Auto - Dealerships
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
KXIN vs CANG vs UXIN vs KMX vs AN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Dealerships
Auto - Dealerships
Auto - Dealerships
Auto - Dealerships
KXIN vs CANG vs UXIN vs KMX vs AN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Dealerships | Auto - Dealerships | Auto - Dealerships | Auto - Dealerships | Auto - Dealerships |
| Market Cap | $5M | $223M | $21M | $5.33B | $6.94B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $95K | $3.46B | $2.26B | $27.38B | $27.49B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-66M | $-178M | $-280M | $458M | $679M |
| Gross Margin | -20.4% | 13.6% | 6.5% | 11.0% | 17.7% |
| Operating Margin | -303.1% | 7.3% | -8.4% | 1.7% | 4.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 5.1x | — | 13.8x | 9.6x |
| Total Debt | $1M | $170M | $1.75B | $19.43B | $10.18B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $1.29B | $25M | $247M | $59M |
KXIN vs CANG vs UXIN vs KMX vs AN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kaixin Auto Holdings (KXIN) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Cango Inc. (CANG) | 100 | 19.9 | -80.1% |
| Uxin Limited (UXIN) | 100 | 1.9 | -98.1% |
| CarMax, Inc. (KMX) | 100 | 42.3 | -57.7% |
| AutoNation, Inc. (AN) | 100 | 512.4 | +412.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KXIN vs CANG vs UXIN vs KMX vs AN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KXIN lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
CANG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value is your priority.
- Lower P/E (5.1x vs 9.6x)
UXIN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 45.0%, EPS growth 89.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.8%
- 45.0% revenue growth vs KXIN's -100.0%
Among these 5 stocks, KMX doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
AN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.85
- 319.7% 10Y total return vs KMX's -26.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.85, current ratio 0.84x
- Beta 0.85, current ratio 0.84x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 45.0% revenue growth vs KXIN's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.1x vs 9.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.5% margin vs KXIN's -694.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.85 vs CANG's 2.25 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +15.0% vs KXIN's -99.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.8% ROA vs KXIN's -317.8%, ROIC 8.5% vs -36.0% |
KXIN vs CANG vs UXIN vs KMX vs AN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
KXIN vs CANG vs UXIN vs KMX vs AN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AN leads in 3 of 6 categories
CANG leads 2 • UXIN leads 1 • KXIN leads 0 • KMX leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CANG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AN is the larger business by revenue, generating $27.5B annually — 289401.1x KXIN's $95,000. AN is the more profitable business, keeping 2.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KXIN's -694.9%. On growth, CANG holds the edge at +58.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $95,000 | $3.5B | $2.3B | $27.4B | $27.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$24M | $333M | -$178M | $791M | $1.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$66M | -$178M | -$280M | $458M | $679M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | $0 | $0 | $1.9B | -$104M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -20.4% | +13.6% | +6.5% | +11.0% | +17.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -303.1% | +7.3% | -8.4% | +1.7% | +4.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -694.9% | -5.2% | -12.4% | +1.7% | +2.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -32.4% | -154.0% | -13.3% | +7.1% | -0.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +58.3% | +64.1% | -13.4% | -2.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +88.7% | +3.6% | +94.9% | -46.9% | +33.0% |
Valuation Metrics
UXIN leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.1x trailing earnings, CANG trades at a 57% valuation discount to AN's 11.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CANG's 2.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KMX's 22.3x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5M | $223M | $21M | $5.3B | $6.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3M | $59M | $274M | $24.5B | $17.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.09x | 5.07x | -0.54x | 11.60x | 11.87x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 13.83x | 9.56x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 0.37x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 2.17x | — | 22.26x | 10.76x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 1.89x | 0.07x | 0.19x | 0.25x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.29x | 0.37x | — | 0.93x | 3.29x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 34.05x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
