOC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallProgyny, Inc. (PGNY)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

KULR vs PGNY vs HIMS vs AEHR vs TDOC: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is KULR or PGNY or HIMS or AEHR or TDOC a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.

(HIMS) is the stronger pick with 59. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 5% for Teladoc Health, Inc. (TDOC). Progyny, Inc. (PGNY) offers the better valuation at 36. 5x trailing P/E (20. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — KULR or PGNY or HIMS or AEHR or TDOC?

On trailing P/E, Progyny, Inc.

(PGNY) is the cheapest at 36. 5x versus Hims & Hers Health, Inc. at 55. 4x. On forward P/E, Progyny, Inc. is actually cheaper at 20. 0x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — KULR or PGNY or HIMS or AEHR or TDOC?

Over the past 5 years, Aehr Test Systems (AEHR) delivered a total return of +42.

2%, compared to -94. 9% for Teladoc Health, Inc. (TDOC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AEHR returned +75. 0% versus KULR's -75. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — KULR or PGNY or HIMS or AEHR or TDOC?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Progyny, Inc.

(PGNY) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 79β versus Aehr Test Systems's 4. 86β — meaning AEHR is approximately 519% more volatile than PGNY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 2% for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — KULR or PGNY or HIMS or AEHR or TDOC?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hims & Hers Health, Inc.

(HIMS) is pulling ahead at 59. 0% versus -1. 5% for Teladoc Health, Inc. (TDOC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Teladoc Health, Inc. grew EPS 80. 6% year-over-year, compared to -3. 8% for Hims & Hers Health, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HIMS leads at 64. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — KULR or PGNY or HIMS or AEHR or TDOC?

Hims & Hers Health, Inc.

(HIMS) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 5% net margin versus -163. 2% for KULR Technology Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PGNY leads at 6. 6% versus -141. 9% for KULR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TDOC leads at 69. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is KULR or PGNY or HIMS or AEHR or TDOC more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Progyny, Inc.

(PGNY) trades at 20. 0x forward P/E versus 58. 3x for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — 38. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PGNY: 29. 8% to $30. 80.

08

Which pays a better dividend — KULR or PGNY or HIMS or AEHR or TDOC?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is KULR or PGNY or HIMS or AEHR or TDOC better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Progyny, Inc.

(PGNY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 79)). KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR) carries a higher beta of 3. 24 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PGNY: +48. 8%, KULR: -75. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between KULR and PGNY and HIMS and AEHR and TDOC?

These companies operate in different sectors (KULR (Technology) and PGNY (Healthcare) and HIMS (Healthcare) and AEHR (Technology) and TDOC (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: KULR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PGNY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HIMS is a small-cap high-growth stock; AEHR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TDOC is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

KULR

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 58%
  • Gross Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PGNY

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HIMS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 14%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AEHR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 18%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TDOC

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 39%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform KULR and PGNY and HIMS and AEHR and TDOC on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(KULR: 116.1% · PGNY: 1.4%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.