Semiconductors
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
LAES vs QLYS vs TENB vs XTLB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Infrastructure
Biotechnology
LAES vs QLYS vs TENB vs XTLB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Semiconductors | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $108M | $3.34B | $2.47B | $294K |
| Revenue (TTM) | $35M | $685M | $1.02B | $451K |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-50M | $201M | $-12M | $-1M |
| Gross Margin | 37.3% | 83.1% | 78.2% | 26.4% |
| Operating Margin | -136.9% | 33.7% | 2.9% | -481.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 12.9x | 11.1x | — |
| Total Debt | $9M | $97M | $466M | $138K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $85M | $250M | $188M | $371K |
LAES vs QLYS vs TENB vs XTLB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SEALSQ Corp (LAES) | 100 | 25.4 | -74.6% |
| Qualys, Inc. (QLYS) | 100 | 75.2 | -24.8% |
| Tenable Holdings, I… (TENB) | 100 | 52.5 | -47.5% |
| XTL Biopharmaceutic… (XTLB) | 100 | 54.3 | -45.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LAES vs QLYS vs TENB vs XTLB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LAES is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +30.3% vs XTLB's -50.9%
QLYS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 0.53
- 267.2% 10Y total return vs TENB's -28.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.53, Low D/E 17.3%, current ratio 1.41x
- Beta 0.53, current ratio 1.41x
TENB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 11.0%, EPS growth 3.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.5%
- 11.0% revenue growth vs XTLB's -173.2%
- Better valuation composite
XTLB lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.0% revenue growth vs XTLB's -173.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 29.4% margin vs XTLB's -227.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.53 vs LAES's 3.10 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +30.3% vs XTLB's -50.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.1% ROA vs LAES's -35.2%, ROIC 47.5% vs -165.0% |
LAES vs QLYS vs TENB vs XTLB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
LAES vs QLYS vs TENB vs XTLB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
QLYS leads in 4 of 6 categories
TENB leads 1 • LAES leads 0 • XTLB leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
QLYS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TENB is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.0B annually — 2266.8x XTLB's $451,000. QLYS is the more profitable business, keeping 29.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to XTLB's -2.3%. On growth, QLYS holds the edge at +9.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $35M | $685M | $1.0B | $451,000 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$47M | $241M | $72M | -$1M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$50M | $201M | -$12M | -$1M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$31M | $290M | $263M | $0 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +37.3% | +83.1% | +78.2% | +26.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -136.9% | +33.7% | +2.9% | -4.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -141.3% | +29.4% | -1.2% | -2.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -88.9% | +42.4% | +25.7% | -3.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.1% | +9.8% | +9.6% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +75.0% | +10.1% | +106.3% | +20.0% |
Valuation Metrics
TENB leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, QLYS's 13.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TENB's 63.6x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $108M | $3.3B | $2.5B | $293,767 |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $32M | $3.2B | $2.7B | $60,767 |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -4.49x | 17.45x | -71.80x | -0.28x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 12.87x | 11.06x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.90x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 13.49x | 63.60x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 9.79x | 5.00x | 2.47x | 0.65x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.38x | 6.17x | 7.93x | 0.05x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 10.98x | 9.69x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
QLYS leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
QLYS delivers a 37.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $37 in annual profit, vs $-42 for LAES. XTLB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TENB's 1.43x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), QLYS scores 6/9 vs XTLB's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -42.3% | +37.2% | -3.7% | -25.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -35.2% | +19.1% | -0.7% | -17.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -165.0% | +47.5% | +0.2% | -54.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -34.0% | +37.8% | +0.1% | -50.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.11x | 0.17x | 1.43x | 0.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$76M | -$153M | $278M | -$233,000 |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $85M | $250M | $188M | $371,000 |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $9M | $97M | $466M | $138,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -13.04x | — | 1.02x | -13.31x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