AN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AN delivers a 28.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $28 in annual profit, vs $-6 for KXIN. CANG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AN's 4.35x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KMX scores 8/9 vs KXIN's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -5.9% | -4.1% | — | +7.5% | +28.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.2% | -2.3% | -14.2% | +1.8% | +4.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -36.0% | +4.6% | -11.2% | +2.4% | +8.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -44.5% | +4.5% | -19.4% | +3.1% | +17.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.08x | 0.04x | — | 3.11x | 4.35x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1M | -$1.1B | $1.7B | $19.2B | $10.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $1.3B | $25M | $247M | $59M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $170M | $1.7B | $19.4B | $10.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -88.45x | -1.87x | -1.99x | 3.08x | 4.53x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AN five years ago would be worth $19,380 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for KXIN. Over the past 12 months, AN leads with a +15.0% total return vs KXIN's -99.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AN at 14.9% vs KXIN's -96.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -95.3% | -66.0% | -20.7% | -5.2% | -2.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -99.0% | -76.4% | -44.7% | -43.8% | +15.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -13.7% | -74.1% | -47.2% | +51.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -20.6% | -98.9% | -73.0% | +93.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -45.7% | -99.7% | -26.4% | +319.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -96.8% | -4.8% | -36.3% | -19.2% | +14.9% |
Risk & Volatility
AN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AN is the less volatile stock with a 0.85 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CANG's 2.25 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AN currently trades 88.4% from its 52-week high vs KXIN's 0.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.11x | 2.25x | 1.19x | 1.32x | 0.85x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $832.50 | $2.88 | $5.36 | $71.99 | $228.92 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.10 | $0.33 | $2.45 | $30.26 | $173.26 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.5% | +16.6% | +53.5% | +51.7% | +88.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 31.2 | 47.2 | 54.9 | 36.5 | 51.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 22K | 1.3M | 158K | 3.2M | 412K |
Analyst Outlook
CANG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CANG as "Buy", UXIN as "Hold", KMX as "Hold", AN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 526.7% upside for CANG (target: $3) vs 1.4% for KMX (target: $38).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $3.00 | $4.50 | $37.78 | $248.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 2 | 3 | 35 | 34 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 5 | — | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +6.0% | 0.0% | +8.0% | +11.4% |
AN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). CANG leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook).
KXIN vs CANG vs UXIN vs KMX vs AN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KXIN or CANG or UXIN or KMX or AN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Uxin Limited (UXIN) is the stronger pick with 45.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Kaixin Auto Holdings (KXIN). Cango Inc. (CANG) offers the better valuation at 5. 1x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cango Inc. (CANG) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KXIN or CANG or UXIN or KMX or AN?
On trailing P/E, Cango Inc.
(CANG) is the cheapest at 5. 1x versus AutoNation, Inc. at 11. 9x. On forward P/E, AutoNation, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KXIN or CANG or UXIN or KMX or AN?
Over the past 5 years, AutoNation, Inc.
(AN) delivered a total return of +93. 8%, compared to -100. 0% for Kaixin Auto Holdings (KXIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AN returned +319. 7% versus KXIN's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KXIN or CANG or UXIN or KMX or AN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AutoNation, Inc.
(AN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 85β versus Cango Inc. 's 2. 25β — meaning CANG is approximately 165% more volatile than AN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cango Inc. (CANG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 4% for AutoNation, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KXIN or CANG or UXIN or KMX or AN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Uxin Limited (UXIN) is pulling ahead at 45.
0% versus -100. 0% for Kaixin Auto Holdings (KXIN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cango Inc. grew EPS 960. 0% year-over-year, compared to 0. 7% for AutoNation, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, UXIN leads at 6. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KXIN or CANG or UXIN or KMX or AN?
Cango Inc.
(CANG) is the more profitable company, earning 37. 3% net margin versus -694. 9% for Kaixin Auto Holdings — meaning it keeps 37. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CANG leads at 22. 2% versus -303. 1% for KXIN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CANG leads at 55. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KXIN or CANG or UXIN or KMX or AN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, AutoNation, Inc.
(AN) trades at 9. 6x forward P/E versus 13. 8x for CarMax, Inc. — 4. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CANG: 526. 7% to $3. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — KXIN or CANG or UXIN or KMX or AN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is KXIN or CANG or UXIN or KMX or AN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, AutoNation, Inc.
(AN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 85), +319. 7% 10Y return). Kaixin Auto Holdings (KXIN) carries a higher beta of 2. 11 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AN: +319. 7%, KXIN: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KXIN and CANG and UXIN and KMX and AN?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: KXIN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CANG is a small-cap deep-value stock; UXIN is a small-cap high-growth stock; KMX is a small-cap deep-value stock; AN is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.