Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

LBRT vs PUMP vs ACDC vs RES

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
LBRT
Liberty Energy Inc.

Oil & Gas Equipment & Services

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$5.26B
5Y Perf.+99.6%
PUMP
ProPetro Holding Corp.

Oil & Gas Equipment & Services

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.93B
5Y Perf.+20.8%
ACDC
ProFrac Holding Corp.

Oil & Gas Equipment & Services

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.29B
5Y Perf.-60.9%
RES
RPC, Inc.

Oil & Gas Equipment & Services

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.64B
5Y Perf.-21.2%

LBRT vs PUMP vs ACDC vs RES — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
LBRT logoLBRT
PUMP logoPUMP
ACDC logoACDC
RES logoRES
IndustryOil & Gas Equipment & ServicesOil & Gas Equipment & ServicesOil & Gas Equipment & ServicesOil & Gas Equipment & Services
Market Cap$5.26B$1.93B$1.29B$1.64B
Revenue (TTM)$4.05B$1.18B$1.94B$1.63B
Net Income (TTM)$150M$-12M$-367M$32M
Gross Margin10.7%8.3%3.7%14.3%
Operating Margin1.5%-1.1%-8.5%3.5%
Forward P/E3568.1x2021.8x35.7x
Total Debt$873M$249M$1.14B$95M
Cash & Equiv.$28M$91M$23M$210M

LBRT vs PUMP vs ACDC vs RESLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

LBRT
PUMP
ACDC
RES
StockMay 22May 26Return
Liberty Energy Inc. (LBRT)100199.6+99.6%
ProPetro Holding Co… (PUMP)100120.8+20.8%
ProFrac Holding Cor… (ACDC)10039.1-60.9%
RPC, Inc. (RES)10078.8-21.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: LBRT vs PUMP vs ACDC vs RES

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: LBRT and RES are tied at the top with 3 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. RPC, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. PUMP also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
LBRT
Liberty Energy Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

LBRT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.

  • 98.8% 10Y total return vs PUMP's 8.8%
  • 3.7% margin vs ACDC's -18.9%
  • 1.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs RES's 2.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
  • 4.0% ROA vs ACDC's -13.1%, ROIC 2.3% vs -4.6%
Best for: long-term compounding
PUMP
ProPetro Holding Corp.
The Momentum Pick

PUMP is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +199.8% vs ACDC's +56.4%
Best for: momentum
ACDC
ProFrac Holding Corp.
The Secondary Option

ACDC lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: energy exposure
RES
RPC, Inc.
The Income Pick

RES is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.54, yield 2.2%
  • Rev growth 15.0%, EPS growth -65.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 0.5%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.54, Low D/E 8.7%, current ratio 3.24x
  • Beta 0.54, yield 2.2%, current ratio 3.24x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthRES logoRES15.0% revenue growth vs PUMP's -12.1%
ValueRES logoRESBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsLBRT logoLBRT3.7% margin vs ACDC's -18.9%
Stability / SafetyRES logoRESBeta 0.54 vs LBRT's 1.31, lower leverage
DividendsLBRT logoLBRT1.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs RES's 2.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)PUMP logoPUMP+199.8% vs ACDC's +56.4%
Efficiency (ROA)LBRT logoLBRT4.0% ROA vs ACDC's -13.1%, ROIC 2.3% vs -4.6%

LBRT vs PUMP vs ACDC vs RES — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

LBRTLiberty Energy Inc.
FY 2025
Service, Other
100.0%$600,000
PUMPProPetro Holding Corp.
FY 2025
Power Generation
100.0%$2M
ACDCProFrac Holding Corp.
FY 2025
Service
87.2%$1.7B
Product
12.8%$249M
RESRPC, Inc.
FY 2025
Technical Services
94.4%$1.5B
Support Services
5.6%$91M

LBRT vs PUMP vs ACDC vs RES — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLRESLAGGINGACDC

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

RES leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

LBRT is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.0B annually — 3.4x PUMP's $1.2B. LBRT is the more profitable business, keeping 3.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ACDC's -18.9%. On growth, RES holds the edge at +27.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricLBRT logoLBRTLiberty Energy In…PUMP logoPUMPProPetro Holding …ACDC logoACDCProFrac Holding C…RES logoRESRPC, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$4.0B$1.2B$1.9B$1.6B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$549M$154M$251M$218M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$150M-$12M-$367M$32M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$193M-$11M$20M$53M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+10.7%+8.3%+3.7%+14.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+1.5%-1.1%-8.5%+3.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+3.7%-1.1%-18.9%+2.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-4.8%-0.9%+1.0%+3.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+4.5%-24.7%-4.0%+27.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+16.7%-134.2%-33.3%-124.9%
RES leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — ACDC and RES each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 36.5x trailing earnings, LBRT trades at a 98% valuation discount to PUMP's 2021.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, RES's 7.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PUMP's 10.8x.