QLYS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in QLYS five years ago would be worth $9,694 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,963 for XTLB. Over the past 12 months, LAES leads with a +30.3% total return vs XTLB's -50.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors QLYS at -6.3% vs LAES's -34.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -28.1% | -27.5% | -5.2% | +11.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +30.3% | -25.6% | -31.2% | -50.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -71.9% | -17.7% | -41.1% | -45.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -71.9% | -3.1% | -41.9% | -80.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -71.9% | +267.2% | -28.8% | -87.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -34.5% | -6.3% | -16.2% | -18.4% |
Risk & Volatility
QLYS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
QLYS is the less volatile stock with a 0.53 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LAES's 3.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. QLYS currently trades 61.1% from its 52-week high vs XTLB's 26.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.10x | 0.53x | 1.12x | 1.71x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.71 | $155.47 | $35.69 | $10.28 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.99 | $74.51 | $15.73 | $1.05 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +35.0% | +61.1% | +60.4% | +26.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.0 | 54.2 | 60.1 | 57.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 10.4M | 773K | 3.0M | 2.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LAES as "Buy", QLYS as "Hold", TENB as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 145.9% upside for LAES (target: $8) vs 29.7% for TENB (target: $28).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $7.50 | $134.30 | $27.94 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 48 | 28 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +5.5% | +10.0% | 0.0% |
QLYS leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TENB leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
LAES vs QLYS vs TENB vs XTLB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LAES or QLYS or TENB or XTLB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Tenable Holdings, Inc.
(TENB) is the stronger pick with 11. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -63. 5% for SEALSQ Corp (LAES). Qualys, Inc. (QLYS) offers the better valuation at 17. 5x trailing P/E (12. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate SEALSQ Corp (LAES) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LAES or QLYS or TENB or XTLB?
On forward P/E, Tenable Holdings, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 11. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LAES or QLYS or TENB or XTLB?
Over the past 5 years, Qualys, Inc.
(QLYS) delivered a total return of -3. 1%, compared to -80. 4% for XTL Biopharmaceuticals Ltd. (XTLB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: QLYS returned +267. 2% versus XTLB's -87. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LAES or QLYS or TENB or XTLB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Qualys, Inc.
(QLYS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 53β versus SEALSQ Corp's 3. 10β — meaning LAES is approximately 484% more volatile than QLYS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, XTL Biopharmaceuticals Ltd. (XTLB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 143% for Tenable Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LAES or QLYS or TENB or XTLB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Tenable Holdings, Inc.
(TENB) is pulling ahead at 11. 0% versus -63. 5% for SEALSQ Corp (LAES). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Qualys, Inc. grew EPS 17. 0% year-over-year, compared to -223. 8% for SEALSQ Corp. Over a 3-year CAGR, TENB leads at 13. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LAES or QLYS or TENB or XTLB?
Qualys, Inc.
(QLYS) is the more profitable company, earning 29. 6% net margin versus -227. 7% for XTL Biopharmaceuticals Ltd. — meaning it keeps 29. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: QLYS leads at 33. 2% versus -481. 6% for XTLB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — QLYS leads at 82. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LAES or QLYS or TENB or XTLB more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Tenable Holdings, Inc.
(TENB) trades at 11. 1x forward P/E versus 12. 9x for Qualys, Inc. — 1. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LAES: 145. 9% to $7. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — LAES or QLYS or TENB or XTLB?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is LAES or QLYS or TENB or XTLB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Qualys, Inc.
(QLYS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 53), +267. 2% 10Y return). SEALSQ Corp (LAES) carries a higher beta of 3. 10 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (QLYS: +267. 2%, LAES: -71. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LAES and QLYS and TENB and XTLB?
These companies operate in different sectors (LAES (Technology) and QLYS (Technology) and TENB (Technology) and XTLB (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: LAES is a small-cap quality compounder stock; QLYS is a small-cap deep-value stock; TENB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; XTLB is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.