MetricLBRT logoLBRTLiberty Energy In…PUMP logoPUMPProPetro Holding …ACDC logoACDCProFrac Holding C…RES logoRESRPC, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$5.3B$1.9B$1.3B$1.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$6.1B$2.1B$2.4B$1.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS36.48x2021.79x-3.10x49.20x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.3568.13x35.74x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple10.50x10.81x8.54x6.97x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.31x1.52x0.66x1.01x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.59x2.00x1.30x1.47x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF373.05x45.52x65.81x30.91x
Evenly matched — ACDC and RES each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

RES leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

LBRT delivers a 7.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-38 for ACDC. RES carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ACDC's 1.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PUMP scores 5/9 vs ACDC's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricLBRT logoLBRTLiberty Energy In…PUMP logoPUMPProPetro Holding …ACDC logoACDCProFrac Holding C…RES logoRESRPC, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+7.4%-1.4%-38.2%+2.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+4.0%-1.0%-13.1%+2.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital+2.3%+1.4%-4.6%+4.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+3.0%+1.8%-6.2%+4.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–94534
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.42x0.30x1.30x0.09x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$846M$158M$1.1B-$115M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$28M$91M$23M$210M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$873M$249M$1.1B$95M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense5.24x-0.86x-1.22x10.86x
RES leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

LBRT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in LBRT five years ago would be worth $25,534 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,937 for ACDC. Over the past 12 months, PUMP leads with a +199.8% total return vs ACDC's +56.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LBRT at 39.7% vs ACDC's -11.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricLBRT logoLBRTLiberty Energy In…PUMP logoPUMPProPetro Holding …ACDC logoACDCProFrac Holding C…RES logoRESRPC, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+72.5%+60.6%+76.5%+34.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+193.5%+199.8%+56.4%+58.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+172.7%+136.1%-30.1%+13.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+155.3%+50.8%-60.6%+43.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+98.8%+8.8%-60.6%-35.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+39.7%+33.2%-11.3%+4.2%
LBRT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — LBRT and RES each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

RES is the less volatile stock with a 0.54 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LBRT's 1.31 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LBRT currently trades 94.3% from its 52-week high vs ACDC's 66.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricLBRT logoLBRTLiberty Energy In…PUMP logoPUMPProPetro Holding …ACDC logoACDCProFrac Holding C…RES logoRESRPC, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.31x1.12x0.83x0.54x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$34.41$18.50$10.70$8.16
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$9.90$4.51$3.08$4.18
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+94.3%+85.2%+66.6%+90.4%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10066.459.363.860.7
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded4.2M3.5M1.5M2.3M
Evenly matched — LBRT and RES each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — LBRT and RES each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: LBRT as "Buy", PUMP as "Buy", ACDC as "Hold", RES as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 4.7% upside for LBRT (target: $34) vs -18.7% for RES (target: $6). For income investors, RES offers the higher dividend yield at 2.17% vs LBRT's 1.01%.

MetricLBRT logoLBRTLiberty Energy In…PUMP logoPUMPProPetro Holding …ACDC logoACDCProFrac Holding C…RES logoRESRPC, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$34.00$14.75$6.00$6.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts1930636
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.0%+2.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises40
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.33$0.16
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.5%0.0%0.0%+0.2%
Evenly matched — LBRT and RES each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

RES leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). LBRT leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.

Best OverallRPC, Inc. (RES)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

LBRT vs PUMP vs ACDC vs RES: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is LBRT or PUMP or ACDC or RES a better buy right now?

For growth investors, RPC, Inc.

(RES) is the stronger pick with 15. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -12. 1% for ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP). Liberty Energy Inc. (LBRT) offers the better valuation at 36. 5x trailing P/E (3568. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Liberty Energy Inc. (LBRT) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — LBRT or PUMP or ACDC or RES?

On trailing P/E, Liberty Energy Inc.

(LBRT) is the cheapest at 36. 5x versus ProPetro Holding Corp. at 2021. 8x. On forward P/E, RPC, Inc. is actually cheaper at 35. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — LBRT or PUMP or ACDC or RES?

Over the past 5 years, Liberty Energy Inc.

(LBRT) delivered a total return of +155. 3%, compared to -60. 6% for ProFrac Holding Corp. (ACDC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LBRT returned +98. 8% versus ACDC's -60. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — LBRT or PUMP or ACDC or RES?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), RPC, Inc.

(RES) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 54β versus Liberty Energy Inc. 's 1. 31β — meaning LBRT is approximately 142% more volatile than RES relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, RPC, Inc. (RES) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 130% for ProFrac Holding Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — LBRT or PUMP or ACDC or RES?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), RPC, Inc.

(RES) is pulling ahead at 15. 0% versus -12. 1% for ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ProPetro Holding Corp. grew EPS 100. 6% year-over-year, compared to -66. 7% for ProFrac Holding Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RES leads at 0. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — LBRT or PUMP or ACDC or RES?

Liberty Energy Inc.

(LBRT) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 7% net margin versus -19. 0% for ProFrac Holding Corp. — meaning it keeps 3. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RES leads at 3. 5% versus -6. 9% for ACDC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RES leads at 14. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is LBRT or PUMP or ACDC or RES more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, RPC, Inc.

(RES) trades at 35. 7x forward P/E versus 3568. 1x for Liberty Energy Inc. — 3532. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LBRT: 4. 7% to $34. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — LBRT or PUMP or ACDC or RES?

In this comparison, RES (2.

2% yield), LBRT (1. 0% yield) pay a dividend. PUMP, ACDC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is LBRT or PUMP or ACDC or RES better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, RPC, Inc.

(RES) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 54), 2. 2% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (RES: -35. 7%, PUMP: +8. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between LBRT and PUMP and ACDC and RES?

Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

LBRT, RES pay a dividend while PUMP, ACDC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

LBRT

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PUMP

Quality Business

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ACDC

Quality Business

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RES

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 13%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.8%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform LBRT and PUMP and ACDC and RES on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(LBRT: 4.5% · PUMP: -24.7%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(LBRT: 36.5x · PUMP: 2021.8x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.